MovieChat Forums > The Central Park Five (2014) Discussion > OJ Simpson case

OJ Simpson case

posted 12 years ago by marbleann
2 replies | jump to latest

Lately some guy told the Discovery channel that his brother killed Nicole Simpson. Now I believe OJ killed his wife. BUT I believe like this case people are trying their best to dismiss this other guy for the same reason people want keep on saying that these guys raped that woman. They don't want to believe that something they were sure about they might have been wrong about. Now the Discovery channel is not like TMZ. I believe if if this convicts DNA evidence was discovered to be around Nicole because of new technology and it exonerated OJ no one would still believe it. Jesus Christ can rise from the grave and say this man was guilty and many of these folks would not believe it.

The story I am not ready to believe yet but somethings sound true. The man claims OJ wanted these diamond earrings back they he gave Nicole and asked this guy to break into the house. OJ is such a greedy MF I can believe that. Remember he got caught stealing those watches, so I am not ready to dismiss this guy yet. But I am opened to see what pans out. But to many people no matter what happens OJ did it just like they think those boys raped that woman.

[–] There_Is_No_Sayid 11 years ago

I think the OJ case is a good example of the disparities of justice in America. There was a lot of evidence connecting OJ to the murder. But he a) didn't confess and b) was rich. So he got off. In contrast the Central Park Five DID confess and they were mostly working class so they got off

Unless Alpert's covered in bacon grease, I don't think Hugo can track anything.

[–] marbleann 11 years ago

They had a bad case as far as OJ was concerned. My father was a NYPD Homicide Detective and as soon as he saw Mark Furmans name he said they had a bad case. Even if you think Furman was a nice cop just the inference that he was a dirty cop could put the case and question and they would of done anything to keep him off the stand if they could of. They had a bad chain of evidence also. Personally I think he did it. But it was a weak case.
The Central park case those boys did nothing and was forced to confess. And if you think they still did it well you know little of the case.
Who you should of compared was Robert Blake who was caught at the scene with the murder weapon in his hand. Another bad case. In which Blake got off too.