What's the 'male genital nudity' in this movie?

It's completely ridiculous, but you're arguing with someone who thinks it's clever to say 'Hollyweird,' so what do you expect?

izay142: Your arguments are deeply flawed and illogical. You cannot compare breast nudity (which is NON-GENITAL NUDITY) to a lingering, up close shot of male genitalia. You're comparing apples to oranges. Showing EQUAL NUDITY means showing equivelant nudity. Thus, non-genital male genital nudity (ass) and non-genital female nudity (ass or breasts), or male genital nudity (penis and testicles) for female genital nudity (clitoris and vulva). If they can show an exploitative close-up of the male genitalia, I don't see why they shouldn't show an equally graphic close-up of female genitalia. (the vulva). A woman does NOT need to be "spread eagle" to expose her genitalia; she only needs to be in a normal position where her legs are apart and she's not hiding her genitalia. Plus, if they can zoom in on a man's penis, then why not zoom in between a woman's legs at her vulva?

Your comparison to an erect penis is also incorrect. When a penis is erect, then its clearly sexualized, and is in a "penetratable" state. That's equivelant to showing a vulva in a state of penetration, or, at least, being spread open pink so the wet pussy can be seen. They don't show penetrated vulvas or spread pussies, so they shouldn't show erect penises. Those things are equivelant. But a flaccid penis is the same as a vulva which is not being spread open or penetrated. Its just part of a woman's normal body. Its just a women's genitalia. If male genitalia can be shown in mainstream movies, then Hollywood should be equally willing to show female genitalia in mainstream movies as well.

As for the whole B.S "women have been exploited for years" argument, that is TOTAL CRAP. For every movie a moron like you can name where a woman was 'exploited" by showing her NON-GENITAL NUDITY, I can name a movie where a man's non-genital nudity was shown also. As for genital nudity, the ratios are completely skewed against men in this regard. There are hundreds of mainstream films that have shown full male genital nudity over the years, and only a few that have shown full female genital nudity. There are NO FILMS PASSED WITH AN R-RATING THAT HAVE RUN IN MAINSTREAM THEATERS IN THE USA THAT SHOWED A TEN SECOND CLOSE-UP OF FEMALE GENITALIA. The argument you mindlessly parrot about "female exploitation" is just propaganda espoused by the feminist agenda and accepted by gullible minds that lack the critical thinking skills to engage in any fact-checking. The Hollyweird studios do have an obvious liberal, pro-homosexual, pro-feminist agenda to try to mainstream the portrayal of male genitalia, while concurrently playing "politically correct" and keeping female genitalia taboo in mainstream cinema. Its a garbage double-standard and it needs to end. Happily, these comedies that have been pushing this agenda have been continually underperforming at the box office and,sooner or later, the douchebags who run the big studios are going to get sick of losing millions of dollars and abandon this political agenda, and give the paying public what it wants. The market wants funny comedies with good plots and, if there is graphic nudity, most people want it to be FEMALE GENITAL NUDITY, GODDAMMIT. They would have sold a lot more tickets and future DVD sales would be much higher if it was a 10 second pussy close-up instead. However, the decision-makers were feminist A-holes like Judd Apatow and so they wrote in an unnecessary, gratuitous, and exploitative dick scene that nobody in the audience really wanted. (other than a couple of homosexuals). So they will lose millions, the studios will soon get tired of them (along with that douchebag Baron Sacha Cohen), and they will end up like so much wreckage on the sea shore, to be replaced by heterosexual pro-male directors who will put good pussy in mainstream raunchy comedies in the future.

You're YET ANOTHER DEFENDER of this men hating sexist situation and I want answers from you. This is the THIRD time I've replied to your warped view of this whole subjuect and I will tell you again: THERE IS NOTHING MORE SEXIST AND OBJECTIFIED THAN A CLOSE UP OF GENITALS. THE ONLY CLOSE UP OF GENITALS WE EVER SEE FROM HOLLYWEIRD AND AMERICAN TV IS A MAN'S, NEVER A WOMAN'S!!!!