Very British Cast
The majority of the cast is British, but I don't see anything to indicate it is a joint production with anyone in the UK.
shareThe majority of the cast is British, but I don't see anything to indicate it is a joint production with anyone in the UK.
shareJodie Whittaker's accent is good although some of it is a touch too flat and it slips a bit when she's getting emotional. The guy playing Aldrich Ames isn't as good though.
Unless Alpert's covered in bacon grease, I don't think Hugo can track anything.
Paul Rhys' accent slipped early on--very distracting.
shareIt's probably filmed in the UK completely hence the very British cast.
shareI noticed it particularly in the scene where they were discussing how best to pay off their asset.
Unless Alpert's covered in bacon grease, I don't think Hugo can track anything.
Shhhh. The British aren't as good at American accents as they like to believe.
:-)
Shoes are like crack to women - Sophocles
Yes, I immediately twigged that every actor I was seeing right off the bat was British. Rhys as Aldrich was the first one. Poor Rhys...he's always stuck playing the creeps.
It was a bit odd on an ABC show, given it had that feel and look of a British drama one often sees--the lighting, simple, gritty natural looks to the sets, etc. Not the unrealistic flash and botox and shambling skeletons required of strictly US productions.
Then saw it was filmed entirely in Vilnius and the light bulb went on. Costs?
Verisimilitude of an '80s setting? Also, British actors are closer by and, well, let's face it, cheaper than U.S. ones. Also they have the range to play period as well as U.S. accents.
So financially and setting-wise filming in Vilnius seemed right to capture the look they are after, especially of outdoor Soviet '80s.
And with the success of "The Americans," guess they thought there might be an appetite among viewers for Cold War drama, and one of the three networks, ABC, perhaps wanted to capitalize on that.
But I suspect that hope is not going to pan out. Am very glad they gave it a chance, but it's not going to fly on mainstream stations that produce crap all the time and draw their viewers who are drawn lowest quality programming around.
Just don't see the majority of ABC viewers as types who would want to watch something you might see normally on Channel4 or ITV in the UK.
It's a mismatch of audience and network.
I admire them for trying it; but cannot imagine it will be successful. It's too sophisticated and historic in nature--not enough sex and car chases.
That will never fly on one of the Three Drecks (ABC, NBC, CBS).
you forgot to add " but are not as bad as americans trying an english accent"
shareThe matter of accents could stem from a career issue. How important is it for an American to have a British accent for a project (in terms of affecting future career choices) than is it for a Brit to have an American voice? Or for that matter any non-American?
Many non-Americans try their hand at obtaining work in the US and many do it by using American or American-sounding accents. Some have pulled it off successfully, and some develop a mid-Atlantic accent that makes do, for example Patrick McGoohan, born in the US, raised in Ireland but developed a neutral accent for film and TV work when called upon to be 'American'.
On the other side of the coin, not too many North American actors/actresses expect to make as big a career move when doing work in the UK, so the matter of gaining a UK accent doesn't weigh as much. Some might do it fairly well but maintaining it convincingly would be something else, e.g. Gwyneth Paltrow.
As for perspective, I was born in the UK, raised in the Caribbean and live in North America. I can distinguish accents from both sides of the Atlantic and can reproduce them at will. The Brits in Assets do a fairly credible job and while many will nitpick over this detail, I tend to look at the acting first and these people can act.
I noticed that, too. I was going... "Hey, I think I know that guy from 'Foyle's War'", and "Wasn't she in 'Broadchurch?'". It was when I noticed that it was the exceedingly lovely Christina Cole underneath that red ponytail and that the Russian interrogator is someone I've seen in multiple English crime movies that I realized that maybe this wasn't a US production. I mean, its one thing when they cast the odd RADA actor to class up the production, its quite another when even the bit players are straight from UK central casting. They did a fine job making it look like a US series.
Oh hey, I just realized the agent who got pinched at the park is the same dude who played the waiter on "Mr. Selfridge". hehe
Gonna watch for breaks in their accents now. ^^
D.
The Soviet interrogator was Nicholas Woodeson. I always think of him as Julius Caesar's devoted slave Posca from the tv series Rome.
Unless Alpert's covered in bacon grease, I don't think Hugo can track anything.
Oh hey, thats right! Good catch!
sharei always remember him playing a paedo in inspector frost
shareI think a lot more people might recognize Julian Ovenden now that he's in this most recent series of Downton Abbey.
shareThis series was filmed in Lithuania.
Regarding the extensive casting of British actors, my guess is that had a lot to do with ABC Entertainment President Paul Lee, who himself is British and who was formerly with the BBC and then BBC America before joining ABC. He may have been able to get some fine British talent to sign on to this mini-series for very little money in exchange for exposure into a broader American market (i.e. those who do not watch regularly watch Masterpiece Theatre or BBC America).
Paul Lee has stated that one of his plans for ABC programming is to break up some of the serialized dramas into two 12-week uninterrupted runs and to fill the gap time with a limited series. The Assets is one of the early tests of this fill-in programming concept. Unfortunately, it does not seem to be funded at the same level as other productions - at least to my eye.
[deleted]
I hope they broadcast the entire series. It's an interesting bit of history even though I'm still undecided about the quality of the production.
shareNot sure the nationality makes a difference - we have drama here in the UK with American actors. Either way, good actors are good actors; country of origin shouldn't matter.
Oh and to those mentioning the accents - when the Americans can sound British and NOT Australian when portraying my countrymen, they can criticise us Brits doing American accents; until then they can just button it.
-----------------
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried..- Anonymous
<we have drama here in the UK with American actors>
Sorry, nowhere near the amount of drama we have in the US with British actors. I've always held that Americans are far more open to having Brits play Americans than the Brits are to having Americans play Brits. We simply don't have an issue with foreigners portraying us. This is something Brits, Canadians, Australians can learn from us.
<<Oh and to those mentioning the accents - when the Americans can sound British and NOT Australian when portraying my countrymen, they can criticise us Brits doing American accents; until then they can just button it. >>
Oh dear, touched a nerve did we? :-)
Shoes are like crack to women - Sophocles
Sorry, nowhere near the amount of drama we have in the US with British actors. I've always held that Americans are far more open to having Brits play Americans than the Brits are to having Americans play Brits. We simply don't have an issue with foreigners portraying us. This is something Brits, Canadians, Australians can learn from us.
Oh dear, touched a nerve did we? :-)
<I don't have a problem with anyone playing a brit so long as they can actually do the accent convincingly. Americans can't.....never.
Double negative there. I believe the correct word is EVER. As in "Americans can't . . . EVER." Aren't you the people who invented the language????
And the last part of your message was merely a tantrum. Where did I ever mention empire?
Shoes are like crack to women - Sophocles
Double negative there. I believe the correct word is EVER. As in "Americans can't . . . EVER." Aren't you the people who invented the language????
And the last part of your message was merely a tantrum. Where did I ever mention empire?
<However, I've had two strokes ->
Yes, and I'm a supermodel.
Sorry, but after spending years reading BS on IMDb, I don't believe a bleedin' word anyone writes on these boards.
Shoes are like crack to women - Sophocles
I REALLY hate being called a liar. Check with North Staffordshire University hospital - PM me and I'll give you my hospital number to ask about....
DON'T tar others witht thenm same brush you use on yourself. iF YOUur';e a liar it doesn'tr mean I am too.
horrible...not bother typing more; get upset and cant. You not worth it.
I'm so sorry to hear that ttandb :-/
I really hope you recover quickly and retain good health.
For the record just ignore the morons who being so quick to point out other people's minor failings fail to realise their own colossal ones.
Thank you, journalist1, you're lovely.
Actually, I'm as good as I'm going to get, but I look at it like this - I'm not dead, so anything else is always going to be bonus.
I shouldn't have got so angry; it's ridiculous, but I never lie (I can't remember them!) so to be called a liar is very upsetting; but then I am a bit touchy since the strokes, so it's as much my fault I'm sure.
But thank you, you're very nice and helped me put it all in perspective.
----
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried..- Anonymous
[deleted]
Contrary to the popular belief of many Americans, you're country is not the boss of the world. I see the American empire beginning to topple as so many others have before it; not least the Roman and British ones. The problem with empires is they eventually can't maintain their borders - though in the US case I would argue their financial empire will fall first, if it hasn't already.....
Wow, a bit anti yank showing mate :) I suppose you also subscribe to the younger British generations view that you did not need any help from us in WW2? That one makes me LOL. Oh and now that I think about it.. how about you start paying us back, as the deal was "Lend Lease". You can have the upgraded gene pool we gave you for free for those sweet Rolls Royce Merlin's you put in the first batch of P-51 Mustangs we lent you. Thanks for that since it made the Mustang the best fighter of the war! []
Oh and great job selling your Jet engine to the Russians, that really helped them kill lots of yanks with the Mig 15..Till we got the F-86 in country.
[deleted]
Re: Very British Cast
image for user ttandb
by
ttandb
» Fri Jan 10 2014 04:07:20 Flag ▼
| Reply |
IMDb member since September 2005
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow, a bit anti yank showing mate :) I suppose you also subscribe to the younger British generations view that you did not need any help from us in WW2? That one makes me LOL. Oh and now that I think about it.. how about you start paying us back, as the deal was "Lend Lease". You can have the upgraded gene pool we gave you for free for those sweet Rolls Royce Merlin's you put in the first batch of P-51 Mustangs we lent you. Thanks for that since it made the Mustang the best fighter of the war! []
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not anti-yank at all actually; I like the Americans and have friends in New York, who I've known for nearly 25 years. However, I don't subscribe to the American belief that if it's American or an American says it, it's golden.
America is an empire or, if it makes you feel more comfortable, a super power and as such feels it can act and do as it pleases as all empires do. The people also act the same way as shown in your response and that of your compatriots here. However, I do not believe ALL Americans are like that thank goodness.
As to your point - no, actually I study history and am well aware how badly things were going; so I'm very thankful for America's intervention in the war. However, it should be noted that America only got involved after Pearl Harbour was bombed and only in the war in Europe after Hitler declared war on America, so it's hardly a the altruistic (sp?) act you're implying.
Oh and with regard to the 'lend/lease' agreement - only a tiny fraction of the tanks and boats that were promised were sent, and they were all old knackered ones that Roosevelt didn't want. He admitted he didn't dare send more for fear of angering the American people. The P51's, I'm sorry to inform you, were not a patch in the British Spitfire.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and great job selling your Jet engine to the Russians, that really helped them kill lots of yanks with the Mig 15..Till we got the F-86 in country.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Listen, we cannot help our traitorous leaders when they pull a stunt that hurts our allies. You can't seriously believe your country has never made such a blunder? what about the Iran-Contra debacle? Oliver North was involved in an arms deal, during the regan admin, that sold arms to IRAN.....So again you're country is hardly blameless.
As it is no one's blameless in such issues - we all have leaderships that turn traitor and lie. Look at the Iraq and Afghanistan nightmare - we were all told by our leaders they had WMDs that could strike at our countries in 20-45 minutes; they didn't and Bush and Blair lied through their teeth. The sad thing is our brave service personnel paid with their lives. That's terrible; but hey if you want to keep believing that America is utterly blameless and brilliant, then go right ahead.
As for your tagline; as object burma was a movie about the Pacific war you could say mission accomplished - you really did nearly wipe them from the face of the earth; mind you, dropping two atomic bombs would do that.
-----
Angry people need hugs (and to be kept away from all sharp objects).- Anonymous
[deleted]
I sense an undercurrent of something nasty here, maybe it's to do with the fact that the Brits have dominated American tv for a while now, perhaps it's jealously due to the fact they consistently out-act their US cousins.
Or perhaps it's due to Americans getting a bit tired of pasty faced Brits putting on truly awful American accents and prancing around our TV screens? Sorry, but most Brits couldn't act their way out of a brown paper bag.
Shoes are like crack to women - Sophocles
I have to agree. As much as I love me some Julian Ovenden, he has one of the most atrocious American accents I have ever heard. Don't get me wrong, he is a really good actor, and speaks really amazing French, but if he had a gun to his head and had to fool an American, he'd be dead. It's that bad. I like the show, but this is the second movie/ show he's been in (in particular) where he's been forced (?) to be American, and it just doesn't suit him. I just can't believe they couldn't find at least a dialogue coach. Or something.
share