Would Edward Norton’s Hulk have done better than Mark Ruffalo's Hulk in Avengers: Infinity War?

https://www.quora.com/Would-Edward-Norton-s-Hulk-have-done-better-than-Mark-Ruffalos-Hulk-in-Avengers-Infinity-War/answer/Andre-Xast

If Norton is still Bruce Banner, that means Marvel had given him a semblance of creative control. Which means The Hulk won’t just be beaten in the intro and missing the rest of the movie.

We might see Hulk vs Cull in the New York fight

We might see more about Banner and Natasha (if that goes on)

We might actually see a movie about Planet Hulk, the precursor to Thor: Ragnarok. And that might lead to many things

We might see this in the final battle as it gives a hint to the Green Scar

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-0448f1c16d97da2a674bf93c24b0bc81

We might see Thanos beating down Hulk in the final battle with the infinity stones, giving Hulk the fight he deserves even though he lost.

So yes, Hulk would’ve fared much better if it was Edward Norton, because he would add more Hulk scenes into the story, Hulk wouldn't be reduced into a support character Banner. And Hulk would get more in-depth characterization and screen time.