Never say never. Somebody at ABC likes it or it would've been gone already. The "Shark Tank" episode got decent ratings (all things considered) during November sweeps and now they've pulled it off the air for February sweeps -- on the surface that may look like a crappy move but, with the bizarre logistics of Neilsen Ratings, the sweeps periods are one of the biggest factors when yearly ratings are tallied, so yanking it for the month helps ensure its overall yearly score won't get worse. That said, the ratings aren't the all-important deciding factor that they used to be...
The show is in it's second season, which is 44 episodes in the can and it's produced by ABC, which would profit if they could get enough episodes to get a syndication deal. "According to Jim," "8 Simple Rules," "Grounded for Life," "Less Than Perfect, "Rules of Engagement" and jeez. ALL of the recent NBC sitcoms have lasted longer than they had any right to ratings-wise because they were banking on the shows having an afterlife in reruns. This one has a particular edge since there aren't many family friendly sitcoms lasting long enough to be syndicated these days. It's tame enough to run 5 days a week on ABC Family -- and it easily could if they shot just one more season's worth of episodes (66 episodes equals two months worth of episodes when aired once-a-day). Hell, if they produce it cheaply enough to justify back-end profits, I could see the show staying buried on Friday nights with dismal ratings for two more seasons just so they can get it into wider syndication... which is precisely what they're doing with "Last Man Standing." With that in mind, I'm not counting The Neighbors out quite yet.
reply
share