MovieChat Forums > Avengers: Endgame (2019) Discussion > Iron Man figuring out time travel so cas...

Iron Man figuring out time travel so casually


Honestly, it's just embarrassingly lazy script-writing. 8.4 out of 10 my ass.

reply

Except Iron Man didn't really figure out Time Travel. The Quantum Tunnel is what facilitated time travel. Tony had to figure out how to navigate through time travel so that the team exited and entered appropriately.

Bruce accomplished the same thing he just hadn't figured out to move through time rather than have time move through the individual.

Seriously though the MCU is full of faux technology like the Bifrost, Pym particles, Uru metal, Vibranium, sling rings and suddenly Time Travel being conveniently solved is lazy writing?
That is hilarious!!!

reply

Ah yes, because Vibranium and Uru metal exists in this universe we must accept any plot device no matter how lazy and convenient. Stop acting obtuse.

reply

i agree. it's like they were tired and justgave up. to get it over with

reply

Meh. He did fall on his ass in shock. And it was pre-ordained by Dr. Strange.

reply

LOL:

You're talking about the de facto smartest guy on the planet, in the MCU. A guy who made a suit of ARMOR in a Cave, with the most rudimentary of tools/materials.

It's always hilarious when people point out the parts that tweak them. It invariably shows where their particular thought process stops, or gets fuzzy.

Also hilarious when that incredibly tired "lazy" term gets thrown around. "Lazy?" You have not the slightest idea how many man-hours by how many teams of writers were involved in these stories. But for heaven's sake, Don't let that stop you from being triggered by a plot point you disagree with, or don't understand.

reply

I LIKE THIS^🙂

reply

A guy who made a suit of ARMOR in a Cave


Ah yes, because making a suit of armor is the equivalent of nonchalantly figuring out time travel because the plot conveniently calls for it. Jackass.

You have not the slightest idea how many man-hours by how many teams of writers were involved in these stories.


I don't care if they brought Stan lee back from the dead, a lazy plot device is a lazy plot device. The number of writers doesn't change the fact that they settled on the laziest solution possible - let's just turn back time and undo everything.

Don't let that stop you from being triggered by a plot point you disagree with, or don't understand.


LOL oh you're hilarious buddy. This is lowest common denominator film-making, there's nothing to understand. It's made for dim-witted fucktards who clap like seals no matter how lazy the writing.

reply

There are a lot of ways to say this, but the simplest is: You're a special kind of stupid, huh?
1) If you don't get that him making that first Iron Man armor was an illustration of someone smart enough to figure out what he needed to in Endgame, then there's no help for you. Sorry.
2) It's not lazy. "Lazy" is what dimwits use, when they're too stupid to understand narrative choices they don't agree with. Sorry.
3) You can continue to tilt back your head and bray stupidities, or you can just accept that the things you don't like are your own problem. Has nothing to do with some abstract concept of absolute quality, or interest, or engagement. I know these concepts are too subtle for you, so: Sorry.

Good luck in life. You're gonna need it.

reply

Shit for brains is back for more.

1) If you don't get that him making that first Iron Man armor was an illustration of someone smart enough to figure out what he needed to in Endgame, then there's no help for you. Sorry.


Building a mechanized suit of armor and figuring out time travel are not comparable, they're not even in the same ballpark. He's a defense contractor, the ability to build weapons and armor is the basis of his character. Time travel is literally another dimension. Next argument douchenozzle.

2) 2) It's not lazy. "Lazy" is what dimwits use, when they're too stupid to understand narrative choices they don't agree with.


Again, stop pretending like there's anything remotely intelligent about the Endgame plot, it's embarrassing. It's literally made to appeal to kids and man-childs like yourself, there's absolutely nothing in this movie with any depth or complexity. Stop embarrassing yourself.

3) You can continue to tilt back your head and bray stupidities, or you can just accept that the things you don't like are your own problem. Has nothing to do with some abstract concept of absolute quality, or interest, or engagement.


You were probably smelling your own farts and wearing your Avengers pjs when you wrote this drivel. You're not intelligent buddy, and neither is this movie. Now go play with your action figures.

reply

"Building a mechanized suit of armor and figuring out time travel are not comparable, they're not even in the same ballpark. He's a defense contractor, the ability to build weapons and armor is the basis of his character. Time travel is literally another dimension. Next argument douchenozzle."

No one said they were comparable. The word you're unfamiliar with is "analogous." Unsurprisingly, you're unable to grasp this fairly simple concept, so: just give up. We get it, you're challenged.

"Derp derp derp 'there's absolutely nothing in this movie with any depth or complexity' Derpy derp"

Again, your inability to grasp subtleties is noted. Move on; you're boring us.

reply

No one said they were comparable. The word you're unfamiliar with is "analogous."


You need to look up the definition of "analogous" because you clearly don't know what it means. You're a classic example of someone who thinks they're intelligent when they're demonstrably a halfwit.

Again, your inability to grasp subtleties is noted.


LOL subtlety. In an Avengers movie. You're on the wrong board pal, this isn't The Godfather. Avengers is designed to appeal to the lowest common denominator i.e. dullards like yourself.

Move on; you're boring us.


The lack of self awareness is astounding.

reply

Ah yes, because making a suit of armor is the equivalent of nonchalantly figuring out time travel because the plot conveniently calls for it. Jackass.

As previously mentioned.... HE DIDN'T FIGURE OUT TIME TRAVEL, HE FIGURED OUT HOW TO NAVIGATE IT!

reply

So he figured out...time navigation? Same thing.

reply

You're talking about the de facto smartest guy on the planet, in the MCU. A guy who made a suit of ARMOR in a Cave, with the most rudimentary of tools/materials.
The making of the armor was not the technological genius level achievement of Tony Stark driven through desperation, "Necessity being the mother of invention."

What separated Tony from all of the other scientists at Stark Industries was something he created and retrofitted to power his initial Iron Man armor. Tony created the miniaturized Arc Fusion Reactor. The head scientist explains to Stane that the technology required to power the suit didn't exist. Here is the infamous scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_HCUgtJGoI

The Arc Reactor built with scraps is a demonstration of pure genius and ingenuity. The ARMOR wasn't a testament to his genius but defensive practicality.

Last point. It wasn't Stark that figured out paradoxical temporal navigation using Quantum Tunneling it was his AI computer Friday. Time navigation was going to happen either by Hank Pym or any other MCU level genius. By the Hoary Hosts of Hoggoth Dr. Strange probably had 10 different ways of time travel available to him besides the Time Stone.

reply

"The making of the armor was not the technological genius level achievement of Tony Stark driven through desperation, "Necessity being the mother of invention."

Sorry. . .no idea what this sentence means.

"The Arc Reactor built with scraps is a demonstration of pure genius and ingenuity. The ARMOR wasn't a testament to his genius but defensive practicality."

That scene is one of my favorite in the entire MCU, and was actually *exactly* what I had in mind, when I wrote my initial post. But you're missing the point: it's explicitly intended to show how far beyond everyone else Tony is. They were in a bleeding-edge lab, and he did what they couldn't, "with scraps of metal in a cave."

"It wasn't Stark that figured out paradoxical temporal navigation using Quantum Tunneling it was his AI computer Friday."

No idea why you think this, but you're wrong. That's like saying "I wrote an algorithm to crunch numbers, but I didn't solve this problem." Tony figured it out, by working the problem and running a bunch of simulations. When he created the one that worked, Friday simply informed him of the fact.
The dialogue shortly after should help you:
Tony: "Whatcha readin'?"
Pepper: "Just a book on composting."
Tony: "What's new w/composting?
Pepper: just a. . .
Tony: "I figured it out."
Pepper: "Just so we're talking about the same thing. . ."
Tony: "Time travel."
Pepper: "Wow. . ."

reply

Saying something is lazy is just lazy.

reply

Laziness doesn't deserve fleshed out criticism.

reply

PERHAPS A GIRLFRIEND OR A PET WOULD HELP YOU FIND A LIFE THAT DOESNT INVOLVE EMBARRASSINGLY JUVENILE POSTS LIKE THIS🙂

reply

LOL says the loser who types in caps like a prepubescent boy. Talk about embarrassing.

reply

IM COOL BEING A LOSER...I HAVE A WIFE AND A CHILD...HOWS THAT CORN SNAKE OF YOURS KIDDO?

reply

How does it feel having a child who's more mature than you? Stop typing in caps like you're a 12 year old who just discovered the internet.

reply

MY CHILD IS MORE MATURE THAN ME🙂

reply

What about the time travel in Agents of SHIELD season 7?

reply

How do you feel about discovering time travel after hitting your head on a toilet?

reply

Time travel is the basis of the Back to the Future plot, it wasn't shoehorned in to the third movie to bring back half the characters back to life. Not an apt comparison.

reply

That is true but at the same time they never really go over the physics of how the floxs capacitor actually works or how it relates to time travel, or why the thing has to go 88 Mph to 'activate'. None of this is answered but just glossed over as an assumed plot acceptable device. It is, it works.

I agree that it is not a central plot device in endgame but more 'lazily' thrown in as a gimmick, or a tool, for the means to the end they wanted. Which means the 'effect' of the time travel plot comes across as much harder to accept because it feels just conjured (contrived) in a way it does not in Back to the Future.

But then again MCU is a universe that has a guy that turns large and green when angry, a norse thundergod that carries a hammer that shots lightning and noone but 'worthy' people can left it (what constitutes 'worthy' is never defined), multiple type of aliens and 'gods', deus ex machina magical stones, etc; it is already pretty deep into the extreme fantasy universe much before we get to Time Travel.

reply

Not to mention they have already introduced a Time Stone that allows its owner to travel through time.

reply

Yes that is true; they did have the time stone; but I do not think that one of it's abilities was to allow the user to travel 'through' time. More like fuddle with time as it is now, sort of speak. Like you can slow time and under certain conditions reverse it in the immediate present. But I did not get an indication you could use it to say travel back in time 40 years or 'fast forward' 100 years in the future. of course I could be wrong on this, but i don't think they really specified the limits.

reply

They didn't specify, but we did see Thanos turn back time, resurrect Vision, and reassemble a destroyed Infinity Stone, then continue on with the timeline as if nothing had happened. We don't know exactly what the rules are for an alteration like that via Time Stone. According to the rules set forth in Endgame, had he used Pym Particles to go back in time, he would have caused a split at the moment of Vision's death. In Timeline A, Vision stays dead and the Mind Stone remains destroyed, while everyone in Thanos' reality is now in a new branch in which he has all the Infinity Stones. But that can't be the case, as 100% of the time he shows up late, then uses the Time Stone to turn back time, so the implication is that time travel via Time Stone works differently than time travel via other means, and doesn't cause split timelines.

The above offers a very different take on Dr. Strange's statement about all the timelines he viewed. If he saw 14,000,605 timelines, and only 1 in which they won, it seems highly unlikely that he knew everything after his death would play out as needed. That means he had to know what action was the pivotal one that creates the 1 in 14,000,605 victorious timeline. I am now of the opinion that he delayed an inevitable defeat on Titan, and timed everything to get Thanos the Time Stone at the last possible second, when it was too late to get the Mind Stone without using the Time Stone. Sure, it could have been any little thing that happened between him coming out of his time hunt and his death, but an action that leads to the destruction and recreation of an Infinity Stone strikes me as a 1 in a 14,000,605 event in its own right, and just the sort of event that would be the outlier, "our heroes win," action.

reply

Yeah, you dug into that much more than I would have. Just going through your statement started to get my head spinning about the time loops and contingencies and adverse effects and how the 'parallel universes' can relate or not relate to each other; are 'our heroes' even in their original 'timeline' anymore? I think we are supposed to assume yes; but everything got so tossed and screwy with Thanos being able to 'cross forward' into a universe that was not his; does that mean he no longer exists to carry out any infinity stone quest in that time line? how can that be? The reality of the universes got bent so much that it is too obscure to really get anything tangible out of it. And I think that if you go too far into trying to sort it out you inevitable be disappointed because the answer really is: The writers did not think about it that much. So any inconsistencies is just a result of them 'not thinking' about it when they wrote the scenes and dialogue.

reply

In one sense, they did a better job than any film I've seen at setting a logical rule for time travel: anything you do that causes a change creates a split in the timeline.

If Thanos split the timeline when he brought Vision back to life, that means a timeline exists where Vision stays dead and Thanos doesn't get all the Infinity Stones. Yet, with the Time Stone, he isn't traveling in time as much as he's altering time itself, so I think that one makes sense. The Time Stone controls time itself, whereas traveling in time is something quite different, and altering time shouldn't cause a split timeline.

Yes, when Thanos travels through spacetime at the end of the film, and he and his entire army are dusted, that means in his original timeline he ceases to be. Since Thanos is traveling forward in time, from his own perspective, nothing he does creates a new branch on the timeline, but his death does preclude him from returning to his own time to wreak havoc. If anything, THAT'S the timeline in which the heroes were victorious, albeit through no action on their part. In that timeline, life goes on and no one ever learns about Thanos, no Snapture transpires, etc.

But then that begs the question-- shouldn't Dr. Strange have seen 2 timelines in which they won? Or-- did he identify that as a timeline in which his own group couldn't win? In other words, since he can't switch places with the Dr. Strange in the lucky timeline, he's only looking at what happens to him and his own timeline moving forward from that moment on Titan.

In any event, it all does seem to hold together, and nothing that happens in the film, at least nothing I noticed, breaks the rule set forth by the filmmakers, and that's a pretty remarkable thing to say about a time travel film.

reply

That doesn't 'sit' well with me though from a story telling standpoint; it simply eliminates the 'stakes' and you might as well throw suspense out the window. The heroes and villians can never really fail; if they do they can just enter a different time loop. These means that by the time we even get to infinity war it is no longer the 'original' timeline; but one that split off the first time Dr. Strange started using the Time Stone; then you bring up a good point. He could only see 1 outcome in which they 'won' but they didn't really win; they created a new timeline. Can Dr. Strange even see the possible outcomes of different timelines? Unclear. The more you start to question this stuff the more it falls apart. It might have kept some 'internal' consistency to the film it which it was used; but it does not fit well with the rest of the serious; but the bigger problem is that it basically becomes a deus ex machina device that was called on to solve an unsolvable problem; and basically negated the tension.

Now that being said there was some 'loose' suspension left in Endgame by the fact only the OG Heroes were aware of the 'time travel' possibility. So if Thanos successfully killed them all, and removed that knowledge from use; that would be a 'final' victory for him. But the problem I had with Endgame Thanos is that he did not really rationalize out that goal; it wasn't his objective. It seemed like his objective was more petty revenge and anger at 'contenders'. this simplified objective mad him more brutish and less intimidating.

reply

I don't completely follow your logic. What I think is the case, thought it's not 100% spelled out in the film, is that when someone uses the Time Stone they don't create a new timeline. A new timeline only happens when someone travels back in time, whereas using the Time Stone alters time itself. You aren't so much traveling in time as you are reversing time, so the things that happened un-happen. When the heroes use the Pym Particles to travel back, they are moving to a previous point on an existing timeline, which is why a change creates a new timeline; their future cannot be altered. If they used the Time Stone, they would undo their future, and time restarts wherever they go. But I'm totally making that up because it feels right.

In any event, I sort of see your point about the stakes being reduced, but I don't think I agree. They can fail quite easily, either by failing to accomplish what they went back to do, or dying trying.

Personally, I did not at all like the time travel element. I think it was done partly because it was an easy solution to the problem raised by the end of Infinity War, and mostly as fan service. Let's revisit all the classic moments in this final chapter of the saga. I didn't like that at all, and I didn't like the end, where all the heroes came back and the battle royale ensued. I wasn't at all impressed by Endgame, and was especially disappointed because Infinity War was so incredibly good. I wish they'd either chosen different heroes to have died at the end of Infinity War, and ended it there and just moved on to a new story, or ended Infinity War with something other than Thanos winning, and continuing the story in a second part. Having everyone die, five years pass, and the heroes time travel to undo it wasn't even a happy ending, and it felt messy and forced.

reply

Yeah I think you and I took the same issue with Endgame (we were just explaining it different); the time travel felt like 'quick easy' solution to the impossible problem created by Infinity War's excellent ending in which so many of the heroes were snapped away (deus ex machina); so that felt a little cheap. Also the time travel solution sort of feels like they were actively trying to undo the last film's plot. So that is a little annoying; they were not moving forward with the story they were doing a retrospective and at the same time trying to undo the previous film which was one of the better films in the series; which also felt a little cheap.

reply

You deserve people making fun of you cause you refused to answer to my question. Shame on you

reply

Lol ok buddy. I don't watch SHIELD that's why I didn't answer.

reply

Based on your thread title, you have an issue with the time travel discovery. For a film based on time travel I find it even more egregious. Oh, I bumped my head. Get me plutonium and a shitty car. I have an idea. Ridiculous.

reply

To be fair I think what the OP is saying is that in Endgame it felt contrived and we see Tony just kind of 'figure it out' in a casual almost accidental 'oh I got it' type of moment. in back to the future it was not contrived the same way; it was the premise of the plot to begin with; so it is a little easier to accept even though you and others are correct in pointing out it is 'equally' contrived.

I think it comes down to how it was presented in each film and in Back to the future it was set up as part of the rules of the universe; where in Endgame it was already so far into the 'rules' that this new plot device ends up feeling like a contrived deus ex machina that is pulled in to solve the unsolvable problem of 'reviving' all the dead characters from Infinity War.

Also I think because Infinity war had a pretty epic run and conclusion and Endgame basically felt like a movie that was trying to undo it; sort of like Terminator Genysis, it is trying to undo the 'original' and create its own new timeline. I don't get a sense Back to the future that there are alternative realities; but instead reality changes based on what came before, but there is only 1 reality at a time.

reply

Yeah that was not great; I am not exactly thrilled they went with a 'time travel' angle in the first place to undo the snap. 8.4 is definitely too high; more like maybe 6.5 or so. maybe 7 if we are being generous. There are certainly a lot of problems with Endgame; but it is a 'flawed but satisfying conclusion' to the series. Most 'shows' that go on that long end up having really shitty finales (Dexter, Game of Thrones, Lost, etc).

reply