I don't agree. You have to remember that Utrecht, along with most young warriors in those days, was barely out of his teens. By the end of the book A Pale Horsemen, Utrecht was 20 with a 16-year old wife. At that age their minds have still not matured and they act on their emotions and testosterone rather than thinking things through, which was partly whey they were so quick to go to war and kill each other. He had known nothing but war and killing, and the glory of being a warrior was his life's ambition. The anarchy of the times did not help. Think of living in a country with no effective law and order being run by biker gangs and various teen gangs who rob and kill at will, sometimes for no other reason than that they can, and if they see something they want, they take it. If anything Alexander Dreyton is a little old for the part right now, but as the character ages 5 years with each book, he will grow into it. I think his acting is quite subtle, when he saw Iseult for the first time he stopped in his tracks and his eyes widened slightly. No words were needed to express what he was thinking. As the story progresses, Utrecht will become a brutal killer with little conscience as that is what he knows. A bigger problem for me was casting actors who did not resemble the description in the books, and most baffling was changing Svein of the White Horse into two characters, Svein and Skorca when there was no apparent reason to do so.
reply
share