3/27 another 20mil
better than predicted 18mil for another strong hold (drop of 44%). 332 domestic total now.
sharebetter than predicted 18mil for another strong hold (drop of 44%). 332 domestic total now.
shareWORLDWIDE
$677,765,195
Starting to slow down now. Might not hit a billion as expected.
Good numbers for a Twilight spinoff though.
I haven't seen Twilight or this movie, so I wouldn't know if it's a good spinoff. How would you know? Big Twilight fan? Done with your "second rewatching" yet? Why not just say 3rd time? Confused?
Oh wait, I see your other posts. It's hit-and-run day for you around here. See ya next week!
ok sounds good. I am stoked about the new Top Gun movie as well. early predictions has it making $1.2 billion.
shareLooks like Sparkle Batboy couldn't make a billion with the Batman brand that used to be guaranteed to make an easy billion.
shareOnly The Dark Knight Rises made a billion.
The Dark Knight (2008)
WORLDWIDE
$1,006,102,277
based on inflation, it would be 1.3 million today.
https://www.the-numbers.com/box-office-records/worldwide/all-movies/creative-types/super-hero
We can call it that since my source is just under. But the point remains, "guaranteed to make an easy billion" doesn't apply to the "Batman brand" -- even when paired with Superman. And be sure to factor in Covid in China as well as a 45-day theatrical window vs a 90-day window for this one. Oh, and it lost Russia as well.
Thats weird that 2 different sites have 2 different numbers. Wonder what their sources are? Anyways, The Batman will go on to make at least $750m or more, which aint bad honestly.
shareThe same happened with Batman Begins. Good start that will presell a sequel that will likely make more than this one -- unless Reeves completely craps the bed.
shareAlready at 710 with this weekend.
shareWORLDWIDE
$714,459,145
not bad numbers, but not as good as TDK.
estimated movie cost is 200 million and multiply by 2.5. = 450 million
estimated profit is $250 million
No, it was never TDK. That was a domestic phenomenon. But this one has done significantly better than Batman Begins, even while adjusting for inflation. And it will likely boost HBO Max as well. It's a clear winner for WarnerMedia all the way around.
shareTDK was a domestic juggernaut because it was a good movie. Batman Begins was an origin story and was never going to make a lot of money as everyone already knows his origin.
A similar comparison to The Batman would be TDK as they both have Batman already established as Batman.
Its a mediocre winner but still a good box office showing for Twilight Man. I think Batfleck would have been better suited for this movie anyways.
Actually, Batman Begins is the apt comparison b/c it was a first film with new actors and a different take from a different director. TDK was helped by the solid start it was given by Batman Begins. No one was unsure about Bale or Nolan or his vision after that. So, TDK was given a bigger budget b/c proof of concept was already provided by the first film, and that would undoubtedly help to pre-sell a sequel -- just like it did.
I suspect you will see the same for Reeves in a sequel. More expensive production, more latitude, b/c his Batman was well received critically and commercially --i.e., a sequel to a successful film will pre-sell more than any first film could. That's how it works. The next one will be Reeves' TDK.
Might be a while for the follow up. Nothing on Pattinsons acting docket yet.
Warner Bros. has not yet officially announced The Batman sequel. However, director Matt Reeves confirmed that plans are underway for The Batman 2.
In an interview with The Independent, Reeves said that he didn’t make The Batman with a sequel in mind but would like to tell more stories.
I'm sure a sequel was talked about soon after the reviews and that opening weekend. It will happen, even if by some unlikely chance Reeves has an extreme clash with WB about what he wants to do. They'll have their pick of directors if he drops out for some weird reason.
share