"Unnecessary boob shots"

You set a horror movie in a sorority house. That's a MUCH more stereotypical setting for a horror movie than, say, an old-age home or a fat farm, and there's probably a REASON for that. The actresses you cast all range from pretty hot to really hot. The establishing scenes show them in their underwear or wrapped in towels and flashing each other with their back to the camera (and what real reason do girls have to flash each other anyway?), or some of the girls sneaking into the bathroom with a video camera while another girl is in the bath. This is all in the first 30 minutes. Gee, why would anybody expect any female nudity. It's not like when you make a movie where everyone is waving guns around, you expect a gun battle. It's not like when one person is following another person and they're both driving souped-up cars, you expect a car chase.

Then at one point a character makes the comment about an "unnecessary boob shot" (which isn't really a boob shot since she's really only admiring her no doubt surgically enhanced cleavage in a mirror). This is obviously a thump on the nose of all the male "pervs" expecting female nudity in this movie. And, to be fair, there later is an "unnecessary boob shot" except it is totally "necessary", if not believable, because the protagonists are trying to determine if their victim has fake breasts by cutting them off.

This is what is so ANNOYING about modern horror movies. Of course, they can NOT have sex or female nudity. But whether they do or not, why promise way more than you're going to deliver? Why have constant set-ups for female nudity with no pay off? Why have an entire cast of hot sorority girls with surgically enhanced breasts, most of whom aren't great actresses, if you're NOT going to show much T and A. This is a totally unnecessary movie made by a bunch of boobs, so forgive me for expecting more "unnecessary boob shots".