I'm going to vomit - I Slept with 100 Men in One Day (2024) Discussion

[–] CaptBeefBlower (329) a month ago

"It’s just one in one out, it feels intense."

Well, you don't say!

Annabel Chong fucked 251 men in 10 hours back in 1995, so this isn't even a record. These OnlyFans slags are at least making money though - Chong was never paid.

reply

[–] mitzibishi (1945) a month ago

No doubt the all the men taking part will be blamed.

When this woman feels regret, she will have the police tracking down all the men, bashing in their doors and rounding them up to be prisoned for rape.

Somehow she was coerced and manipulated by men in her onlyfans chat or something

reply

[–] Kowalski (76824) a month ago

FALSE.

reply

[–] mitzibishi (1945) a month ago

When she's all hagged out in a few years, alone, probably a kid from a failed relationship who hates her because they are being bullied at school over their mother past. People recognise her, and other women shame her, she will regret and blame it all on the men.

She "owns" it now like a "boss lady". Watch this space to see if she is "owning" it in 20 years or blaming everybody else for her poor decision-making.

reply

[–] strntz (12669) a month ago

I just red a NY Post article on this after reading this here, and they say the world record is over 900!

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39073) 10 days ago

That was me.

reply

[–] stickman38 (3415) a month ago

What app is this doc on?

reply

[–] mitzibishi (1945) a month ago

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFySAh0g-MI

One guy is shaking after. The others sound like they are troubled people.

Men brought in like cattle, then discarded. Had to pay for their own flights, hotels and even their own health tests.

Let's just say she found some "cheap labour". Nobody got paid. Apart from Lily.

Most sound like troubled, vulnerable individuals that probably need mental help.
Wonder how they were manipulated into flying to a different country just to be close to a woman and have some human contact.

I wonder if they were in receipt of Lilys health test?

reply

[–] stickman38 (3415) 20 days ago

I watched it, not sure how you came to the conclusion that the men need mental help? lol. ..

They don't even show their faces, they're censored and they don't say much during the interviews either. And the fact that they covered all of their own expenses is not surprising. Men will do crazy stuff to get laid, most won't pass up a meal.

In regards to Lily, I would have to say she's a nymphomaniac. Or "sex addict" might be another term I would use to describe her. People that do things this far outside of the norm are usually setting themselves up for disappointment or worse, death or severe injury. Most women won't sleep with 100 guys in a lifetime much less in a single day. And she doesn't even know how STD's are transmitted. In that one scene, she was like "ohh you can get it doing that"??? in regards to oral sex, wow... just wow...

But you know, it's like the bungee jumper that keeps taking greater risks 'for a thrill' or the hang glider that doesn't care how hard the wind is blowing.. etc..etc.. the TV show 'Jackass' is a good example of people doing stupid crap for a thrill.

There are so many risky behaviors out there, I kind of view this as another one. Still, at her age, she is allowed to make her own mistakes and hopefully learn from it. Perhaps she will learn something before she ends up in serious trouble.

reply

[–] mitzibishi (1945) 20 days ago

Oh boy, here we go.

Part 1 of many.

Would a sane man travel to a different country, or even get on the bus longer than 15 minutes to put their penis into a woman for 5 whole minutes?

5 minutes worth of pumps? They are so desperate for human contact they would book a flight, and hotel, as well as navigating around a foreign city just to be inside a woman for 5 whole minutes.

5 minutes!

With a bang average woman. In a room full of people. Queing naked.

Does that really sound like a man on top of his game?

I will now witness YOU clutch at straws: part 1.

reply

[–] Pete314 (3104) 19 days ago

With 1000 men a day it's even worse. That's 86.4 seconds per guy. Compared to this 5 mins are really comfortable. 🙂

reply

[–] mitzibishi (1945) 19 days ago

She won't get 1000.

She could barely get 100 as there were tons of drop-outs and she had to settle with men who didn't even send their health checks as she says in the documentary "We're going to prioritise the ones with a health check"

All organised by text last minute so she gets the job done.

reply

[–] Pete314 (3104) 19 days ago

Don't know whether it's the same woman but there is one planning to open her legs for 1000 men on one day soon...

reply

[–] stickman38 (3415) 19 days ago

The point is, we know almost nothing about the guys, they were censored, their voices were altered, the interviews with'em were very short, sometimes less than a minute.

To evaluate someone, you need more information about them. A psychiatrist wouldn't even try to figure them out.

We know more about Lily since her interview was much longer and more detailed. Still, it would be hard to evaluate her too from a short 1 hour video.

Either way, I don't see this as a good "hobby" for anyone. And next, she plans on doing it with 1000 guys in a day. We'll see if she actually goes through with it.

reply

[–] mitzibishi (1945) 19 days ago

>we know almost nothing about the guys

Erm. They are not going to the shops to buy groceries.

We have a whole boat load of context showing multiple RED FLAGS.

Do you really think men at the top of their game would risk their health, and humiliate themselves just to spend a measly 5 minutes with an average looking, mildly attractive woman from Onlyfans?

She's hardly unobtainable in the real world. She looks like an average girl that could be stacking shelves in Wallmart. It's not as if Salma Hyek from Dusk Till Dawn put out a call, and it was a one in a million chance with an 11 out of 10. The desperation is a red flag.

As the documentary shows, there were a lot of drop-outs, the guys that came to their senses. Remaining were the most desperate. The saddest acts on the planet that day. A few didn't even send their health check as she says "We're going to prioritise the ones with a health check". I can't imagine the state of the dregs that turned up without bothering to get a health check for 5 minutes with little miss average.

In the documentary, one guy was shaking after. Post nut clarity. Worried that his dad would kick him out. Sounds like a well to do average bloke to you?

Another was talking about his risky behaviour. To paraphrase; "i do things without thinking about the consequences later". A sound minded individual indeed.

Men who would humiliate themselves by standing in a queue naked. Men so desperate for a woman's touch that they would have sex in a room full of people. For only 5 minutes, not even long enough to nut.

Sad, desperate men indeed. Red flags everywhere.

>Still, it would be hard to evaluate her too from a short 1 hour video.

She's an active porn star with scenes filmed in California. Has a company in her name since 2021.
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13175441/filing-history

She's not just a simple, local "onlyfans girl".

She wanted to get famous and took advantage of troubled, sad, lonely desperate, vulnerable men, no matter how hard to try to spin her sweet innocence.

When men are that desperate for a human connection, they are VULNERABLE.

No wonder male suicide rates are sky-high with your dismissive attitude to men's mental health. Trying to get people to admit that a man is VULNERABLE is almost impossible.

The fact is..........she was in a position of POWER.

Her and her team had access to sad, lonely, desperate, VULNERABLE men, and she ABUSED her position of POWER to use the men to make money. Then she discarded them.

reply

[–] stickman38 (3415) 17 days ago

>>>Do you really think men at the top of their game would risk their health, and humiliate themselves<<<

People do it all the time, it doesn't make them "mental cases" though. But it appears as though you want to debate this topic. I would debate this with you, but I don't find it to be a very interesting subject.

However, I'm sure the American Psychiatric Association would like to get to know you. You seem to have a knack for spotting crazy people based on a short 1 minute interview and a single random sexual encounter. They would be interested in knowing about the techniques you're using to come to these conclusions. I mean, all 100 guys in this documentary are nuts, right?? Interesting perspective.... give them a call.

>>> She looks like an average girl that could be stacking shelves in Wallmart.<<<

'Walmart' is spelled with one "L" not two. Looks are highly subjective, I would say based on this image here - https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.hJTrA8CJvsjcWnhEvJ-D2QAAAA?rs=1&pid=ImgDetMain

Lily is an above average looking girl. Plenty of men would drive across the country to sleep with her. The male sex drive is quite strong, research indicates that men think about sex every 7 seconds. lol... not sure I really believe that but I suppose some do.

Its not that shocking that a group of guys would line up to sleep with her.

And yeah, I did consider that she's putting on an act, and pretending to be the ditzy blond but in my opinion, I don't think that's an attractive attribute. But apparently a lot of guys do think it is. I can kind of understand it, I mean, some guys might not want a woman that sounds like a Mensa member, but rather, the fun, free spirited, half-wit type has it's place too. Again, I kind of view her as someone that's willing to take risks. Being an astronaut, a firefighter, a police officer, etc.. all have their risks too.

They say the most dangerous job in the world is commercial fisherman. They get killed all the time, are they "crazy" for taking the job?

reply

[–] mitzibishi (1945) 12 days ago

>People do it all the time, it doesn't make them "mental cases" though.

Depends on the "context" mate. One you conveniently keep trying to brush aside.

Which makes you extremely dumb and naive, or extremely disingenuous. So much so that you don't even have good faith in your argument that you continuously avoid one small point called "context" within actions.

>'Walmart' is spelled with one "L" not two

Resorting to spellchecking now?

>You seem to have a knack for spotting crazy people

Your lack of acceptance that any of these men can be vulnerable, and could have been manipulated, is disturbing.

>Lily is an above average looking girl.

In your eyes.

>Its not that shocking that a group of guys would line up to sleep with her.

Sad, desperate, lonely men manipulated into humiliating themselves for a mere 5 minutes and risking AIDs and other sexually transmitted diseases. Then escorted out of the room after the 5-minute bell rung.

Dear boy, you conveniently forgot the "context" again.

>They say the most dangerous job in the world is commercial fisherman.

huh, you're blabbering. Apples and oranges, and completely different "context".....again.

Fisher people get on boats and catch fish to eat and sell.

Sad lonely, desperate. VULNERABLE men get manipulated and lured to queue with similar men, who as the documentary shows may not have handed in their STD tests and she said to paraphrase "they can come anywhere", and she claimed that she didn't know how AIDS worked, so these men are at very high risk. The men then stand naked in a room full of people humiliating themselves for a 5-minute sniff of little miss average, desperately hoping they get their turn to experience the touch of a human woman for only 5 minutes. They are then sent packing after only 5 minutes with the fear of AIDS over their heads.

Hardly catching fish now is it.

Do you finally understand the word "context" or are we going to play this game forever?

reply

[–] BeaSouth (3475) 11 days ago

The way you’re putting it, I have to agree the whole thing is shameful and fetid. I also agree with your prediction she will be trying to sue someone over it in 20 years.

reply

[–] stickman38 (3415) 10 days ago

Here we go, resorting to name-calling.

Like I said, you pretentious fucking wanker, this is not a very interesting topic, I'm not sure why you think this is worth debating?

>>>Depends on the "context" mate.<<<

No it doesn't. No shrink in the world would even try to make the claim that the men in this doc are "mental cases" they wouldn't even claim Lily is either. What are your qualifications for making such a statement? It takes time and a thorough evaluation to reach these conclusions, and I can tell by the idiotic comments and 1st grade level mistakes you're making in here that you're not qualified to make assertions like this.

That being said, I think we can all agree that it is questionable behavior, maybe even borderline shady but that is perhaps a societal view on it too. Sexuality has a pretty big stigmatization attached to it. At the end of the day, should anyone really be worried about group sex? Probably not... the ones involved in it are taking all the risks. I won't be losing any sleep over Lily's little escapade, will you?

Fact is, gang bang porn and group sex is nothing new. You should take a look at that website/keyword search 'Czech GangBang'. It's full of girls just lining up to get railed by 50-100 men. And listen buddy, its not hard for them to find guys that will do it.

reply

[–] mitzibishi (1945) 6 days ago

>you pretentious fucking wanker,

Continuous name-calling because you're out of the game.

>this is not a very interesting topic, I'm not sure why you think this is worth debating?

How many weeks have you been replying in my thread to defend a random hag lady from the internet?

Me thinks you doth protest to mucheth!

>>>Depends on the "context" mate.<<<

No it doesn't.

oh, but it does. Context within actions, multiple actions, mean a great deal. Somebody stealing a chocolate bar from "Wallmart" isn't the same as somebody holding up a bank and killing a couple of people in the process.

There are many more barriers crossed, more moving parts, higher risks and higher reward.

Except in this case the reward was a paltry 2, to 3 minutes with a hag lady and getting to be the front-runner in the AIDS race.

She clearly stated in the documentary, "We'll prioritise people with tests"

Why even say that if everybody had their tests!!!!

The documentarian clearly states "many men are cancelling" probably because she rug pulled on the day to let them know her advertisement for "F A FAN" was fake, and she was only letting them have 5 minutes. The documentarian also says that due to the amount of cancellations, he doesn't know how the guys they find at the last minute will get STI checks in time.

The first man arriving (in the documentary you didn't watch) only found out that morning. Not enough to time to bring a STI test. I'm betting he was number 1.

She also said the men can come anywhere they wanted! In her mouth, anywhere.

As well as saying that she didn't know how AIDS worked, even though she's been active in porn for years with multiple sessions filmed in California! How on earth does she not know how AIDS works!

She's a LIAR. And a manipulator if you cared to view the documentary, but you didn't bother, proven by your false claims that there were no 5 minute time limits set.

Your inability to consider any of these men or any man as VULNERABLE, or believe that they could have been MANIPULATED, is disturbing and there is no wonder that men's mental health and suicide rates are sky-high.

Please retrieve your empathy chip and pop it back in.

She will clearly say anything at any time to get what she wants. This hag lady even admits in the documentary that she rug pulled them on the paltry time limit of 5 minutes. Manipulating them into thinking they had longer. Sad, lonely, desperate men, travelled great distances to only have 5 minutes of human contact with a woman, to be then told the game had changed. She also claimed STI tests, but that went out of the window as the day progressed and people dropped out. So she decided to pull the health and safety rug just to achieve her goal.

Then another last minute rug pull when she tells the men they only have 2 to 3 minutes, and not the 5 minutes she used to hook them in. Her advertising before that did not say only 5 minutes. Her advertising said "F a Fan".

Lilly kept pulling rugs every step of the way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFySAh0g-MI&t=1780s&ab_channel=JoshPieters

Then on the day it was determined 5 minutes only, and many men cancelled.

In the docu it was stated 5 times that the men only had 5 minutes. And she let slip twice that the men were told of the changes in the room when they were naked and vulnerable.

Then the hag lady has the gall to fake cry about "not pleasing them".

She also lies about condoms on or off at the very end of the docu, and greeting each man to take their coat.

After hours of dick, she was not taking each person's coat or doing small talk as she claims. If you bothered to watch the docu she says she disassociated and became robotic by #30. She lies and had a canned response which she again contradicts or contra-dicks as she does in every step of this short docu. She also lies about cumming everywhere, saying her eyes are watering because of all of the cum on her face, instead of the real reason, crying from regret.

How does she honestly believe that 2 to 3 minutes would be enough time to make men cum in a stink room, which almost made the cameraman puke.

Additionally, without AIDS checks, and after 8 hours, this lady was not allowing cum anywhere. She wanted men in and out of the room within 2 minutes, and she certainly wasn't making pleasantries on hour 8 and beyond like she claims.

Fake. Phoney. Lies. Deceit. Manipulation of VULNERABLE men.

website/keyword search 'Czech GangBang

ha haaa haaaaa!

reply

[–] stickman38 (3415) 5 days ago

Go away, Mitzi. You're boring and so is this topic.

reply

[–] mitzibishi (1945) 5 days ago

The ultimate retort. When defeated, call somebody "boring".

Just admit that men can be vulnerable. They can be manipulated.

That Lilly hag lady was in a position of power.

If you cared to watch the documentary, you will see she prepped her script to say one thing, then contradicts herself completely a minute later.

Lilly LIES. That's all we need to know.

reply

[–] stickman38 (3415) 4 days ago

>>>That Lilly hag lady was in a position of power.<<<

How dare you call Lily a "hag". She provides a much needed service for men around the world. Like I said before, she is a perfect example of an outstanding member of society.

And who are you? A limp dick queer that feels sorry for the men in this documentary. Pathetic...

reply

[–] mitzibishi (1945) 3 days ago

Just admit that men can be vulnerable.

No wonder male suicide rates are so high.

reply

[–] 123Guy (7635) 20 days ago

did they film all the guns held to the guys heads?

or was it their choice?

reply

[–] StinkyPoopyPants (3142) 20 days ago

Ugh. What a disgusting waste of oxygen.

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39073) 18 days ago

How many fluffers did they have?

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (2682) 17 days ago

Looking for a side hustle, Andy?

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39073) 17 days ago

It’s a dying art.

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (2682) 17 days ago

You may be right with the transition to OnlyFans.

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39073) 17 days ago

I was thinking more of chemically enhanced solutions.

reply

[–] horrorfan000 (2332) 3 days ago

If this had been a documentary about a man sleeping with a hundred women in one day that same me too movement would be screaming into their keyboards. Just so im clear on the rules it's offensive for men to exploit and sexualize women for the sake of entertainment but it's super accepted by me too for women to do it to themselves.

reply