This is purely subjective on my part, but it's something I noticed.
Did anybody else feel that Claire was always her most naturally beautiful when she was in the 18th Century?
Personally, I never felt her 20th Century look was that attractive. But she just seemed to glow in the earlier time frame.
I was thinking the same thing. Her 1945 look doesn't do it for me at all.
shareMost women look better with long hair, free flowing or in braids, wearing dresses. Short hair and trousers doesn't help most women. Add the current trend of tattoos and weird piercings and some women look quite a fright.
share
Add the current trend of tattoos and weird piercings and some women look quite a fright.
the current trend of tattoos and weird piercings and some women look quite a fright.
She is a very naturally beautiful woman, not needing much makeup to look good. I loved it when she and Jamie went to Paris, and she got to wear all those pretty dresses. It was fun seeing what she could have made by the dressmakers in one of the most fashionable cities of the 18th century.
And yes, I liked her better when she wore her hair long and curly, instead of tied up or in that ridiculous 60s hairdo.