The Mummy: Or Ramses The Damned novel by Anne Rice (1989) (Features two mummies, one male and one female)
Are you Afraid of the Dark? Season 3 Episode 8 The Guardian's Curse (1993)
Buffy The Vampire Slayer Season 1 (1997) had an episode featuring a female Mummy.
Double Dragon 3 video game.
The Second Mummy in the Disney Channel movie Undwer Wraps (1997)
Highlander The Series Season 2 episode The Pharaoh's Daughter (A female immortal is wrapped up as a mummy. She's only revived when her cause of death is removed)
Utrasylvania - A graphic novel series from 2012 in which the classic monsters are world leaders. The Mummy is a powerful and sinister (yet deceptively beautiful) woman.
Also Hammer's Blood From The Mummy's Tomb and The Awakening, both adaptations of Bram Stoker's novel The Jewel of Seven Stars, and if you go into Victorian literature there are tons of examples. Off the top of my head "Lost in a Pyramid; or The Mummy's Curse" comes to mind, which not only features a vengeful female mummy but is in fact written by a woman, Louisa May Alcott. Another is "Iras: A Mystery" by H.D. Everett.
yeah,but you know what? it's still political casting and your post is so smug and willfully clueless about the place this decision is coming from and why people are bothered by it that i just don't care.
ps. my manliness will survive a female mummy. it's survived worse.
That defensiveness doesn't exactly help prove your case other than reinforce my own preconceived notion of what is going on at this board. Was it political when H. P. Lovecraft used a female Mummy? or Universal studios in 1944. Female leads shouldn't cause a knee jerk reaction, Mr. Trump.
All you are doing is proving my assumption of those posting on this board. A faithful adaptation of Carmilla would probably invoke a reaction from you along the lines of "Ewww Lesbians! They're only doing that to be PC." Oblivious to the fact that it's a vampire novel that predates Dracula by over twenty years.
5y old logic detected. If they say it's not true, than surely that's proof enough it is.
This is not some new idea to hurt your manliness.
And what it also isn't would be a reboot of any of those movies with female Mummies. If you want to look for a reason for the casting, maybe you should be asking why they aren't rebooting one of those instead. Heck. With all new cast of characters, I fail to see a reason for reboot instead of new franchise to begin with.
reply share
The Mummy isn't a particular story. The first Universal studios one isn't the plot of the 1990s one, and the Hammer one is not the plot of The Living Mummy by Marvel comics.
The Mummy is a type of creature. Suppose the movie was called "The werewolf." Would you then seek out every film with that title and anticipate the same plot? I would hope not. One of them bastardizes Native American skinwalkers.
You're trying very hard to cling to your first impression and it's not aiding you or how you are being perceived by on-lookers.
If they actually chose to follow the version starring Boris Karloff you probably wouldn't recognize it, worse yet, it would be accused of white washing for using an Englishman to play a North African undead-immortal.
1) Apologies. I assumed it was a reboot of the trilogy.
2) I honestly even prefer that. And by "that" I mean not sticking to the same plot for the reboot.
3) Honestly no idea what impression. Personally I have no issues with this version since I have yet to see it. People just get more deffencive about these things due to all the push for "diversity" lately. Even to the point of seeing it where it isn't.
4) Probably not. But that has maybe something to do with the fact that when that movie came out my gran was the same age as I when the 1999 version released.
Even if you stick solely to the Universal series that this film is rebooting, "The Mummy" still does not apply solely to one character, and the female mummy of Ananka was a key figure in several of them.
And that's all beside the point that neither Imhotep nor Kharis has been genderbent. This is a new character. In fact Kharis, or some other male Mummy by a different name, may even still be in this. Javier Botet is in the film and he's known for being a creature performer, much like Doug Jones is.
"That defensiveness doesn't exactly help prove your case other than reinforce my own preconceived notion of what is going on at this board." "All you are doing is proving my assumption of those posting on this board."
well,naturally. you're a third wave feminist so everything is about circular logic with you. it allows you to win the argument in your own mind without the effort.
"Was it political when H. P. Lovecraft used a female Mummy?"
no,because he wasn't trying to pander to people like you. besides,he would have been too busy with his horrible,virulent racism.
"or Universal studios in 1944."
see my previous answer and stop trying to escape into the past. this is 2016,okay? things have changed. that's why we're on this stupid board having this stupid argument about this stupid movie.
"Female leads shouldn't cause a knee jerk reaction, Mr. Trump."
thanks mrs. clinton! they don't. not a big fan of whorish gimmicks though.
"A faithful adaptation of Carmilla would probably invoke a reaction from you along the lines of "Ewww Lesbians! They're only doing that to be PC."
and WHY would i react that way when they were just being faithful to the novel? the short answer is...I WOULDN'T! also,men are definitely known for a specific reaction to lesbian vampires and it definitely isn't "ewwwww".
"Oblivious to the fact that it's a vampire novel that predates Dracula by over twenty years."
wrong again. i've been aware of the book for many years and watched the most recent adaptation of it("styria")last year.
well,naturally. you're a third wave feminist so everything is about circular logic with you. it allows you to win the argument in your own mind without the effort.
Hardly.
I don't think the Frankenstein Monster in Penny Dreadful is an MRA.
I find "empowered" Belle in Once Upon a Time to be annoying and cold.
I didn't like the 2016 Ghostbusters, which apparently is a pre-requisite.
And I hated both Cursed (or as I call it "Smurfette werewolf") and Syfy's Van Helsing. If you're going to do female Van Helsing, make her like Professor Abraham, damn it. Not a Walking Dead knock off. I'd rather an older woman play a Peter Cushing style Van Helsing.
I'm no third wave Feminist. I'm a Mary Wollstoncraft feminist (that's late eighteenth century / early nineteenth century). I believe in the actual equality of the genders, not the "women are better than men" garbage. Don't insult me like that. And don't slap a label on me just to dismiss my views.
And honestly I don't see anything wrong with a female Mummy. A mummy is a type of monster, not a particular character. You never see people complain about female ghosts or female vampires. I find the complaints to be... needless to say, weird. There have been female mummies in the past.
If the 1990s Mummy movie actually had the plot of the Karloff film it might raise my eyebrows but really it didn't.
I don't want a female mummy to be a gimmick either but if you keep reacting this way we'll get another idiotic gimmick marketing of how if we don't like it we're anti-woman. I don't like being told I'm a "Traitor" for not liking the 2016 Ghostbusters so kindly don't be part of the problem that leads to people turning a new monster movie into a cause.
If it sucks it sucks. But it shouldn't be dismissed right out of hand just because the lead is female. A female Ghostbusters COULD have been good but it was just terribly written. A female Van Helsing COULD have been good but Syfy / Universal has no faith in the original character and turned her into a gimmicky walking dead knock off with Mary Sue magical blood, when what I yearned for was closer to Tilda Swinton dressed in nineteenth century drag, kindly and seemingly doctor by day, and Dracula's enemy and intellectual equal by night.
I'm bitter about Syfy's Van Helsing becuase it could have been good. Female isn't the problem. Treating gender like a gimmick is, making it the full sum of the character, is.
Let's not focus on the reproductive organs but instead focus on if it's good or bad. Sony's Ghostbusters reboot = bad.
"I believe in the actual equality of the genders, not the "women are better than men" garbage."
could have fooled me,but if so then good.
"Don't insult me like that. And don't slap a label on me just to dismiss my views."
but that's what you did to me.
"If it sucks it sucks."
yes.
"Female isn't the problem. Treating gender like a gimmick is, making it the full sum of the character, is."
yes.
"Let's not focus on the reproductive organs but instead focus on if it's good or bad. Sony's Ghostbusters reboot = bad."
couldn't agree with you more.
"A female Ghostbusters COULD have been good but it was just terribly written. A female Van Helsing COULD have been good"
true.
"And honestly I don't see anything wrong with a female Mummy."
if i'm going to be totally objective,there isn't. look,the way i reacted to this gets back to the political climate and things like the ghostbusters remake and the people who championed it. like i said,THE PLACE IT'S COMING FROM. you seem like a very different person now than the one who started this thread, and if you feel this way about these things including being called a traitor by third wave SJW feminists then what the hell are we fighting about? i'm not sure why you began with this knee jerk hyper defensive/aggresive attitude if you actually know where i'm coming from. and i certainly don't think that objecting to the sort of gimmicky pandering that you and i have now both cited is danger of turning these franchises into a cause,leastways not one opposite from the one that they now are. i initially recognized you as someone part of the problem that IS turning them into a cause. now i don't know what to think.
"I'd rather an older woman play a Peter Cushing style Van Helsing."
"I believe in the actual equality of the genders, not the "women are better than men" garbage."
could have fooled me,but if so then good.
When did I say anyting that indicated otherwise?
if i'm going to be totally objective,there isn't. look,the way i reacted to this gets back to the political climate and things like the ghostbusters remake and the people who championed it. like i said,THE PLACE IT'S COMING FROM. you seem like a very different person now than the one who started this thread, and if you feel this way about these things including being called a traitor by third wave SJW feminists then what the hell are we fighting about? i'm not sure why you began with this knee jerk hyper defensive/aggresive attitude if you actually know where i'm coming from. and i certainly don't think that objecting to the sort of gimmicky pandering that you and i have now both cited is danger of turning these franchises into a cause,leastways not one opposite from the one that they now are. i initially recognized you as someone part of the problem that IS turning them into a cause. now i don't know what to think.
Because I have seen female mummies before and to react negatively just because it is female is to feed right into the hands of those who would make it a gimmick. Don't let them. Let the movie stand on it's own for better or worse. Don't feed into the "War of the sexes" angle. That should not be a factor here.
well,don't quit your day job yet ebert,you may not be cut out to be a critic after all.
"And way to prove your manliness by being so insulted over a female mummy, I bet girls fall upon you like in the body spray comercials."
(schwarzenegger voice) I AM JOSHUA CARPINO. I AM SO MANLY. YOU WILL NOT DEFY THE MANLINESS OF JOSHUA CARPINO(they're probably gonna think i'm serious).
"And because this is 2016 everything has to be a 'gimmick'? Jesus F Christ, you're astoundingly paranoid... I bet you think the election is rigged."
how can somebody so smug be so naive?
"And way to prove CVD right about you feeling threatened."
because i DARED respond to her with logic!
"Are you even a horror fan? Just curious."
what makes you think i'm not? never mind,don't care. i'm THE horror fan mother *beep*
by the way,i see a bunch of your posts are about you making fun of SJWs on the ghostbusters remake board. YOU'RE A *beep* SJW!!!!! what,did you just become one over the last 2 months?! that's pathetic! did you think the girls would "fall upon you like in the body spray commercials"?
know what i'm gonna do now? i'm gonna go watch the karloff version of the mummy. a real horror movie.
Styria did suck, astoundingly I might add considering it took almost nothing fronm Le Fanu's book and pretty much made stuff up alomg the way, includinh the whole town knowing of her existence, were was that in the book? The Vampire Lovers is a much more faithful adaptation (flawed but still), a few tweeks would have made it better.
I'm not naivemp, I'm just not an insecure paranoid like you. You saw my posting history and saw how I mocked Ghostbusters... THAT was a politcally motivated movie, this one is not...
And define 'logic'. Calling CVD a third wave feminist and me of all people a SJW for actually finding the idea of a female mummy interesting? I dont thin that word means what you think it means, seriously.
And you do realize no one takes seriously a statement like "i'm THE horror fan...", right?
You're just a joke and a bad one at that. Watxhing the Karloff movie doesnt make you a horror fan, defending whatever the hell you are defending does not make you a horror fan. Getting so worked up over a female movie most definitely does not make you a horror fan, it just makes you look pathetic, seriously.
In fact, you're the Milli Vanilli of horror fans.
Go READ Carmilla and watch Styria again and I dare you to defend it.
by the way,i see a bunch of your posts are about you making fun of SJWs on the ghostbusters remake board. YOU'RE A *beep* SJW!!!!! what,did you just become one over the last 2 months?! that's pathetic! did you think the girls would "fall upon you like in the body spray commercials"?
Being okay with the concept of female Mummy does not immediately mean SJW. As I said, it's people like you that lead to marketing ploys that try to convince people they're sexist if they don't like this or that. It's people like you that will cause this to become a political issue instead of just an interesting mummy story.
Also Kerloff's franchise = had the first cinematic female mummy or do you skip the ones you don't like and or only watch the first? Dracula's daughter must have really blown your mind.
yes,of course. i also have a signed affidavit from the CIA that they engineered the kennedy assassination and another one from the chinese food place across the street that they're responsible for the disappearance of my cat.
"Because I haven't seen anything to suggest that at all."
well,as per your previous question,you're not the most worldly of people.
In other words the only reason you believe that this is a politically motivated film is because you just...decided it is. Because you saw a woman cast in the title role.
Face it, punk. You have NOTHING. You're just another entitled misogynist crybaby. No horror fan worth his salt would be so dismissive of feminism when one of the pillars of the genre is as feminist as they come. And if you can't figure out who I'm talking about, you'll only prove my point.
My mind tends to not fully register someone as a Mummy if I don't see them walking around in the bandages, hence why I often forget the female Mummies in the Universal films. The Mummy's Ghost is my favorite.
I'm glad that they cast someone who from North Africa in the role.
Is this going be a gender flipping of the usual story? I really don't want something that seems like just another version of that Bram Stoker novel.
My mind tends to not fully register someone as a Mummy if I don't see them walking around in the bandages, hence why I often forget the female Mummies in the Universal films.
Technically, someone has to have been mummified to be a mummy. I wouldn't consider a normal person possessed by the spirit of someone who had been mummified as a mummy themself.
reply share
Is this going be a gender flipping of the usual story? I really don't want something that seems like just another version of that Bram Stoker novel.
Of course not, you've made it no secret that you hate Bram Stoker.
As for the plot, no one is sure yet except for the basic feature of a Mummy returned to life doing spooky Mummy business. The casting of Javier Botet has me thinking that the central figure played by Sofia Boutella is not necessarily the only Mummy in the film.
Is this going be a gender flipping of the usual story? I really don't want something that seems like just another version of that Bram Stoker novel.
At this point you have proven your place, in that you only show up where I am active to antagonize me because I could have sworn I was a "self-loathing Gamer gate mysogynist" for not liking the Ghostbusters remake or Van Helsing but I defend The Mummy and you decide to take the opposite stance just to be contrary.
Yeah, root out the posers! The Mummy's Ghost didn't have a female mummy. Amina had been a normal college student in the previous film and was the reincarnation of Ananka; she wasn't mummified.
The mummy in Blood from the Mummy's Tomb barely moved at the end, so it was little more than a prop.
When I heard they were doing a female-mummy in the reboot, my brain went straight to the possibilities of backstories for the new mummy. They could do a fantastical version of the story of Hatshepsut. Nefetiti would be another who they could use pieces of her story to weave into the backstory of their mummy. I admit, as a history nerd, I love the idea of a female mummy because of all the historical pieces that could be put into the movie.