Pedro and the prenup

So why are prenups acceptable when a woman (or her family) wants it, but not when a man wants it?
I remember the $hitstorm over prenup when that older guy wanted it for his younger Filipina wife (Mike and Nikki perhaps?)

Since his English is so poor? I doubt his signature would mean anything. There's no way in hell he should sign any document in a language he barely speaks without legal counsel.

Regardless of gender, if you're not with someone just for their money, why would you be SO ANGRY over it? Cause even if you sign a prenup, usually there is a stipulation that you may get some money still of things go awry. It's not always an all-or-nothing thing. His mother seems like another trashy bi*** from another country that thinks Americans owe her and her family a damn thing. Disgusting tantrum she had.

I don't get the whole prenup thing at all. She appears to be a typical young single female with just average resources. What does she have that needs to be protected by a prenup? Feels like something introduced by producers to stir up drama. Their storyline is pretty boring.

I got married and have a prenuptual agreement. My wife has a lot of assets and there's a lot of family wealth where she has shares in a number of family assets.

There's a few pros that I think people overlook.

1. If one spouse has more debt than the other, it can protect the debt-free spouse.

2. Most people getting married probably don't actually figure out their assets before hand, a prenup forces couples to do it. At the very least, couples should do this with or without a prenup.

3. Prepare for the worst and hope for the best... With the 50% divorce rate it is foolish to leave anyone's assets up for grabs in divorce court.



I've never been able to find any statistics that show that a marriage with a prenuptual agreement is less likely to succeed than a marriage without one, though in my internet searches before getting married, I looked at the pros and cons. The cons are generally pretty weak (compared to the pros), and usually are emotionally driven more than anything else.


As with any legal document, someone who doesn't get independent council to review the document is asking for trouble. I often hear people who are upset over their prenuptual agreement eventually say they signed it without knowing really what was in it. Really? Also, anyone who comes at the 11th hour with one of them isn't serious about your best interests either.

No, not the mind probe!

First off, IMO, their story is kinda boring, and dumb. Why wait till last minute for EVERYTHING.

So the lawyer couldn't do the prenup in enough time, but they were able to do one online? Is the online one legally binding, or whatever?

And last, I get that there's a portion of this show that's scripted, and a portion that's real. What I don't know is the percentage of true/fake. Their story seems to be 90ish percent fake. That whole wedding scene when the parents show up at the last minute, then her brother at the last second. It looked like something that's overdone in a lot of cheesy movies.

If her family's feelings about Pedro are true, then they owe him an apology.

They should add the families to the reunion shows, so they can see for themselves. Like Nicole's family talking trash about Azan solely based on what Nicole tells them. And Chantels family sh!tting on Pedro, when they can now see all the lies and deception came from her. They can even see her getting drunk and grinding her ass on all those strange men at the club, in front of her fiancé.