It was okay


Just okay. Hated the sidekick kid. He sucked. Didn't care for the length, and he completely missed a good chance to do his own kaiju batter (evil demon thing vs Super Mecha Death Christ).


No matter how you cut it, it's still better than anything Doug Walker or Channel Awesome has ever made, so there's that.

Give it a 7. Maybe if he makes a sequel it'll be better.


reply

the sidekick kid was amazing compared to the alien with the god awful voice.

reply

That aliens voice was the same guy who voiced Michaelangelo in the three 90s TMNT. Even I recognized it.

reply

I couldn't stop laughing when I saw the alien. The way he looked was hilarious to me

reply

I agree with the 7/10 rating.

reply

I thought it was okay at first, but the more I reflected on it, I just felt it sucked.

No matter how you cut it, it's still better than anything Doug Walker or Channel Awesome has ever made, so there's that.


Really? Because Suburban Knights and To Boldly Flee have higher ratings on imdb, and Kickassia's it about the same. Unlike AVGN: The Movie, those ratings aren't likely to go down any further because everyone's pretty much already voted on them.

reply

None of the Channel Awesome movies are particularly good, but it's kind of sad that someone with the education in film that James has, as well as an actual budget, made something that really wasn't all that much better than a movie like Kickassia which was hastily filmed in about 4 days.

reply

at least they pay for their own movie

reply

Pretty sure I had to sit through ads during the videos while watching them.

reply

please don't tell me you pirated the avgn movie

reply

Excuse me? I thought you were talking about the Channel Awesome movies now. What does pirating the AVGN movie have to do with that?

reply

If you didn't pirate the movie, you should know you need to pay to watch it, making sitting through the ads to watch the Channel Awesome movies insignificantly minor doesn't it?

reply

making sitting through the ads to watch the Channel Awesome movies insignificantly minor doesn't it?


The point isn't "Channel Awesome made me sit through ads" as much as it is "At least Channel Awesome paid for their movie" is misleading because they're still relying on people watching it in order to make money through ad revenue. Did you think it was a coincidence that each movie was split up into several parts like they were?

Whether or not James Rolfe directly charged for his movie is irrelevant to the point I'm making.

reply

"Paid" for their movies suggests that those movies had budgets. From what I saw, they just dug into their old toy boxes for props, and put on whatever cosplay fodder they had left from cons for costumes. That, or they just wore their regular clothes. As far as cameras? Seems like they just used the same cameras they use for their regular shooting, and the sound quality is never any better than an episode of their regular shows, nor is the special effects, or...anything really. I think this fellow up here is delusional and sees some kind of raised quality in the movies. I see extremely long, extremely unfunny episodes

reply

IMDB ratings don't affect how good or bad a movie is, nor do they affect my opinion or my personal rating. I do not care if other people like a movie, I do not care if other people did not like a movie. I do not care about someone else's opinion, and I do not care if people care about my opinion. I post, to discuss. I do not post to impose my ideas and tell you that you have to agree with me. That being said, every "movie" CA has made has been cheaply made, god awful parodies of themselves. In To Boldly Flee, they didn't even write most of the dialogue, they just tossed in random quotes. I swear over half of that movie is just movie quotes from other (and better) movies, made by people who actually have talent.

reply