I don't understand why so many people hate this movie. I'm a die-hard horror movie fan and nothing scares me anymore, but this one was at least suspenseful.
Allow me to put this in perspective... Too many horror movies these days are incredibly lame. For example, the latest Blair Witch movie, The Forest, Lights Out, Zoombies, and American Conjuring (cringe). These movies are filled with tons of jump scares because there isn't anything else in these movies that is truly horrifying; there's just no substance. But, this movie was horrifying simply because the characters were paralyzed with fear and you felt that fear knowing the monster could attack at any minute. With no weapons and no way out, the mother couldn't protect her child, no help was coming, and it seemed inevitable that they were going to die.
So, the screenwriter of The Monster didn't explain where the monster came from. Do we really need to know? Sometimes "less is more." The movie provoked a good bit of emotions, too, because the mother went from thinking that her daughter was simply an inconvenience in her life to later sacrificing herself to save the child. Was this as good as "The Descent" or Ridley Scott's "Alien" movie? No. But it was far better than most I've seen lately. It is what it is: good entertainment. :)
i thought this movie was pretty good/decent. the acting was VERY good from all (especially the mother/Zoe). the cinematography is beautiful and atmospheric. the creature design/fx IMO were good as well. it was great to see they had the creature be 100% practical fx (or most of it practical fx) rather than crappy CGI.
there were some odd editing choices towards the end that i didn't understand though. when the ambulance has been knocked over/attacked by the creature and the mom is talking her to daughter about what their plan would be, it then abruptly cuts to the mom OUTSIDE/in front of the ambulance (while her voice narration about said plan is still heard to the audience) sort of crawling and looking around but then it once again abruptly cuts back to the inside of the ambulance where both the mom & daughter are talking (about their plan). there were a couple more instances around that scene where that abrupt/confusing editing happened.
but overall a pretty good, low key creature feature!
Well I hate you for giving me the ending of a movie I haven't seen. Probably should thank you for saving a couple hours of my life......Nah. You are just another SPOILER!
This movie, like the other generically titled Horror film by this director, lacks any real substance or depth. The melodramatic tone paired with the aforementioned shallow approach combined to create a rather slow and unsatisfying 90 minute experience.
Just so you know: if knowing the ending is reason enough, for you, for "not going to bother", well... I'm sorry, but you are the idiot (and a moronic one, at that).
Normally no but in a movie with a cast of 7 which consists of 2 people trapped in a car, the end of the movie is quite an big part of the movie. Thanks for your feedback you have a nice day
Shut up rick-fallows, and stop being an unconscionable, boorish troll. You know damn well not to go clicking around in the IMDb Message Boards of a film if you haven't seen it. You're just being a twit, and there are enough of those in the world as it is; we needn't have you adding to the problem.
I stopped myself from reading the end of the original post, but even if I had read it, it's the experience of watching the movie that matters. When my favorite manga's were still being written, I was always up for reading spoilers. Besides. horror and science fiction are my favorite movie genres, so I'm cool with watching a decent monster flick.
To be honest, he didn't tell the end of the movie. He may have told what happens with a character (the mom), but who reads TS will not know anything about the very end of the movie (what happens with the monster and with the daughter).
I watch many movies of this ilk, and I enjoyed this movie, but not as much as, say, "It Follows" or some of the others mentioned that are considered allegories or parables (which I may or may not agree with). I'm not sure how to classify this one tho. Are we to assume the mother and her addictions and lack of mothering skills represent the "Monster?" Or is this more of a literal monster. Neither way seems to make sense. The mother states at one point "you are why I'm here," among other statements that lead me to believe the mother wants to die or commit suicide for the benefit of her daughter. She is "giving" her daughter to the child's father and essentially abandoning her. This is just another form of suicide. The mother realizes there's little or no chance for her to recover so she wants to give the child to the father rather than continue to drag her down into the abyss that is her own. But love transcends the boundaries of hatred the two may have for each other. The mother also states at one point that she will die very soon anyway whether or not she stays behind to be with her daughter or goes out and confronts the monster (her addition? or another type of monster?). She exhibits great bravery (or stupidity) at several points. To me, that means she's ready to die and even welcomes it. But there are flaws. Why would the tow-truck driver park so far away from their car and not leave his hazard lights on--especially on a dark road in the pouring rain? It wouldn't happen. Does the tow truck driver represent past help she has refused. And who in their right mind would relinquish their belongs to a creepy (but nice) tow-truck driver knowing they plan to stay in the car. Horror is all about the unknown, and therefore my favorite, and I declare the best, are the ones that leave more unknown than known. But this movie is a little schizophrenic. When I ponder what might be going on my imagination stagnates and falls asleep quickly. It doesn't keep me wondering hours or days or weeks or more after I've left the theatre, and it doesn't leave me with the desire to rush back the the theatre a second time so that I can relive those horrific feelings that movies (and books) of this genre give us that we love so much.
billorr, i don't mean this in a mean way...i'd like to read what you posted but the enormous wall of text makes reading it a strain on the eyes. paragraphs are a good thing. just sayin'. :)
I'm flattered you would be interested enough in what I wrote to ask for help understanding it, but alas, if you were really that interested, you would have gone to the trouble on your own to pick apart my rambling thoughts and sprinkle paragraphs here and there, but then again, if you were capable of understanding what I wrote, you wouldn't need paragraph marks to guide you, but according to that reasoning, you are knowledgeable enough to realize that paragraphs will likely help you interpret the message I attempt to convey.
I watch many movies of this ilk, and I enjoyed this movie, but not as much as, say, "It Follows" or some of the others mentioned that are considered allegories or parables (which I may or may not agree with). I'm not sure how to classify this one tho. Are we to assume the mother and her addictions and lack of mothering skills represent the "Monster?" Or is this more of a literal monster. Neither way seems to make sense.
The mother states at one point "you are why I'm here," among other statements that lead me to believe the mother wants to die or commit suicide for the benefit of her daughter. She is "giving" her daughter to the child's father and essentially abandoning her. This is just another form of suicide. The mother realizes there's little or no chance for her to recover so she wants to give the child to the father rather than continue to drag her down into the abyss that is her own.
But love transcends the boundaries of hatred the two may have for each other. The mother also states at one point that she will die very soon anyway whether or not she stays behind to be with her daughter or goes out and confronts the monster (her addition? or another type of monster?). She exhibits great bravery (or stupidity) at several points. To me, that means she's ready to die and even welcomes it.
But there are flaws. Why would the tow-truck driver park so far away from their car and not leave his hazard lights on--especially on a dark road in the pouring rain? It wouldn't happen. Does the tow truck driver represent past help she has refused. And who in their right mind would relinquish their belongs to a creepy (but nice) tow-truck driver knowing they plan to stay in the car.
Horror is all about the unknown, and therefore my favorite, and I declare the best, are the ones that leave more unknown than known. But this movie is a little schizophrenic. When I ponder what might be going on my imagination stagnates and falls asleep quickly. It doesn't keep me wondering hours or days or weeks or more after I've left the theatre, and it doesn't leave me with the desire to rush back the the theatre a second time so that I can relive those horrific feelings that movies (and books) of this genre give us that we love so much.
*SPOILERS* the monster isn't a physical manifestation of the mother and her troubles - it's a manifestation of the abuse and now abandonment felt by THE GIRL. despite all the horror of the mother's addiction her daughter still loves her, but now she's also being sent away - and she snaps. the people who die are actual people who die. the girl is the one left standing and is the one who kills the creature because she decides she doesn't want to be carrying that pain around with her, and she doesn't deserve to. so the way i see it the cops will show up and find what looks like a frenzied bear attack, and will have a bunch of questions they'll never have proper answers to.
____________________________________ "...needless to say, I had the last laugh."
I think your analysis is very interesting; only one part does not fit:
...The mother also states at one point that she will die very soon anyway whether or not she stays behind to be with her daughter or goes out and confronts the monster...
No other meaning, but the literal one, was to be found here. She was dying due to her wounds.
reply share