MovieChat Forums > Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) Discussion > Good Luck Topping This, Warner Bros.

Good Luck Topping This, Warner Bros.

posted 10 years ago by mightymac101
89 replies | jump to latest

I agree with everything but wishing them luck. I wish them no luck at all.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=119757

The action-packed flick is a thoroughly entertaining and enjoyable experience. If you're a comic book fan, it's impossible not to love this!

"Avengers: Age of Utron is proof that Marvel can do no wrong, and as they continue to add new players to the table and reshape the world in a way which keeps it feeling exciting and fresh, Warner Bros. and their plans for a DC Cinematic Universe will have to do a lot to come anywhere close to replicating the kind of quality on display here. One thing's for sure regardless: Joss Whedon will be sorely missed, and Earth's Mightiest Heroes won't be the same without him..."

[–] mightymac101 9 years ago

Good to see so many agree. Icicles have a better chance of lasting in hell than the WB has of topping this film.

[–] guydood13 9 years ago

Warner bros already topped this MAD MAX fury road. Everyone besides you fanboys agree that mad max *beep* on every movie marvel has done.

[–] mightymac101 9 years ago

Avengers AoU made more on its opening three days than Mad Max did to this moment to date.

[–] blackdoug 9 years ago

Most refreshingly of all, Age of Ultron specificity feels much more intimate and nuanced than its predecessor. Avengers was great as an action filled payoff to Marvel’s Phase One but this movie delivers that and so much more.

[–] ace217 9 years ago

Mad Max Fury Road already topped this movie.

if you're talking about DC, then there's a little know movie called The Dark Knight. watch that movie

[–] mightymac101 9 years ago

There are better cures for insomnia but not many.

[–] ace217 9 years ago

what?

[–] steverok 9 years ago

Shouldn't be hard.

[–] SpanishRicky 9 years ago

Marvel simply can't be topped at this point. maybe in 2028 or later.

[–] IronBallsM 9 years ago

A smart man makes a mistake, learns from it, and never makes that mistake again. But a wise man finds a smart man and learns from him how to avoid the mistake altogether.

[–] billbrown7071 9 years ago

Just So everyone Knows The OP....lol and at least 17 replies in this thread are from the Same Person...Literally Just 1 Person....The Uber Troll

these are some of Uber's Sock accounts...

avengers1234
captainamerica50
glittergulch
shadowsouL
tseybert
Top10dude
stargatesam
unfavorabledude
millthrill
Sonicrules
SpanishRicky
xdome
elle-nino
verlander0
zefman2
redoddball
doetreve
shacklefort
tttl4077
peabodymaster
twogunbud
krieg8814254
scotts863
thorcap3
John_T_Chance
ba_bam_bam
ramonalejandrosuarez
sidfargas
magicmarky
DUKEJBM
T-eschberger
movieman444222-1
Uberiffic
demers8687
kinberg101
wormie1138
Coneydogg
tttl4077
indysoul
hrmnrabb
demers8687
sacflyzone
rockerdude22
kinberg101
yumpinyimany

Over 50% of the replies are from Uber's Sock Account...almost all of The Accounts I listed above were made at the exact same time in 2005, They All Post in The exact same threads for at least 4 years now On 8 different Boards(All MCU films), They all have the same exact opinions(Extremely Positive toward MCU films) and They all have Deep hatred for Chris Nolan.

leemall-"Paul Walkers Death Had Zero Impact On F7's Hype And Box Office Results"

[–] doenormaaljoh 9 years ago

I'm not too impressed by all this. For instance the movie "Watchmen" from 2009 was about a few times better than this Avengers mishap imho.

[–] !!!deleted!!! (20131489) 9 years ago

Agreed

[–] blackdoug 9 years ago

A Disney statement characterizes the move as a continued centralization of film functions along with those of Pixar and Lucasfilm, though friction between Feige and Perlmutter was widely reported.

[–] srb-3 9 years ago

Disney more or less *gets* MARVEL. These days the WB has n0 clue what to do with DC. Simple as that.

OK so A2 isn't as good as A1. Guess what? It's still a decent MARVEL movie. B v. S and SS will open big and then bomb. Rightly so.

[–] gljbradley 9 years ago

This!^ Despite how Disney is with Marvel sometimes, they overall allow Marvel to do their own thing. Whereas with WB with DC...I honestly don't know anymore. I don't understand why WB don't give DC their own movie studio instead of being so overbearing with DC's film situation?

[–] srb-3 9 years ago

Right gljbradley, the WB used to be hands off with DC. Since 2010, that is no longer true. With the moving DC from NYC the publishing capital of the planet, to Burbank so that the WB can micromanage DC. As you can tell, overall the results are terrible.

[–] StarkTech 9 years ago

Too many cooks ruin the recipe. Plus, DC has weak character depth to start with.

[–] gljbradley 9 years ago

Indeed. It's like WB is more focused on having absolute control over DC's businesses in order to catch up to Marvel, and not allowing DC to have a say in their own properties and allowing them to do their own thing. I'm starting to think that they're too money-hungry, impatient, and controlling to give DC their own movie studio to help DC's films get a much needed boost. I could be wrong but do you realize how much of a difference and how successful DC would be if they had their own movie studio(while still being one of WB's subsidiaries)? And as you and a lot of other people are saying, the move from New York to Burbank seem to have thrown a serious monkey wrench into their system.

[–] srb-3 9 years ago

Indeed. It's like WB is more focused on having absolute control over DC's businesses in order to catch up to Marvel, and not allowing DC to have a say in their own properties and allowing them to do their own thing. I'm starting to think that they're too money-hungry, impatient, and controlling to give DC their own movie studio to help DC's films a much needed boost. I could be wrong but do you realize how much of a difference and how successful DC would be if they had their own movie studio(while still being one of WB's subsidiaries)? And as you and a lot of other people are saying, the move from New York to Burbank seem to have thrown a serious monkey wrench into their system.

glibradley when you're right, you're right.

[–] Dash1969 9 years ago

Very very much right.

[–] gljbradley 9 years ago

Thank you very, very much.

[–] gljbradley 9 years ago

Thank you.