Which part of the liberal agenda is this?

If you want to be scared of being nice to people and acknowledging that there are different races that's OK. Just say it.

On an average day, I work with the follow people:

Chinese descent (Hunan)
Egyptian immigrant
Latvian immigrant
Haitian immigrant
Mexican descent
Croatian descent (me)
Spanish descent
Norwegian descent

The others, I do not know nor care to ask. What you see above is not picking and choosing, those are the standard scheduled staff and no-one cares. Hell, half of them vote conservative and voted for Trump.

It's OK to be afraid of diversity. Just say it. "I'm afraid of other cultures."

Try saying it to yourself. "I'm afraid of other cultures and colors"

Say it again. "Some people are different than me and it makes me afraid."

I guess I'll forego the creatively smart-alec response since Janos handled that so well (kudos).

I'm not really sure what you meant with your opening paragraph, or at least what you meant to imply, but it didn't seem to answer my question about how the three core elements supported the progressive agenda. So we'll come back to this.

In your second paragraph you mention the all-white bad-guys. If this is your argument are you meaning to say that this was the point of the movie? That above the message of fighting back, of defending what's yours, banding together in unity for a common good, that the core message of the movie is that white people are bad? If so, then we have very different take-aways from this story.

While I do think that having Ron Burgundy as part of the Magnificent 7 would have made this movie a sure fire 10 rating, I again don't get what point you're trying to make. You could almost use this as allegory for American history. All throughout our time as a country whenever we have needed a call to arms (literally or metaphorically speaking), that call has been answered by people of all races who selflessly drop their racial identity to embrace their national identity and push America forward. How many blacks, Japanese, and Mexicans gave up everything they had to fight in the war? Even in the revolution there were blacks fighting for freedom. The pursuit of liberty and freedom from oppressors is not a white ideal, it's the ideal of all who love liberty. As a white lover of liberty, and mans right to fight for himself, I love seeing that achieved by any race or color. So I'm really not sure how Denzel's supposed rainbow coalition is offensive, since it really reflects American history. Are you ashamed of American history?

To go back to your first paragraph, I think this may be an example of how not to argue with someone you disagree with. First of all it doesn't directly refute any of my statements, and secondly it doesn't seem to really support any of your own statements. The bad guy says capitalism is God. Is this good or bad, to you, that he says it? It seems to me, in my libertarian-conservative view, that this is a bad thing. Capitalism equals good, capitalism does not equal God. Rampant capitalism was not a virtue of the founding fathers, it was actually something that they put safeguards in place for. Capitalisms power grew when Andrew Jackson expanded the Fed. John Quincy Adams actually fought vigorously against Jackson as an anti-fed proponent. Now I know that some are programmed to think that communism is evil and capitalism is the holy system of the Lord. But while communism is in fact evil, capitalism is not perfect just because it's better. You see, unchecked capitalism creates oppression. The founding fathers knew this and it's why they worked to prevent it's over-proliferation. Communism and UN-CHECKED capitalism are not too different in the end. Communism is, in simple terms, where the government controls business, and with UN-CHECKED capitalism we get business controlling the government. Either way, the individual looses independence and freedom to control their own life.

So to me, yes, a person yelling capitalism IS God would seem like a very bad thing. Especially when juxtaposed against everyday Americans who are working to provide for themselves and humbly turning to God in their trouble. And since we know how much you racists, I mean detractors, require accuracy in the movie, we obviously couldn't have had him shouting about communism since that wasn't an issue in this given environment and would have been historically out of place.

So if you could please explain to me what it was I didn't pick up on, and just how is it I seemed to be programmed?

Liberals claim to love "others ideas", until they find out people actually have other ideas.

I'm pretty sure the black guy shooting chairs out was a show in speed and accuracy but by all means make up whatever you'd like. Fear is a powerful thing.




But wait a minute what about Chicago?

Exactly.





Liberals claim to love "others ideas", until they find out people actually have other ideas.

It must be hard for you to hate what you don't understand. Don't worry, as a Christian, I'll take you in when you get into the wrong fight. I'm sorry that you feel this way.