He just isnt. If he insists on casting himself in his films he should know he's better off as a supporting character and not a leading man.
'When there's no more room in Hollywood, remakes shall walk the Earth.'
Tyler Perry puts himself into his movies so he can surround himself with gorgeous women. So in reality, Tyler is a giant perv.
Check out Cloo: http://www.cloo.com/
Since he's not on the poster and it's an ensemble cast, I doubt he's the lead in this like he was in Good Deeds and Alex Cross.
sharePeople in the theater groaned when his character showed up and downright laughed when he tried to pull off a romantic scene. Kinda pathetic that you the writer have to write in dialogue where someone calls you fine, only way its gonna happen
Lena Dunham does the same thing on Girls, which she created, co-produces, and writes. She's dumpy and frumpy but always gets hot guys and has them tell her how beautiful she is.
.
he is better as a leading lady.
shareHe wasn't a leading man in this movie, he was a supporting character.
share[deleted]