When you talk to someone from the film business, you should be more careful about your statements.
"There is no original" to you, so it means according to you that Swedish Millenium is not the first one, interesting idea...;)) You called it "Swedish adaptation". So each of media, critics, reviewers, film people, even from Hollywood are wrong except you...Teach them/us.;))
Using such argument like understanding English is always too personal and sounds arrogant.My understanding of English is surely much better than supposedly your knowledge of other languages than English...;)
"I'm sorry stilla but enough is enough" - well, it sounds a bit arrogant too,so I can say that I write my opinion, you don't have to discuss it, especially that some of my previous comments were not adressed directly to you.
reply
share
12 years ago
[deleted]
stilla-766-679078
12 years ago
Are you him? It's funny when someone writes in the name of someone and explain what he was thinking.It looks like someone has two accounts.:))
I think he doesn't need an advocate from your part and I don't need a priest;)) and if you don't like this discussion you don't have to read it - just stay away.
Your post brings nothing in this discussion, so I can't see the sense of your post.He joined our discussion so he could expect replies unless he just wanted to give statements and not to hear answers. So your strange comment about trolling him is ridiculous. Discussion = comments and replies. And check who was following whom and what was the real point of our discussion - the word "original", at least for me.
reply
share
Starling3
12 years ago
You missed the point. No one was angry about a movie, from what I can tell. The poster at the beginning of this thread said he was annoyed at Oplev being called the director of the original Girl With The Dragon Tattoo. The ensuing discussion revolved around his dispute of the facts. However, like many do when they can't defend their points, he got huffy and resorted to dismissing other people's attempts to have him prove his point. See, that's what I often notice. People are quick to say they are right, but when challenged and don't have facts to support their claims, they get angry and turn the tables to make others appear wrong.
And, he didn't say that he was giving his opinion. He said that Oplev's version was not the original. He disputed this fact.
reply
share
stilla-766-679078
12 years ago
Well, I'm afraid we are talking to the same person called "evbriclay" alias "deke8989" who seems to have two accounts. That comment addressed to me was one sided defencing one person, long and emotional, still about Fincher's evidence and the same style of writing. Using another account in the same topic proves even worse about the person itself. And again he (or rather SHE) didn't understand the point. It's enough to know that he/she called people (thinking differently than him/her ref. to Oplev's film as original) "imbeciles" on another board and now says "Let agree to disagree". :))
You will never convince people that logically Oplev's film was the original = the first one about Lisbeth Salander/Millennium story if they are so die hard Rooney Mara or Fincher's version fans. It's like their stigma...what is rather strange.
reply
share