worst movie ever


just wanna see how many agree, not get into a fight

reply

Don't agree - I've seen worse, but I definitely don't agree with those who say it's a great film. For me, it certainly is not. I know I won't watch it again. The acting of Denis Lavant is definitely amazing, too bad the actor is way more talented than the director.

reply

Funny how Lavant and Carax have worked several times before. Great film.

reply

I disagree with the OP. I was charmed and mesmerized by this oddity. I think it all depends on how one views it and what one believes Oscar is.

Once it started ... I was sucked in. I wasn't ready for it to end.

reply

The film is obviously metaphorical, and nothing (or almost nothing) is supposed to be taken literally, plus there are many references to other films and in general it's an ode to cinema (or the cinema that is dying out because of the digital age). That much is clear. And yet it is not a great film, nor it is exceptionally odd or unique (others might disagree, but I think this depends on one's knowledge of films). So many people are talking about it that my expectations were very high, and as it often happens in such cases, I was disappointed.

reply

Can you detail your disappointment?

reply

Are you suggesting that the production value alone dictates rather or not a film is good, outside of the idea itself? I happen to think the opposite. The idea behind the film is most important, production value is just icing on the cake.

But, I think I'm wrong in my assessment of your opinion.

reply

I found the film to be amazing, yet I am a fan of Leos Carax. To put succinctly, this isn't the type of film for everyone, nor is it trying to be. This film, and this type of film, is akin to modern art, in that it can be quite esoteric. I saw this while living in France and again in the US, and it gets better each time. If you like modern art, Damien Hirst, Rob Pruitt, type of artwork, then chances are this will be right up that pathway.

I won't fault anyone for disliking it as it is not the blockbuster type designed for grandiose appeal. To the OP, calling it the worst film ever has to be a bit of hyperbole, no? You're ranking that movie about a spray that gets rid of dog poop ahead of Holy Motors?

reply

worst movie ever


It's not though is it.
Not by a long shot.

Maybe you could have said; "Disappointing", or "Confusing", or "Not my cup of tea". Or even; "one of the worst movies I've ever seen".

Maybe you could have given some reasons as to why you think it's the "worst movie ever". Simply writing "worst movie ever" makes you sound like an empty-headed bratty adolescent seeking attention. And no one really wants to sound like that. Do they? I suppose these boards would often sadly indicate otherwise...

[][]::WARNING::LONG, BORING AND SANCTIMONIOUS PART IS COMMENCING::WARNING::[][]

Art, in the broadest sense of what that can encompass, is not duty bound to entertain anyone (although Holy Motors entertained me). Some things are great entertainment; The Avengers, for example, is designed to entertain and in my personal opinion succeeds. If The Avengers hadn't entertained me then that would be a problem because that is its primary function: entertainment.

However, some things are meant to function differently. Maybe they seek to make you think, or confront difficult issues, or present an experience that you may not normally encounter. Maybe they aspire to foster in you a curiosity about an abstract thought, or an atrocity, or a minority perspective. Maybe they wish to put you through the mill for 90 minutes in order to convey an idea more effectively or question received wisdom. Whatever it is, there is no rule book that states that they have to entertain anyone. Especially you specifically.

For example, I didn't find The Master entertaining. In fact, I often found it hard work and overly oblique. I did however find it beautiful to look at, fascinating and intriguing. I thought about it on and off for a good few days after watching it. I talked with other people about it. Eventually I wrote something about it. I now think that, along with Holy Motors, Cosmopolis and Once Upon a Time in Anatolia, it's one of the most complex, thought provoking and well-made films of the year. Not 'the best'. Not 'the most entertaining'. Not even 'my favourite'. But complex, well-made and thought provoking. I think it succeeds in what it set out to achieve. As does Holy Motors.

There seems to be a tendency amongst people today to demand 'entertainment' and personal enjoyment from everything, all the time. I can understand it in the young as they haven't lived long enough to engage with complex or difficult work that deals with themes as-yet alien to them. I was a teenager too once and many so-called 'great works' didn't really resonate with me until I'd garnered some real world life experience. Some good, some bad. But all useful.

But to come across adults who "won't watch subtitles", or can't handle abstraction and non-linear open-ended narrative to the point where it makes them angry is a little bit depressing. I understand, and appreciate more than most, that not everything is for everyone but I seem to encounter a lot of narcissistic solipsism these days wherein people seem to get really angry if something hasn't been created just for them or if it didn't explain everything in a really heavy-handed and obvious manner. The new-ish trend on here seems to be to inappropriately scream "PLOT HOLE!" at anything they didn't like or understand in the film. It's very weird.

In a world increasingly geared to entertaining teenagers and feeble minded adults I'm glad that adult oriented mainstream-ish cinema like The Master, Cosmopolis and Holy Motors manage to get made. Never mind receive media coverage and awards. It reassures me that there are people outside of my social circle who still like to be challenged sometimes by what they watch, read or listen to in their spare time.

Art has many roles and facets, of which 'to entertain' is just one. Not everything is supposed to be 'fun'. (Fun is totally frickin' addictively awesome though.)

And to anyone complaining that this post is 'too long': you were warned, nobody forced you to read it and it was free. It cost you nothing but five minutes of your fun fueled life. It wasn't even trying to sell you any products.

reply

You can bore me anytime. Well thought out provoking post to the above.

reply

It's one of the worst films i've ever seen. An utter waste of time.

reply