Why I loved Dazed (10/10) and not this (6-7/10) - spoilers.
Please don't mind my shorthand remarks, I'll be happy to try and elaborate upon request...
1 - EWS is not as powerfully evocative as Dazed. For one thing, I can't even tell whether it's trying to recapture or reimagine the times (what do you think?). Either way, the timeframe remains what seems to me like a fetishistic obsession throughout that Linklater et al revel in rather than involve us in. I was never quite there.
2 - EWS lacks the journey motif that made Dazed so compulsive. It feels scattered with no sense of progression for the most part. If that's 'the whole point' as I keep hearing, then why wans't it like that - at all - in Dazed?
3 - EWS is not a maturation plot. Jake blends so seamlessly in the background that by the point he gets the girl (and the film does at least strive to make something out of that), it's a complete afterthought.
4 - EWS lacks the cinematic magic of Dazed. This one is harder to pin down but I think it relates back to what I said about why it feels less vivid. The Emporium entrace takes me places, as does that 'best years of my life' slow-mo on Pink at the end. Where exactly does EWS transcend itself, if you know what I mean?
That should suffice for now, but there's more in my mind, like how Dazed trusts itself to tackle a whole load of ideas whereas EWS seems intent on reducing it to a few expository lines cutting right through the subtext.
Some good characters, as you would expect, but that's another no-contest...
Anyway, your take? Help me embrace this film.
I was hoping things would work out for her. She was a good friend of mine.