The writers wasted precious screen time with an unconvincing romance between Juliette and Noah.
Juliette's story is sad no doubt, but, I feel the writers could have put more meat into the finale by putting the original characters like Cole, Allison, Helen and even Luisa. Luisa actually has a purpose, she's married to Cole, what was the purpose of Julliette?
Aha! Julliette's storyline is to act like a compass for Noah. She basically pointed Noah into another direction.
I know all of this yet her heavy screen time annoyed me! I just didn't care!
I like that Whitney and Noah mended some things and a little trust and security was regained but Julliette did not need to star in the finale.
She should have definitely been used more in earlier episodes of the season but the finale felt like they crammed as much as possible with her storyline then got rid of her.
1. I liked Juiliette's story and her character. She was one of the more mature, believable characters in the series. I liked the connection between how she dealt with her husband's lingering illness and how Noah dealt with his mother's lingering illness. And I also liked how she dealt with her daughter's rudeness compared to how Noah and Helen dealt with their children's rudeness.
2. I didn't like the false mending of the fences between Noah and his children. It felt contrived given their past interactions.
3. I thought the whole focus on Juliette and Noah in France, a few months removed from his total meltdown felt absurd and bizarre. As such, this season "finale" was one of the worst I'd ever seen. Clearly, Sarah Treem has no idea what she's doing, and it shows. I guarantee that this show will lose a significant portion of its viewing audience.
"Lettin' the cat outta the bag is a whole lot easier 'n puttin' it back in." -- Will Rogers
I also liked how she dealt with her daughter's rudeness compared to how Noah and Helen dealt with their children's rudeness.
I forgot that scene. I loved how she put her daughter in place.
I didn't like the false mending of the fences between Noah and his children. It felt contrived given their past interactions.
I like that it was actually mended but you are right, it was cheaply done.
I thought the whole focus on Juliette and Noah in France, a few months removed from his total meltdown felt absurd and bizarre.
Absurd!!! I couldn't agree more. From Juliette's POV, Noah seemed so in love as though he had a fresh awakening.... Come on???? The man refused Juliette's advances earlier on, he was mentally unstable, addicted to opiates and physically weak and now a mere few months and he's back to his old self in a new relationship?
reply share
Yeah. I don't have anything against Noah repairing his relationships with his children. That's certainly a good thing; just not the way it was handled.
"Lettin' the cat outta the bag is a whole lot easier 'n puttin' it back in." -- Will Rogers
I thought there was more to that scene that just Juliette yelling at her daughter. Sabine didn't feel like Juliette had a place at Etienne's death bed because she hadn't been there for him. Sabine had watched her mother go overseas when her father was his sickest, and then had to suffer the humiliation of her mother's affair. She was speaking from her heart and she had a point. It got under Juliette's skin and she lost her cool and raised her voice. Later she said as much to Noah -- that she had abandoned Etienne (he was the one locked in the tower).
Good parenting isn't putting your kid in his/her place. Dominance doesn't really resolve much unless your kid is little and unable to differentiate danger from safety. Good parenting is trying to understand where your kid is coming from and admitting your mistakes. Later, Noah finally does this during his scene with his obnoxious daughter when they walk along the Seine. He realizes that a lot of her troubling behavior was the direct result of his own mistakes -- ie he didn't keep her safe from "guys like him", as he's the one modeling how men should be, and she picked an abusive, douchey artist just like him.
Sabine had watched her mother go overseas when her father was his sickest, and then had to suffer the humiliation of her mother's affair. She was speaking from her heart and she had a point. It got under Juliette's skin and she lost her cool and raised her voice.
I thought Sabine was being crass and rude when she was mouthing off her mother. The show has always made it seem that Juliette was the most devoted wife to Etienne amidst his unrestrained lifestyle and heavy cheating (making Noah to look like an amateur). Juliette remained with him yet she spent most of her time with Sabine. She only spent time with Etienne when he made himself available to her.
Juliette continued to care for Etienne up until she was offered the research opportunity which I'm sure she fell between a rock and a hard place. Either to continue staying with her husband whom she loved or finally being recognized for her work and not for something in Etienne's shadow. She took a chance and left hoping to "live" and have an adventure like Etienne. She enjoyed her job, her students, her apartment, her red car... her freedom. Yet, it all came with a price because deep down she felt guilty.
The scene between Juliette and the Head of Dept, we learn that Etienne was ill for 3 years but declined rapidly over the last few months (coinciding with her time in America). Even the nurse and the women on the streets empathised with Juliette for being so young yet bearing the yolk of diligently caring for her much older, sick husband.
In my opinion, Sabine was being very ungrateful towards her mother! She didn't even consider or comprehend the sacrifices Juliette made living with Etienne (keep in mind Sabine was at college going along with her new life). The only thing Sabine saw was Juliette's unrestrained freedom contrasting with a restrained (sick and helpless) innocent Etienne. Sabine adored her father, so, she wouldn't even entertain his "Hemmingway" lifestyle.
Juliette was punished for one adventure. Etienne had a lifetime of adventures and was never held accountable.
Thank you. Her mouthy daughter had no idea what her mother had gone through, and had no right whatsoever to behave the way she did. Her mother did the right thing by quickly putting her in her place, UNLIKE the rest of these dysfunctional misfit parents that have proliferated throughout this series. It was truly a breath of fresh air.
"Lettin' the cat outta the bag is a whole lot easier 'n puttin' it back in." -- Will Rogers
Let me explain, again. Kids learn more by what their parents do than by what they say. So if you're someone who models antisocial behavior - yelling, slapping, putting down, dominating -- they're going to learn that these things are appropriate expressions of their own feelings. Then they're going to exhibit those behaviors, and be that mouthy teenager that everyone hates. Telling your kid off doesn't teach them anything except that you are unable to handle a situation without being mouthy yourself.
The best parents are consistent, patient, and even keeled.
ie he didn't keep her safe from "guys like him", as he's the one modeling how men should be, and she picked an abusive, douchey artist just like him.
Noah may be douchy to have had the affair but he is in no way abusive, physically or mentally. It was his guilt talking when he compared himself to Furkat, he is far from being like him, for all his faults.
I thought he has always tried to be good to his kids and see them as human beings - up until the affair when he did abandon them - and I can't really understand their problems. It has to be their being spoiled by the in-laws and their mother.
It's true that Noah is an artist as well, although not a very successful one materially or critically.
reply share
^^^This. And yes, Noah being an "artist" by some measure made his interaction with Furkat an opportunity for some reflection. Noah finally saw how he was when his book was reaching peak fame, he was some 3.5-4 yrs ago as self-adulatory Furkat was being now--harken back to Noah's grind-a-thon with his publicist. And yes, Noah was never physically violent with any of the women in his life.
You're right, he didn't physically abuse them. But think about what he said when he was on his book tour about how he wanted to go to Europe and screw women because he thought he deserved it. The Furkat character was a total embodiment of Noah all the way down to his art -- Noah's book is very sex-based, and Furkat's photos are just close up and after close up of vag. Clearly, they are supposed to reference each other.
If you can't understand what Solloway childrens' problems are, think about what Whitney said -- that by cheating and abandoning Helen, Noah might as well have hit her. Whitney felt she had to suffer the consequences by watching Helen suffer, but that Noah had escaped any kind of responsibility. It was a form of emotional abuse - maybe not verbal, but by actions.
Noah always blamed the kids' problems on the grandparents and they sure share some of the blame. They are terrible role models. But he never really got it until the last episode the profound affect his actions had.
But think about what he said when he was on his book tour about how he wanted to go to Europe and screw women because he thought he deserved it.
Actually he said this to the marriage counselor, but it is how he behaved on his book tour. He thought doing whatever he wanted, whenever he wanted to, was a characteristic of a "great man."
The Furkat character was a total embodiment of Noah all the way down to his art -- Noah's book is very sex-based, and Furkat's photos are just close up and after close up of vag. Clearly, they are supposed to reference each other.
Excellent point, which I hadn't thought of.
If you can't understand what Solloway childrens' problems are, think about what Whitney said -- that by cheating and abandoning Helen, Noah might as well have hit her. Whitney felt she had to suffer the consequences by watching Helen suffer, but that Noah had escaped any kind of responsibility. It was a form of emotional abuse - maybe not verbal, but by actions.
I too have trouble understanding the Solloway children's problems, pre-affair. Whitney's dialogue was good, in that, as is typical of her, her primary thoughts were about herself, and how things impact her. All of the Solloway kids suffered from watching Helen suffer, and merely due to their parents separating and divorcing; they were no longer a family, which was Noah's choice, not Helen's.
I disagree with Whitney's melodramatic "You may as well have hit me." Physical abuse is an escalation -- a line that Noah didn't cross, and a significant line. Emotional abuse, in the form of abandonment, yes, he did do that.
Noah always blamed the kids' problems on the grandparents and they sure share some of the blame. They are terrible role models. But he never really got it until the last episode the profound affect his actions had.
IMO, Helen's parents were the primary cause of the kids' problems, at least as we've been shown. I saw both Helen and Noah trying to counteract and neutralize Helen's parents' negative influence, as best they could. I never saw what I'd consider actual bad parenting on the part of either Helen or Noah, except for Noah's being so captivated by Alison and his affair, he put them second. This is why I don't understand why Martin acted out by faking his suicide in the pilot, or why Whitney was such an obnoxious b!tch.
reply share
This is why I don't understand why Martin acted out by faking his suicide in the pilot, or why Whitney was such an obnoxious b!tch.
I strongly defend putting your child in his or her place. That rudeness, cursing mum and dad, obnoxious and bratty behaviour will not fly!!!
The children raised my blood pressure in the pilot episode! Here we have your average nuclear family. Mum, dad and children. The family is getting ready to go on a vacation. You see Noah struggling to pack the vehicle while none of the children even attempt to help, then comes Martin, who mischievously pulls one luggage out causing most of the the bags to fall, he smirks and says "Oops you forgot one" to Noah who like an idiot did not correct his son's behaviour but exclaims "Ahhh come on buddy I just packed that?" Noah then like a fool goes and PICKS UP all the bags and repacks the car while Martin laughed his way back into the house!!!
We see Helen flustered, trying to organize everyone and comes Whitney cursing because she wants her own way. Helen does not correct her daughter.
I understand to an extent the children's rude behavior post affair but I don't understand their behaviour pre affair. They are privileged children. Their parents are still together, they have a house to live in, food, clothes, their own rooms, a vacation house, cell phones etc...
Helen and Noah NEVER disciplined their children and as parents they didn't demand respect.
I was left puzzled by the children's behaviour and began to search for clues... The reasons are -:
1. The children see their father being emasculated by Helen's parents. Over and over again. Noah doesn't defend himself and Helen doesn't defend her husband (except once I believe).
2. The parents DO NOT put their feet down and firmly STOP Bruce and Margaret when they start their brainwashing only when a situation escalated.
3. They give their children too much upper hand. The children curse their parents for not respecting their privacy.
4. Martin was given a pat on the shoulder for his fake suicide attempt.
5. The parents missed a play or a sports game or don't have a lot of time for them (work). (Not a valid reason for that crass behavior).
Martin was not disrespectful to Cole because he gave him boundaries and commanded respect.
Exactly. Thank you for listing specific events and providing context. Their childrens' dysfunctional behavior is the direct result of poor parenting by Noah and Helen and even worse grandparenting by Margaret and Bruce. (I know it's a poor analogy but just watch The Dog Whisperer a couple of times and see how much consistent discipline (or lack thereof) impacts behavior. It looks miraculous when Caesar gets the results he does but it's not; it's a matter of firm, consistent discipline; the very thing totally lacking in Helen and Noah.)
"Lettin' the cat outta the bag is a whole lot easier 'n puttin' it back in." -- Will Rogers
it's a matter of firm, consistent discipline; the very thing totally lacking in Helen and Noah.
I agree 100%!!!!!
Modern parenting focuses too much on always reasoning with your child, giving them their space and privacy when they want it, not raising your voice... If you don't give them your attention at their beck and call expect a temper tantrum.
I'm not saying abuse your children, but good grief, your children should not be cursing you! Did we even see Noah and Helen curse each other in front of the kids? Was cursing and abrupt disrespect part of Noah and Helen's everyday communication? I don't remember that... So, the kids did not see their parents act this way, as such, shouldn't their behaviour be better?
It falls under the "tough love" category. So many of us are spoiled that we don't have a clue what tough love is all about. And when it comes to the Solloways, they are a cry for help for tough love -- all of them.
"Lettin' the cat outta the bag is a whole lot easier 'n puttin' it back in." -- Will Rogers
It's a television show, teenagers are usually written horribly. I agree the kids' behavior was over the top considering how the parents were presented, but it's also a POV element where clearly the interpretation of behavior differs from character to character. Noah thinks he's awesome,but we know he isn't!
The reason you shouldn't yell at your children, dominate them, slap them, etc., is because you initiate a stress response. It's called "fight or flight", and the body secretes cortisol which signals glucose and lipids to the bloodstream, priming it for action. The problem with this is that an accumulation of these types of events aren't good for you, and are linked to health issues later on in life. Stress is just as bad for you as smoking, or sugar, etc., it's not really something you want to do to your kids. When you yell at your toddler and make him cry, you're not doing his little body any favors. And then the kids pick up these behaviors and imitate them.
You dont seem to understand that there are ways to raise well behaved kids without raising your voice or using old style dominance. Consistent discipline is very important, but it is something you teach both by practice and by modeling how adults should behave - by treating others, including children, decently. It doesn't mean ignoring bad behavior at all. You make sure it is appropriate for their age and what they can understand. The best kids have parents who have it together.
I understand what you're saying, I'm not saying to scream at your children all the time until they are stricken with fear, releasing cortisol and causing stress resulting in heart problems later on. I agree with appropriate discipline as you mentioned but sometimes it must be firm because children are smart enough to know what is right from wrong. If they know the discipline for their wrongdoing is a soft approach then they will go ahead and do as they please knowing that it's nothing to get a "time out" or being grounded for a week. Also, children not only model their parents but their peers, teachers and what they see on TV. You can reasonably discipline your child and he or she may laugh in your face.
I do agree teenagers are horribly written in TV shows, they always write them as stereotypes. I can only think of one TV show where a teenager was actually really well behaved, mature and smart and that's Julie from Desperate Housewives.
I would however, like to see a TV show where the children are disciplined using modern strategies and the outcome is pleasing. It seems Hollywood is out of ideas.
"I'm not saying abuse your children, but good grief, your children should not be cursing you!"
You sound like a highly narcissistic parent. Sure, leave your child to take care of a dying man with Alzheimers and then expect to be treated with respect. No, when you are a selfish twat, you deserve to be called on it. I would *beep* hate to have you as a parent, you old century hag.
You're totally missing the point and clearly have no concept of "firm, consistent discipline". Everything you write is a lame excuse. (The same young adult child of Juilette is in the same TV show just like Noah and Helen's kids.) You also put words into people's mouths that have never been stated just to try to bolster your weak, ill-informed argument.
"Lettin' the cat outta the bag is a whole lot easier 'n puttin' it back in." -- Will Rogers
If you can't understand what Solloway childrens' problems are, think about what Whitney said -- that by cheating and abandoning Helen, Noah might as well have hit her.
The affair hit the kids hard, but they had problems long before that. I think they both take after and were influenced by Helen's parents.
Bad as an affair is, it's not the same as hitting, no matter what Whitney says. Hitting is out in the open and aggressive and an exertion of control over someone, an affair is secretive, passive-aggressive or just passive, a withdrawal from someone. Whitney is just trying to pile on the blame by turning it into a multi-pronged transgression.
But think about what he said when he was on his book tour about how he wanted to go to Europe and screw women because he thought he deserved it. The Furkat character was a total embodiment of Noah all the way down to his art -- Noah's book is very sex-based, and Furkat's photos are just close up and after close up of vag. Clearly, they are supposed to reference each other.
Yeah, Noah was a real douche for a while when he became wildly, briefly successful. The wild parties, the publicist. This isn't unique to artists. There are some similarities between Furkat and Noah, but abuse is not one of them. reply share
3. If the audience can't handle a new direction instead of the same-old Alison/Cole/Helen merry-go-round that's been chewed over to death, then leave. Rewatch season one through three forever...
New direction is fine. Totally new character/out of character that's been firmly established is not. NO ONE changes that much that quickly. It's simply not believable. And Noah remains as unlikeable as ever. All told it's just not a very good show. That's why it's not worth watching; not because it's taken a different direction.
"Lettin' the cat outta the bag is a whole lot easier 'n puttin' it back in." -- Will Rogers
3. If the audience can't handle a new direction instead of the same-old Alison/Cole/Helen merry-go-round that's been chewed over to death, then leave. Rewatch season one through three forever...
It's not that audiences can't handle new direction it's just the way in which it was done.
Juliette was pulled out of nowhere and given a starring role in the finale. This was done amidst loose ends not being tied up.
She was hardly pulled out of nowhere. We knew of her issues with her Alzheimer's-ridden husband; here they were just expanded on and dovetailed with Noah's own guilt as a caregiver to an ailing loved one.
There were no loose ends with the other characters; Helen came clean about her role in Scottie's death, Alison is reconciled with it and Noah, and Cole just gets on with his life with Luisa while occasionally pining for Alison. The end.
I didn't like the direction of this season at all. I felt the introduction of another POV spread it out entirely too much. I always felt the reason this show worked was how the story lines intermingled, yet from different POV. At this point, Allison and Cole are peripheral characters. They add nothing to further the story line, which apparently is now ALL ABOUT NOAH. Why do we care what Allison and Cole are doing? And almost the entire season was this Gunther character terrorizing Noah, only to turn out to be completely fabricated in Noah's head? And to reveal that in the NEXT to last episode. I feel like the writers didn't expect the show to run past two seasons and ran out of premise for how to make another season out of nothing. And the finale of season three REALLY felt like the SERIES finale. It wrapped a lot of story lines up with Juliette's husband dead, Helen and Vic happy, Noah reconciled with his kids...what's left? Too bad, I really liked this show. We will see if they can redeem in Season Four, although I can't imagine an interesting direction to go from where we left off at the end of Season three.
I was rewatching the finale last night, and was starting to think Juliette and Noah might be the same person. Etienne's death's symbolic for the death of Helen from Noah's life.
You see the destruction that she-beast laid? I'm being risk-averse, considering.
I was rewatching the finale last night, and was starting to think Juliette and Noah might be the same person. Etienne's death's symbolic for the death of Helen from Noah's life.
As in same person in the finale alone or same person all along? Very interesting POV.
In the premiere, there was only one POV of Noah, though there was alot of Juliette in that episode. Not only was Etienne being on his deathbed similar to Noah's mom dying on her deathbed, but Etienne is also similar to Helen.
Without Helen, Noah has nothing. Without Etienne, Juliette has nothing. It's almost as if Juliette's the imaginary version of Noah, caused by Alison, and the freedom Alison introduce Noah to. Etienne's death is symbolic of Noah leaving Helen and the past behind for good.
You see the destruction that she-beast laid? I'm being risk-averse, considering.