A 3.4? Oh c'mon
Give me a break. How bad can it be? Maybe they should of left it rated R for Gore and Harsh Language. It probably would've stayed in the 4 range.
shareGive me a break. How bad can it be? Maybe they should of left it rated R for Gore and Harsh Language. It probably would've stayed in the 4 range.
shareEvery Youtube review is saying the movie is complete trash. Man i can't wait to see it.
shareI saw it and thought it was pretty bad. I've seen worse and ppl overreact, but it wasn't, at all, good or decent.
shareNo, it wasn't great, but 3.4s are designated for the tier of movie under this, imo.. I saw it last night, and I feel it was heavily edited, resulting in what we got. There's a lot left unexplained.. That said, I still give this a mid 4, maybe even A 5 depending on what the uncut shows.. Ppl that haven't seen this and gave it a 1 are what's wrong with imdb rating system
shareYou nailed it. There are jerks here who haven't even seen the movie abusing the rating system on imdb. This movie was way better than a 3.4 rating.
shareYeah. The movie actually surprised me. It's actually pretty descent. I give it a 7.5/10. Most of the people voting haven't even seen it, and are basing their ratings off other reviews by the up tight critics who can't enjoy anything that's actually a movie, the name, and the trailer.
shareYou are right! I gave it an 8.
shareHardly a "R" rated movie. I wish they made it an R rated film. At least then it would have been a 5 out of 10
shareI agree, I honestly think people are giving it such a poor rating based on the silly name alone. Most probably haven't seen it yet. I thought it was actually pretty damn good.
Life sucks, Brendon. That's your lesson. Go enjoy it.