MovieChat Forums > The Principle (2014) Discussion > It's 2015, and we're seeing this.

It's 2015, and we're seeing this.


Einstein, Newton, and Galileo must be rolling in their graves. How sad that in the 21st century this kind of absurd non-scientific nonsense still apparently not only exists, but actually finds an audience of the ignorant, deluded, and foolish to watch it. Amazing.

reply

You don't have a clue of what you're talking about. If you knew the science behind this as much as you're pretending to know, you would at least agree it's an issue with modern astrophysics and cosmology, as most physicists do. When you throw a rant like that, it proves how you are the one who is ignorant, deluded and foolish.

reply

Don't make me laugh. There is no "science" behind this. Sungenis is not a scientist, and has no credentials. This "documentary" is a denial of science at it's core, it's misleading, disingenous, and sets out to prove preconceived religious ideas far outside of the mainstream, to say the least. There is no "issue" with modern astrophysics or astronomy. The issue is when people drag out their ancient book of myths and fables to attempt to explain a universe that is only partially understood.

reply

The issue is how the Cosmological Principle is an unwarranted assumption. That's all. If you're seeing any denial of science or preconceived religious ideas, you're just proving my point.

You can pretend superiority as much as you want, but I'm pretty sure you'll prove your ignorance with every comment, just like you did.

Let's see you hang yourself even more. Give one example of what you're saying. At which point it denies science, and how. Let's see if it's really denying science, or if it's you who is really ignorant and deluded here.

reply

No, the issue is selling pseudo-science and mysticism as valid theory or rather valid alternative theory, which is what Sungenis has been trying to do for years. These are the same tactics used by the creationists, the intelligent design people, the historical revisionists like him. Quote-mining, deception, out-of-context presentation, these are all the hallmarks of the snake oil salesman that he is. I'm not buying.

reply

So far you are only ranting and proving how you are the one who is ignorant and deluded. Come on... if it's such a fraud, it should be easy for you to come up with a single example and prove your claims with rational arguments. Don't you have anything better than personal attacks after such a pretty entrance?

reply

What are YOU trying to prove?

reply

Just did. Thanks.

reply

Whatever. The sun orbits the Earth, which is flat. Is that what you're really trying to say?

reply

I'm not trying to say anything other than what I said explicitly, which is to ask you to provide some substantive argument to your claims, but it's obvious you can't do that. You're just ranting, pretending to know what you are talking about, but you can't produce a single argument.

Not a surprise. You're not the first one, and certainly won't be the last.

reply

What "claim" are you talking about?

reply

Any of them. You want me to choose one? OK, it won't make any difference, since I'm sure you won't defend it anyway, you'll just keep playing your little act.


This "documentary" is a denial of science at it's core, it's misleading, disingenous, and sets out to prove preconceived religious ideas far outside of the mainstream, to say the least.


reply

That's my opinion. I stand by it. I consider geocentrism (or any revisionary conceptualization of it) to be an absurd, long-debunked concept. I consider Robert Sungenis to be a seriously deluded and dangerous propagandist. I especially detest Holocaust deniers, of which he is one. I also detest creationists, "intelligent design" believers, moon landing hoax believers, and flat-Earthers. Which of those memes exactly were you defending?

reply

That's my opinion. I stand by it.


That's your argument? Hahahaha...

I knew you were going to prove my point, but I thought you were smarter than that. What a joke.

reply

Obviously I'm not a genius like you who knows the Earth is the center of the universe and can prove it mathematically. Oh well, we can't all be Einsteins.

reply

Don't play ironic now, buddy. You were the one who said it's pseudoscience and a fraud, and now your best argument to defend that criticism is to say it's just your opinion. That's ludicrous, but not unexpected.

It's pretty obvious from your first post that you don't have a clue of what you're talking about, you don't really understand the physics behind what you're talking, but how far can you go on deviating from the questions?

Obviously I'm not a genius like you who knows the Earth is the center of the universe and can prove it mathematically.


I never said it is, nor Sungenis or Dr. Bennet would say something stupid like that. Now, the real question is, can you prove it isn't? Can you even present any evidence that it isn't without resorting to the assumptions of the cosmological principle?

Can you prove anything of what you're saying or is it just "your opinion", directly out of your ass?

Oh well, we can't all be Einsteins.


Ah, come on Einstein. Show us your guns. I'm really interested in what you have to show for all the circus you created here. Come on, don't be a coward. The worst that can happen is for you to embarrass yourself.

reply

I won't be rude and write here what I think you and Sungenis can go do with each other (or perhaps are already doing). Besides we all know it's turtles all the way down, right?

reply

You can be rude as much as you want, as long as in the end you have an actual argument, but you don't really have any, do you? You have no idea of what you're talking about. 8 posts of nonsense and your best argument was coming up with "it's my opinion, directly out of my ass".

reply

You must be a salesman in your real life, you talk till people either buy something or drop dead of boredom. No go ahead and marry your Holocaust denier pal and have many children together.

reply

[deleted]

It makes me sad that i am forced to give this 1 star out of 10.

reply

How could a star that has 330,000 times the mass of earth revolve around the earth in a gravity-based orbit? It's a retarded theory. These people who think that humans are special and the earth is somehow the centre of the universe are poor, deluded, uneducated fools. Have some humility and read more books.

Cardboard Box is the Future.

reply

How could a star that has 330,000 times the mass of earth revolve around the earth in a gravity-based orbit?


Bodies revolve around the center of mass of a system, and the Solar System doesn't exist isolated from the rest of the universe. Sorry, but this is elementary physics. You should educate yourself instead of pretending superiority and betraying your ignorance on the first phrase.

It's a retarded theory.


No. Just you.

These people who think that humans are special and the earth is somehow the centre of the universe are poor, deluded, uneducated fools.


Can you prove it isn't? There's a $100,000 prize if you can. Good luck.

reply

The current year is not relevant in science.

reply

Have you watched it?

"Never eat yellow snow" 

reply

Of course he hasn't watched it otherwise he would be praising the movie for it's breakthrough science just like everyone else who has seen it is doing. Thank God atheism is dying out:)

reply

That's what I thought. I have one or two issues with their conclusions but the generalisations made did not seem to have anything to do with the film that I watched. Whether you agree with their findings or not.

"Never eat yellow snow" 

reply

Yup, it's from the same old boring leftist play book, keep throwing crap and hope it sticks, but under no circumstances make a rational argument or use science or facts. Their time is nearly at an end anyway so who cares about lefties, they are irrelevant now.

reply

"Breakthrough science"? Just what part would that be? Atheism is dying out? I think your absurd belief in invisible sky-men is what's really dying out, and none too soon.

reply

Tick tock, tick tock...

reply

Compared to Scientism nonsense by Corporate Scientology? It's often difficult to choose which wackiness I want to indulge in. Real Science ain't real science anymore.

reply