Do they really..


have sex in it? or it's a body double? if the actors did it.. how come they could face each other afterwards?

reply

What's the big deal? It's just f_cking. And guess what, they do it over a dozen times, not one time. No body doubles were used, all the f_cking is real.

reply

You're assuming they got each scene on the first take 
Oh, actually you did say 'over'.


I'm like a rabbit suddenly trapped
In the blinding headlights of vacuous crap.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

try telling that to the girlfriend you innocently brought in for a date! Remember Taxi Driver??

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

SCAM SCAM SCAM

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Yes. If you look really closely you can see the pee-pee entering the va-jay-jay so it musta been real.

reply

I dont see what's the big deal either. You have sex, dont you?

I wish more "regular" movies have this aproach

reply

maybe some people don't like seeing some things on screen? idiot.

reply

What a childish answer.



Zardoz (1974) has spoken!
My top 100 http://www.imdb.com/list/ls079512886/

reply

I've got an idea if that's true. Those people probably shouldn't watch a movie like this, considering it's made painfully clear that's what they will see

"I've been practicing your arcane western healing arts on my blind neighbor, Simon"

reply

THEN YOU DON'T CHOOSE THIS TYPE OF FILM - what are you, a NAZI CENSOR?? Like "too much sex on TV", well then you're are picking the WRONG programs for YOU, they are FINE for someone else..

I HATE TELEVANGELISTS ON TV< they should be banned, but I realize gullible idiots need to see GOD on TV as well since they can't see imaginary beings in REAL LIFE

My only regret in life is that I'm not someone else - Woody Allen

reply

What's the big deal?! Lol, no wonder stds are so rampant with this type of cavalier attitude. Charlie Sheen, anyone? And what does Sheen do for a living? He acts. So, yes, it isn't something to scoff at to see actors have unsimulated sex on screen while not being experienced pornographers who screen for this on a regular basis. And then there are other factors to consider such as, are any of the actors involved married or have a serious relationship and if so, how are THEIR feelings being considered in that situation? Then you have the fact that the actors' bodies are being exploited in the name of art and that it will come at a price to their reputations. Is that their problem? You can look at it that way but one can also look at it as "I hope my son or my daughter doesn't go that route when they become adults" but with media pushing all this as cool, hip, and inconsequential, they might be drawn to do something like that. I'm not a prude and I've seen this film, so I realize the irony in how I come across in this post. However, I think there is a disservice being done to brush this off as harmless cinema. It isn't.

reply

It's up to the actors

reply

There are also a lot of people who are exploited in the name of business and commerce: sleeping with a boss or mentor or client, etc. There's plenty of that going on and always has. Many of the people involved in those situations are married or in a serious relationship (in theory).

reply

I think you got off at the wrong exit, Puritanville is 95b, this is 95a.

reply

Everyone takes sh*ts, right? Why not film them taking sh*ts? There's really no reason to have non-simulated sex. They're actors, so why can't they act like they're having sex just like they would act doing anything else?

reply

You are comparing taking a *beep* to sex?

Yes, every human *beep* and every human has sex. But there are layers to sexuality that can be explored in cinema, you can't really explore someone taking a *beep* There are no emotional complexities in that scenario, unless you are really in love with your own *beep*

You could just not watch it.

reply

This is in the context of non-simulated sex in film, not sex on film in general.

reply

I meant sex unsimulated or not, it makes no difference. It's all about context, really. And how it is handled.

reply

If it's non-simulated, it's not really acting then is it?

reply

Actually it is, the emotions are acted just like when two actors kiss, they don't pretend they are kissing now do they ? They kiss cuz they're characters are in love but they are not so they are acting in love while really kissing.

Same thing

reply

Google "coprophilia." 😉

reply

But there are layers to sexuality that can be explored in cinema, you can't really explore someone taking a *beep* There are no emotional complexities in that scenario,


What are you talking about? What about the scenario of someone really having to go to the bathroom but it's occupied? Wouldn't that scenario reflect tension, angst, urgency and worry? Couldn't someone ponder on WHY those emotions are elicited while the bathroom is occupied?

How about the anxiety of whether or not to go before or after a date? There's a whole meta-layer of complexity attached with the timing. If you go too early before the date you could be late, and it could ruin a potential future relationship. If you want 'till after, you could get constipated and end up sitting there on the can for hours on end, losing sleep and productivity.

Those are just two of the multitude of scenarios involved with feeding the porcelain mouth an assortment of chocolate from the human hole factory.

reply

Why are you so afraid of sex?

reply

I'm not. I'm taking about how non-simulated sex on film is unnecessary.

reply

But why do you think it's "unnecessary"? What's the harm/danger?

reply

try telling your date you brought to the flicks for a quite night out that you had no idea this was porn. She'll clobber you and call you stupid, just like Taxi Driver.

reply

Porn is just a word used by those who want to degrade and censor the human body. Anyone who has a problem with seeing the naked human body, has a problem with seeing the naked human body. And that's utterly insane!

I watched this together with my girlfriend, and since she is not a crazy psycho chick, she had no problem at all with the sex scenes. Rather, she complained that the actor playing the main character was not charismatic enough to pull off the role of lovable a$$hole.

reply

You should see "Severed Ways"


"Weirdness was all he cared about. Weirdness and sex and plenty to drink."

reply

if the actors did it.. how come they could face each other afterwards?


Yeah indeed because after sex you can't face each other right?...like....it would be so akward.I mean common facing someone after you had sex with them we does that....Only...like...whores and porn actors or something...right?

reply

What sort of horrible, shameful things do you inflict on your partner during sex that would leave you unable to face your lover (victim?) afterwards?

reply

not cleaning your room before having her over.

reply

I don't think there is unsimulated sex. Maybe he inserts in the baby-making scene, but the only time we see true gratification is when the actor is getting a handjob or a blowjob. Even the cunnilingus is simulated.

reply

Director and main charatcer have both been open about it. It's REAL. They shot the sex scenes first to get that part done before the bigger crew came aboard and regular production started.

---------------------------------
* My God!.. Its Full of Stars! *

reply

"how can they face each other afterwards..." __ WOW - you need some serious psychotherapy!! THIs is the most basic, natural HUMAN thing there is, procreation, without that NO HUMAN RACE...

Anyone embarassed or turned off is either asexual, too moralistic, a child, emotionally disturbed -- or maybe you come from a repressive culture


My only regret in life is that I'm not someone else - Woody Allen

reply