MovieChat Forums > A Most Violent Year (2015) Discussion > Very weird reaction to STELLAR movie.

Very weird reaction to STELLAR movie.


SUCH a great movie but very subtle in its delivery. It seems like people are way too used to having everything that happens spelled out for them. "He didn't SAY he was making an illegal choice, so he wasn't!" etc.

The amount of people that don't understand AT ALL what happened in this movie is mind-blowing -
(i.e. thinking the secret bank account was a "convenient plot twist", thinking that the D.A. "sucked up to" Abel in the last scene, or better yet that the D.A.'s character didn't develop at all and he was just simply congratulating Abel on his purchase, that Abel&Anna didn't have a certain chemistry just because the actors didn't, etc. etc.) makes me sad.

What a great movie, and how misunderstood. It must have such a low rating because people really don't get what it was about or what happened, and they didn't get it because it was subtle instead of being super obvious about everything. "A Most Violent Year" has people communicating with a nod or a thinly coded sentence, where most movies just say exactly what we're supposed to be seeing. This is truly a film that was made with the golden rule of cinema in mind, "Show, Don't Tell", and truly suffered a loss in its popularity for that reason.

And it's sad that to most people on here, an attempted armed robbery, a little girl playing with + pointing a loaded gun at her own face, a guy being beat up so bad he ends up in the hospital, several truck-jackings, gun chases, another guy being beat up and dumped out of a truck, people chasing each other through the subway / in public concealing guns, a constant feeling of being unsafe in one's home and at work AND A GUY BLOWING HIS OWN %$#@ING HEAD OFF WITH A GUN aren't enough violence to constitute having the title "A Most Violent Year".


"It should have had a lot more violence"? This isn't Kill Bill. The violence is implied in the tone, and there is enough actual violence throughout the movie to get the point across. This is a different kind of movie and I'm just sorry that it's not appreciated for what it is just because it's not something gorier/more obvious.

We truly are desensitized creatures - to subtlety in art as well as violence in film.

reply

+1

reply

OP,

very nice post, and on the money.

reply

Beautifully said! And yes, it is a a very layered film that requires some thinking to really grasp what is going on. I admit I didn't even get everything the first time around, as my mind was prepared for something different; or "the usual action-thriller formula garbage". Upon second viewing, the greatness of this movie really hit home. "A Most Violent Year" is an elegant and classy film, something that we see less of with each passing year.

"IMdB; where 14 year olds can act like jaded 40 year old critics...'

reply

I agree.

reply

I think most of the dissatisfied viewers expected a more straightforward gangster movie, like Godfather or Scarface. A Most Violent Year was more of a drama and so they felt like "nothing interesting is happening".

reply