Ron Swanson - Captain Ray Holt (Wooden persona, Father of the group) Leslie - Amy (Over enthusiastic, Always competitive) Andy - Jake (Life is like a movie to him, Childish) April - Rosa (Doesn't give a damn, Straight face most of the time) Tom Haverford - Gina (Plain annoying, style conscious) Donna - Boyle (Up to date with fashion, cooking trends et al) Jerry & Kyle - Hitchcock & Scully (Fumbling Old guys who no one respects)
Only Terry Crews seems to be an original (love the guy btw).
I don't know their are similarities but I think they have a lot of core key differences.
Ron Swanson - Captain Ray Holt (Wooden persona, Father of the group)
While sharing that Ron was a down to earth hard core outdoorsman, libertarian and patron of masculinity. Holt's very much a man of the city, who's interests and taste's are quite high class, and political leanings are somewhat authoritarian.
I agree, Amy does share Leslie's over enthusiasm, nerdish traits and competitiveness. But while Leslie was often overly confident and outgoing, Amy has several clear self esteem issues, and while not shy prefers to stay out of the spot light except when it gets her praise.
Andy - Jake (Life is like a movie to him, Childish)
Now Andy and Jake both share an immaturity, a love for creating persona's, a cheerful happy go lucky out look on life and a honest sense of being a nice guy. However while Andy was reasonably slow and naïve, Jake's actually pretty bright and very sharp, just not well read or book smart. Likewise Jake lacks Andy's jock traits, and closer to being the class clown that never grew up.
While Andy could be best described as just doing what feels right when it feels right. Jake's motivations are a lot deeper, on the surface it goes through he simply loves his job. But you cut down a level and it becomes clear Jake's also driven by many quite deep set morals, and strong belief in justice. And their is the fact that unlike Andy, Jake's cheerful personality hides multiple serious deeply buried psychological issues.
April - Rosa (Doesn't give a damn, Straight face most of the time)
Yeah they share a stoicism, and indifference. But I think on key difference is April's a trickster, she enjoys messing with people, playing them and just acting around in a way that will make them react. Rosa's a badass, she could probably beat a trained assassin to death with hair brush and kipper. And what's more she would probably then track down another assassin to do it again, just to prove it wasn't a fluke.
Tom Haverford - Gina (Plain annoying, style conscious)
Yeah...okay their more or less the same. Gina's just got more ego, less style.
Donna - Boyle (Up to date with fashion, cooking trends et al)
I don't know about this one, I mean Boyle kind of lacks all Donna's style and confidence.
Jerry & Kyle - Hitchcock & Scully (Fumbling Old guys who no one respects)
Indeed, just one big difference namely Jerry was a pretty great guy, who had a few moments of clumsiness blown hopeless out of proportion. Hitchock and Scully are truly a pair of lazy idiots, who could be useful if they if put their minds to it, but have long lost interest in trying.
Only Terry Crews seems to be an original (love the guy btw).
Yeah I love him to.
So yeah their are certain similarities. Still their are only so many archetypes of character out there.
reply share
If anything, Amy and Gina harks back to the brilliant Newsradio, 1994-1999, with Lisa and Beth, the ambitious overachieving reporter and the sassy secretary whose job is not even near the top of her priorities at work, respectively. If anyone here has not seen it, you absolutely should, you guys, I cannot recommend it enough.
If anything, Amy and Gina harks back to the brilliant Newsradio, 1994-1999, with Lisa and Beth, the ambitious overachieving reporter and the sassy secretary whose job is not even near the top of her priorities at work, respectively. If anyone here has not seen it, you absolutely should, you guys, I cannot recommend it enough.
I would say a new mockumentary styled show in a different universe is what they were going for. They just copied the format of The Office, but those are two completely different shows. B99 is still shot in a mockumentary style, though it is not a mockumentary. The Good Place isn't shot in that style.
I would say a new mockumentary styled show in a different universe is what they were going for. They just copied the format of The Office, but those are two completely different shows. B99 is still shot in a mockumentary style, though it is not a mockumentary. The Good Place isn't shot in that style.
Escuse me? B99 is not shot as a mocumentary. Single camera though but that's just a part of the mocumentary formula.
What are you talking about? It is shot in a mockumentary STYLE. The camera is constantly zooming and coming in in the middle of action. It's not shot like a scripted show where you see a scene from start to finish (you miss action, like you would in real life). That is what the mockumentary style is. It's not intending to present the show as a documentary, but it's shooting in a documentary style.
At no point did I say this show is a mockumentary, which is what you're insinuating. It's done in a mockumentary style. If they added interviews to it, it would be a nearly identical format to The Office or Parks and Rec. That's how close it is to a mockumentary in style.