Please don't tell me


that this a remake of the original! It seems to me that Hollywood has run out of ideas (Gasp!)!


-----"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody's on my side, little Orc."-----
-Treebeard: The Two Towers

reply

Yes it is unfortunately.

reply

reply

And the original was a remake of An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge.

reply

and a few Twilight Zone episodes, too. "Owl Creek Bridge" was shown on TWZ, too, btw.



. . . there's always room for Jello!

reply

yes and no. The original story, i read in an interview with Rubin was not a dream.

It was end times happening in a real, biblical way. HORROR. Jacob (and every one else) was watching a scourge of horror unleashed across the land-which also had a kind of Bhuddist philosophy going on in the background

The story was revised at the insistence of Lynne, and for now, all you can get is the screenplay in print, which has the 'Owl Creek' story line.

Yet the film tries to have it both ways

Was this all a feverish dream Jacob was having in the last minutes of his life?

If so, how could he even have known about the BZ subplot?-Government testing, the Chemist-all of which the dream makes rather irrelevant. That makes it seem real world.

reply

For awhile, I thought that "The Chemist" was Jacob's alter ego and his conscious in the form of a ghost. I was under the impression that Jacob had created the BZ gas and was unknowingly present when it was tested on his platoon at the beginning of the film.

I finally got a glimpse of Jacob's college degree and it wasn't in chemical engineering. It's a liberal arts degree. So I abandoned that theory.

The BZ subplot really had no place in the movie other than to make some unfounded conspiratorial comment about the Vietnam War.

reply

[deleted]

The problem I had was that Jacob didn't seem to be effected by the drug.

So how was the drug administered? Through the food to select soldiers? If it was airborne, Jacob should have been effected by it, unless he was inoculated.

reply

Wasn't it in the weed they were smoking?

reply