I feel like they had some "cover" provided by the presence of cameraman and some kind of crew presence, so that people didn't think it was "real" or an actual political event, which shielded the film from prosecution for violating actual anti-Nazi laws.
A good chunk of the road trip simply had "Hitler" looking like Hitler, but without any uniform. This may also have helped diffuse reaction.
We also don't see the many bad reactions they got that ran counter to the intended narrative of the film. I'm sure there's hours of footage of people booing this guy or threatening him with violence, or the police stepping in and asking questions and trying to shut that moment's filming down.
We also don't see the "setup" scenes before the scenes shown in the movie. Maybe the actor playing Hitler cracks jokes and makes fun of "being Hitler" before shifting character for the footage they actually wanted.
I really liked this film, especially the first 2/3s or so, but it's also a great example of how manipulative filmmaking can be, especially when its trying to appear "spontaneous" and "real" when it's not.
reply
share