Alex is very pretty girl


but the movie is bad.

reply

hot dude,she was sexable hot

reply

[deleted]

I don't get what you're saying. How is it not realistic? Those two women, or the mom and the girl, clearly exist in real life. And they look like that in real life. And they are someone's mother and someone's daughter in real life too. How is that unrealistic? Your claim makes zero sense. Attractive people exist in normal day to day life.

reply

Do you know she is jailbait right?

reply


She is pretty, but the movie is not bad.

Also, The previews made the blonde actress seem like she'd act badly, but she did really well!!!
The film is flawed, but its a heck of a lot better than the stink bomb known as Part 2.

"I'd say this cloud is Cumulo Nimbus."
"Didn't he discover America?"
"Penfold, shush."

reply

The movie is pretty bad, actually. She was a decent actor, but the movie was not in anyway good. From the shoddy audio to the just plain not making sense, not good. Like who in the *beep* is Robbie? If Katie abducted Hunter at the end of the second movie, how is his name now Wyatt and he's living with another family while Katie has some kid named Robbie, who came from god knows where?

Prof. Farnsworth: Oh. A lesson in not changing history from Mr. I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!

reply

This series is 'famous' for not revealing every mystery it shows, at least not right away.
Robbie's origins have not been revealed, again at least not yet.
But he was quite obviously brought into the series to introduce Toby the demon to Wyatt/Hunter in a nonthreatening way.

Wyatt/Hunter was almost surely given up for adoption by possessed Katie to avoid detection. The police were looking for a young woman with an infant.
The film does make it clear that Wyatt/Hunter can only be possessed by Toby at a certain age anyhow.
Also, a virgin is needed to complete the ceremony. Alex fits this bill as well.



I'd say this cloud is Cumulo Nimbus.
Didn't he discover America?
Penfold, shush.

reply

This series is 'famous' for not revealing every mystery it shows, at least not right away.
Robbie's origins have not been revealed, again at least not yet.


None of the other movies did it quite this badly though. It's one thing to not explain the origins of the demon, but it's another thing entirely for Hunter to just vanish from her care and a totally different child has come into her home and she's somehow lost track of Hunter.

The whole thing just doesn't work when they don't even bother to explain the most basic things. Like how did Hunter end up being taken away from Katey and end up adopted by this new family?

But he was quite obviously brought into the series to introduce Toby the demon to Wyatt/Hunter in a nonthreatening way.


Why bother? Why take Hunter away from Katey in the first place? If he grows up with Toby he would be just as unworried by him as Robbie is.

Wyatt/Hunter was almost surely given up for adoption by possessed Katie to avoid detection. The police were looking for a young woman with an infant.


That doesn't make ANY sense. She gives him up for adoption and then a couple years later finds the family who adopted him and turns the demon loose on the family? As though nobody is going to question a missing boy this time around? All she's really doing is ensuring there's a renewed manhunt. So this idea wouldn't have helped her at all.

The film does make it clear that Wyatt/Hunter can only be possessed by Toby at a certain age anyhow.
Also, a virgin is needed to complete the ceremony. Alex fits this bill as well.


None of this explains anything. How could Katey have possibly known the family Hunter would go to would have a virginal daughter? Why not indoctrinate Hunter the same way Robbie clearly has been? There's really no point in Katey willingly giving up the child, and I don't see a scenario where he was removed from her care considering what she did to get Hunter in the first place and then what was done to recover him.

This is easily the weakest of the PA movies. Not only because the Hunter\Robbie thing makes no sense, but for a plethora of other reasons which I mentioned above.

Prof. Farnsworth: Oh. A lesson in not changing history from Mr. I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!

reply

She reminded me of a teenage Lindsay Lohan. Very hot.

What are words for when no one listens anymore

reply

She is pretty girl. Emphasis on the word girl. There are way too many of you perverts/pedophiles on here.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]


How on earth is saying that a teenage actress is pretty, being a pedo??!

What is wrong with you?!


"I'd say this cloud is Cumulo Nimbus."
"Didn't he discover America?"
"Penfold, shush."

reply

Not sure if that is directed to me or not, but there is nothing wrong with saying anyone is pretty, regardless of age. However saying someone who is not of legal age is "sexable" as one of the posters above said, is coming off like a pedophile.

reply

[deleted]

A guy that's attracted to f-cking ten year olds should be shot. Freak.

reply

[deleted]

A guy that's attracted to f-cking ten year olds should be shot. Freak.

You should be shot. Psycho.

...

reply


Kathryn Newton is of legal age here. She is 17.


"I'd say this cloud is Cumulo Nimbus."
"Didn't he discover America?"
"Penfold, shush."

reply

However saying someone who is not of legal age is "sexable" as one of the posters above said, is coming off like a pedophile.

Maybe to you and other ignoramuses who don't know what the word "pedophile" means.

...

reply

reminded me of Amber Heard

reply

I agree

reply

[deleted]

She reminds me of a younger version of the actress that plays Beth on "The Walking Dead."

reply

[deleted]

She's like a young Amber Heard with a tight body in those t shirt and shorts.
I'd hit her hard!!

reply

The movie was ok, but the pedos who thought Alex was hot are truly sick individuals. You're going to take movie recommendations from pedophiles? Come on people.

reply

[deleted]

Once again, the actress is not a child. She's 17, which is legal age.
Way past legal age in many states, in fact.


I'd say this cloud is Cumulo Nimbus.
Didn't he discover America?
Penfold, shush.

reply

but still she was only 14 in this movie. Also this topic was posted two years ago when she was much younger! So they are still technically pedophiles unless they are underage themselves.

17 is still illegal in some states like California for example. I live in California and she is big no no here!

reply

Why does everyone assume that the guys making those posts aren't teenagers themselves?

reply

Okay, I fixed it.

reply

but still she was only 14 in this movie. Also this topic was posted two years ago when she was much younger! So they are still technically pedophiles unless they are underage themselves.

You clearly do not know the definition of the word "pedophile".

...

reply

The movie was ok, but the pedos who thought Alex was hot are truly sick individuals. You're going to take movie recommendations from pedophiles? Come on people.

You're an idiot, and an ignoramus who clearly does not know the definition of the word "pedophile".

...

reply