Finished Season 1, A Question about Season 2
I finished season 1 and I would rate Broadchurch as a great drama, series rather than a great mystery series.
I really liked the overall feel to the show, the acting, the direction, the camerawork, its all just top class.
With mysteries like this there is often a take it or leave it element to the 'whodunnit' aspect, and personally for me it was a let down. It seemed they all sat around and said okay guys who really is the least likely guy, and once we settle on him, we will pin a reason for him to have done it.
It is often the reason part that is the key. Often in great mysteries, when the killer is revealed, there are two elements to is - 1) Usually not the first person you would think of, 2) it could really have been no one else, once everything comes to light. That is to say, while no doubt another person could have done it, the person who is revealed to have done it, is the best fit.
With Broadchurch, in conclusion it never felt like it was the most natural choice. Almost any of the suspects could have done it. I as not greatly pleased about the motive either. It seemed a case of okay 'X' is the least likely guy, now lets find a reason for him to have done so. With so many things going on, perhaps another person, with another better motive would have made for a better reveal.
However this issue apart, season 1 was just top notch.
So now the reason why I did this post, I have read up on season 2 a little bit, and it seems to be a continuation of season 1. Now the question I want to ask is, does this season 2, naturally flow from season 1, or does it feel like Broadchurch was meant to be a one season show, but then for season 2, they opted to sort of attach it to season 1, as we already care for the characters. Does the sequel seem forced?
Secondly is it still the same show. Season 1 was a detectove work, but does season 2 take the detective element away and become a courtroom drama. If it does, then is it a better show for it?
Thx