I wonder exactly what type of twisted psychological hunger a person would apparently need to repeatedly keep feeding by posting this same exact question periodically again and again?
No man lies so boldly as the man who is indignant.
It is skipped completely. Can't show Nat Turner for a cowardly murderer after all.
shareBut owning slaves is heroic, right? And no blacks were ever lynched or murdered by whites, right? Go burn a cross. You will feel better.
sharebaddogbites
Wow thanks for your comment as the other posted sounds pretty darn silly. SMH
Guess he /she forgot about the whites back then who were cowardly murderers.
Baddpgsbites - You forgot mention the cowards who killed Emmitt Till. A child at 10 years old who was burned to death by two little d!ck cowards because he winked at a white woman.
Fck Life
yeah I guess like it shows the whites who were cowardly murderers, right?
you might feel better after a nap. BYE!
Yes they showed the hanging of black children.
shareThis film with its agenda wouldn't dare show the slaughter of white children. It is fact that goes against the political spin.
shareDo you mean the kind of political spin that has consistently demanded that portraying anything close to realistic cinematic imagery of whites endlessly, psychologically and physically, torturing and killing "N----rs" and "Injuns" was to be virtually excluded from all movies for more than 100 years. And with it, the immense sociopathy inherent in realistically portraying any such truthful imagery was instead to be replaced with scenes that completely turned the immeasurable immorality of such seemingly endless and racially violent things into heartwarming displays of heroism and noble sacrifice. With the stars of THOUSANDS of such incredibly dishonest movies exalted to the status of national icons (in films like: Gone With the Wind, Song Of The South, The Birth Of A Nation, Lincoln, Amistad, Glory, and almost all other Westerns and Slavery movies ever, etc.). That political spin?
No man lies so boldly as the man who is indignant.
Do you mean the kind of political spin that has consistently demanded that portraying anything close to realistic cinematic imagery of whites endlessly, psychologically and physically, torturing and killing "N----rs" and "Injuns" was to be virtually excluded from all movies for more than 100 years. And with it, the immense sociopathy inherent in realistically portraying any such truthful imagery was instead to be replaced with scenes that completely turned the immeasurable immorality of such seemingly endless and racially violent things into heartwarming displays of heroism and noble sacrifice. With the stars of THOUSANDS of such incredibly dishonest movies exalted to the status of national icons (in films like: Gone With the Wind, Song Of The South, The Birth Of A Nation, Lincoln, Amistad, Glory, and almost all other Westerns and Slavery movies ever, etc.). That political spin?
if I was in Nates shoes, I wouldn't be suprised if I found myself considering killing those little runts who lived off the false incarceration and torture of my fellows for 400 years.
You'd want to kill Hitler and his mazis right?