DiCaprio should've won an academy award for Wolf of Wall Street but was robbed by this Oscar bait crap no one even remembers. Thankfully, Leo got an award last night and it healed some of those wounds from 2014.
shareExcept McConaughey won Best Actor that year you dumb heathen.
http://jmoneyyourhoney.filmaf.com/owned
[deleted]
Disagree. What was the better movie that year?
shareWolf of Wall Street.
Troyaltrollwalker(Darth Spino)
What was the better movie that year?
Wolf of wallstreet was good and entertaining, but I prefer 12YAS. Also, I don't think you can confirm than "no on really cares about it".
shareWolf of Wall Street was good.
It would had been better if it was half the running time.
However 12 years did not rob DiCaprio.
It's that man again!!
So popularity defines quality.
share"...and the academy award for best actor goes to 12 Years a Slave!"
The Academy always did have a track record of *beep* up, but this is on a whole new level of incompetence.
"If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?"
Not at all. If you had paid attention to the awards Wolf of Wall Street and 12 Years a Slave got, you would know neither leading actor won best leading actor. So I think your beef should be with another movie.
*Duke
OP only rates movies 10 or 1. OP is therefore not qualified to judge anything. I urge the rest of you to be a little more thorough when dealing with one-dimensional fools (or trolls with too much time on their hands).
'OP only rates movies 10 or 1.'
It must be weird not being able to say after watching a movie: 'That was just average.'
It's that man again!!
[deleted]
Leo played a loud mouth money grubbing *beep* in WOWS. Sure he played it well but 12YAS was a far more moving film than watching some greedy money grubbing *beep* try to screw people over for 3 hours.
shareLeo played a loud mouth money grubbing *beep* in WOWS. Sure he played it well but 12YAS was a far more moving film than watching some greedy money grubbing *beep* try to screw people over for 3 hours.
Well I for one didn't love it, I thought it was tedious. After the umdeenth scene of them getting pissed, taking drugs, screwing hookers, and stealing from honest people all I could think was " geez enough already, I get it ". This film could have been at least an hour shorter as the source material was clearly limited.
Perhaps I'm a little bias as I found the characters in the film so repugnant. The Academy clearly thought so as well. As for Leo, yea he was fine but basically he just jumped about and acted like a jackass for 3 hours, 12 YAS by contrast had some truly masterful and emotional performances. On the flip side Leo's performance in The Revenant was truly masterful and full of emotion, it was for more deserving of and Oscar that WOWS.
Here is a suggestion : take 7 lemons , cut and squeeze all of those in a glass , add a little water to that and drink in one go.
That will cure your hangover quickly and then may be you can consider either making meaningful posts or trying better at trolling.
This attempt,no matter at which one,was pathetic.
I personally liked Wolfie better, but 12 Years is a better film.
share