MovieChat Forums > Inferno (2016) Discussion > Terrible Camera Work and Editing

Terrible Camera Work and Editing


I gave up halfway through the film because of the choppy editing and crazy camera work. It's as if the filmmakers thought treating the film in this way would build up action and create tension but it just makes the film seem all over the place and renders the story incoherent.

reply

I couldn't agree more.

reply

I agree 100%. I hate this kind of sloppy camera work and editing. I hope this stupid trend ends soon.

reply

I did not see Inferno (I considered doing so), but this sort of style plagues too many films nowadays. Especially early on, before he might settle down about halfway through, many a director seems intent on "creating" intensity through deliberately shaky camera work, constant (and needless) camera movements, and rapid-fire editing—despite the narrative usually not justifying such techniques. A couple of other recent examples are Ben-Hur (the 2016 remake) and the current Patriots Day. Both films are decent; without the cinematic "forcing" that especially occurs early on, they could have been better. For instance, one would expect such techniques for scenes involving the Boston Marathon bombing and the immediate aftermath in Patriots Day; instead, director Peter Berg uses them from the very start of the film and pretty much all through the first half. Indeed, the camera swerves around so much that you would think that the camera operator was drunk.

Even All Is Lost and Captain Phillips, very good films from late 2013, suffer from too much shaky camera work or gratuitous camera movements early on. Without that flaw, All Is Lost may have constituted a great movie. I thought that director Terrence Malik's The Tree of Life (2011) was another very good film, but he floated the camera around so much early on that I almost felt dizzy. Obviously, the choice proved intentional, and perhaps it was justifiable, but it also might have been overdone.

reply

I don't mind this style so much when it's purposely done to stylize the film or television show. The newer Battlestar Galactic series is an example of it being done well, at least in my opinion. But so many movies don't stylize the crazy camera work, making it come across as sloppy and amateurish. Inferno is one of them.

reply

Agreed. Poorly directed by an experienced director, and poorly edited. Shame, could have been so much better.

reply

I gave up after 10 minutes, it was headache inducing.

reply

Don't blame the director, the source material was godawful and he had to do what he could to disguise the nonsensical events!

And this from someone who actually liked some if Dan Brown's books.

reply

Agreed, "The Davinci Code" was technically very well directed and edited. I don't understand why "Inferno" is like this. What happened to Ron Howard?

reply