I preferred TFA over this, although this is better than Rogue One, IMHO. In my view, Abrams should have written this whole trilogy, even if others directed them. Then the plot would have been consistent right the way through.
With regard to your prequels comment, my response is: it depends on what criteria you're rating the movies. If you're talking about visual spectacle, artistry and cinematography, then you'd be hard pressed to do better than this movie. Even Lucas said it was a beautifully made film.
But, if you want to rate on the basis of plot/story, then this is one of the worst SW movies, if not the worst. Even the prequels had a good story with a consistent plot through the trilogy. The problem with the prequels was the execution (acting, dialogue, direction, etc...), not the story. The story of this one is all over the place, contains large amounts of superfluous sub-plots, largely fails to develop the characters and their back-stories, and (worst of all) pretty much ignores the plot threads set up by Abrams in TFA and goes off on it's own tangent instead.
TL;DR: This film is style over substance.
reply
share