No Heart is back, and his first order of business is hacking open Tender Heart bear's chest with a machete! The bears are brutally slaughtered and devoured y his hulking 15-foot-tall demon monstrosity, Beastly... or their heads are exploded by the sonic wave attacks of the his half-Siren mutant niece, Shrieky.
It's up to a crack team of... teenage crack addicts... from Chicago... to gun down the evil team in the name of caring!
I know you're trying to be funny but I'd seriously be interested in a dark Neverending Story, or a show that's like Once Upon a Time and uses any fairy tales in the public domain, but make it a dark and nightmarish version compared to the lightness of ABC's show...
Edith Nesbit's books are in the public domain as well and I adored those books growing up, I'd take a dark and adult adaptation of either of them, as long as they kept the characters as children, because who doesn't love seeing children fight for their lives?
___
"No! He is imprinted on you like a gay duckling. If you don't wean him off you slowly, he'll die."
Oh, I agree. And anyone who has been a part of the ouat fandom for any length of time knows that that show looses viewers by the episode because the fans are sick of how rumplestiltskin treats belle. Apparently the wicked witch runs a brothel in this one....as apposed to commanding an army like she did in the 1939 movie. to me, that doesn't respect Baum's vision, he didn't even want romance in his works! Plus he wrote this book as a specifically feminist work. I think I will wait for lost in oz to drop all its episodes on prime and for the wicked movie
As far as the neverending story is concerned, didn't you know that it was a novel before it wasa movie? And the novel is waaaaayyyyy better! Michael ended was actually very angry about the film.
The point about Neverending Story was that it was fairly dark as it was, both movie and book.
Therefore, we have at least some thematic preservation.
This travesty, on the other hand, is akin to turning Disney's "Alladin" into "Wish Master". This series and the original Oz books are so radically different in tone and characterization and setting... they don't feel at all the same other than the character and place names, any more than the awful "Through the Looking Glass" felt at all like the Lewis Carrol book it stole the name from.
What is termed 'reimagining' is just a lazy way for hack writers to dress up their shoddy ideas with nostalgia-linked classics.
Disney isn't the original source for Aladdin. That story came from the 1001 Nights collection of stories with the connecting thread about the sultan who married and murdered a concubine every day as payback against womanhood over the one woman who betrayed him.
The source material for most of Disney's beloved "childhood" classics is pretty dark. Ever read the original Hunchback of Notre Dame? Whoever thought that book could be turned into a story suitable for children was on some serious drugs.
_____ Strip away the phony tinsel of Hollywood and you find the real tinsel underneath.
Hence why I specifically said "DISNEY'S ALADDIN", which they would 'darken' by making sure to link it with the popular nostalgia surrounding that film so as not to (as they would believe) completely alienate the audience while introducing all manner of 'adult' themes.
That's the pattern with this sort of nonsense.
Perhaps a better example would be turning "Toy Story" into "Child's Play".
There are simply some stories best left alone. Also, the "Hunchback" was a serious dramatic story FIRST. And the kiddie movie adaptation was... mediocre at best. It only strengthens my point that caution need be exercised when 'adapting' stories outside their original theme.
That said, your other comment bring up the brothers Grimm, who were quite good at adapting and combining the variations of local tales and legends from all over Europe. That their versions have stood the test of time for so long is testament to their skill at the craft.
But we must also keep in mind that their stories were short fairytales (sometimes barely a full page), which lend themselves easily to reworking into movie-length so long as the core narrative is preserved. A number = of their stories were extremely similar thematically, and were likely very distant versions of the same root tale retold until they'd diverged enough to be considered 'different' stories. "The Singing, Soaring Lark" bears great similarity to "Beauty and the Beast" in many central details in the first halves of both stories. Even the film versions of "Snow White" and "Cinderella" retained some elements of drama and there was no illusion of who the villains were. I would also posit that the rather blunt violence in the 'originals' would be off-putting and feel oddly contrasting with the whimsical portions of the stories in the minds of viewers, not only today, but for the past hundred years... hence the changes made by Walt. These stories were made 'adult', in fact, not by making them 'dark', but by using very mature notions of unified theme and tone and plot progression, notions that young children who eagerly sat in their beds listening to parents telling to old tales, waiting for the wicked Queen and the stepmother and stepsisters to 'get what was coming to them', would not usually appreciate or comprehend.
Today, however, 'adult' seems to be uniformly associated with making everything brutal, hyper-sexualized, bleak, and miserable... perhaps a bit of a psychological leak from the minds of the shallow Hollywood types?
Perhaps what would work better as far as retellings and reinterpretations are concerned would be stories re-written by real adults rather than spoiled old children.
Good writing is hard. Hollywood executives tend to favor flashy, trendy notions rather than timeless quality. From what I have gathered, writers in Hollywood are not usually paid all that well, are given little respect, are constantly forced to rewrite what happens in their story according to the executives' whims of the day, and are subject to being replaced at a moment's notice if they don't want to incorporate the latest trendy idea that the executives demand they shoehorn into their work. In such an atmosphere, it's not surprising that a lot of work coming out of Hollywood has inferior writing.
Nevertheless, I am willing to give this work a chance to show that it has something worthwhile to offer.
I understand what you're saying about inferior writers capitalizing on the nostalgia surrounding established works. I don't think that's ever going to go away. If that's all a work has to offer, it's not likely to do all that well.
But there are some marvelously creative people out there, and although it might be worthwhile to warn them of the difficulties with such projects, I'm not going to tell them that they shouldn't try their own take on a work just because I have fond memories of it. Lots of times it won't work, but some of the time it can. I'd rather keep the successes, even if it means tolerating the existence of the failures. After all, no matter what restrictions are or aren't placed on writers, most writers are going to produce absolute crap most of the time.
_____ Strip away the phony tinsel of Hollywood and you find the real tinsel underneath.
The film of Neverending Story was very good. But it only covered the first part of the book. The sequels went completely off the rails and were progressively inferior.
_____ Strip away the phony tinsel of Hollywood and you find the real tinsel underneath.
If you want dark and nightmarish fairy tales, just ignore Disney and go back to the oldest written versions we have.
In Cinderella, her stepsisters cut pieces off their feet in their attempts to fit into that shoe. They were betrayed by the blood coming out of the shoe.
In Snow White, the wicked queen had red hot iron shoes put on her feet and was forced to dance in them at Snow White's wedding until the wicked queen fell down dead.
Then there's the charming tale of cannibalism known as Hansel and Gretel.
And if you think Grimm's fairytales were bad, wait until you hear the earlier story of Sleeping Beauty before they sanitized it. Not to mention how the Grimm brothers changed all the murderous mothers into murderous stepmothers because the idea of mothers murdering their own children was so disturbing to them.
_____ Strip away the phony tinsel of Hollywood and you find the real tinsel underneath.
See? Now why can't we have more stories like that being made into movies?
I'm familiar with the originals you're referring to. Everything gets so sugar coated and watered down.
Granted an adult viewing audience would/may be receptive to different versions, although that doesn't seem to be going over too well even on this flick.
______________________________________ And I stepped on the ping pong ball!