MovieChat Forums > F Is for Family (2015) Discussion > Unpleasant. Is this what the creators w...

Unpleasant. Is this what the creators were going for?


Derivative. Ugly. Vulgar. Cliched. Who has other words to describe "F is for Family?"

What a loathsome show.

For every animal bought, a shelter animal dies.

reply

It's an awesome show.

reply

I liked it. If "That '70s Show" and "Married with Children" had a love child that Mike Judge animated(and was shown on a premium channel where it could be as vulgar as it wanted to be), this is basically what you'd get. Actually, compared to Burr's normal stand-up, I found it quite toned down aside from the language.

Ohhhhh no! There goes Tokyo! Go, go Godzilla!

reply

You actually perfectly point out why this show doesn't work - it REMINDS you of better shows, that did similar things better. I WOULD rather watch 'That '70s Show', 'Married With Children' or Mike Judge's best work. Heck, even the best episodes of King of the Hill are more pleasant to watch than this.

Why is it that when a show swims in vulgarity and low-brow cesspool of stupidity and filth, people are so quick to raise to defend it, but then they never have actual arguments, so they have to insult the poster, who did nothing more than give fair criticism towards a below-mediocre cartoon that mimics other shows so much that you wish you were watching those other shows instead..?

Let's just start being honest with things and call things what they are. So far, this show has not impressed me, and it has made me want to watch so many other shows instead. Heck, even the UK 'The Office' is more entertaining and interesting than this one. At least they tried doing something new back in the day..

reply

Good show... mr pickle is good as well

reply