Seeing a lot of complains about Catwoman being black as expected from the usual suspects. Casting interracial couples is the future and here to stay and it is the right move going forward for Hollywood as it better represents America's demographics and how things will be in the future. Complaining about that exposes you as a racist. Don't do it.
shareDownsides of race mixing
1. Lower IQ of children (in the case of White woman choosing a Black man instead of a White man)
Not only will the IQ be lower due to the fact Blacks have lower IQ genetically, but the IQ of mullatto children will be lower even if you control for the IQ of parents due to regression to the mean. Meaning a child of a White women she has with a Black man with an IQ of 100 is still going to be lower than a child that same White woman had with a White man with an equal IQ of 100.
2. Higher incidence of domestic violence and divorce. Studies show mixed race couples are 1.5 times more likely to have domestic violence than same race couples. They are also more likely to get divorced.
3. Identity crisis. Mixed race children are more likely to develop identity crisis than monoracial children.
4. No ability to donate bone marrow in case of leukaemia. If a child of a mixed race couple has leukaemia NONE of the parents are genetically close to the child to be compatible for bone marrow transplant.
4. Destruction of races and thus diversity. It's interesting how liberals celebrate diversity yet support race mixing which destroys diversity. They cry each time an animal subspecies goes extinct, yet are silent when the White race is going extinct.
Race mixing is objectively bad for society. Keep living in your fantasy world, retard.
This is incredibly racist, thankfully your outdated views are being left behind in the dust by modern society.
shareModern society never "left behind" these views. It was just artificially indoctrinated to accept them by the leftist media, academia and most importantly entertainment industry, by not just promoting it, but by also covering up it's downsides. Interracial marriage is so wonderful that it takes 60 years of conditioning for society to accept it.
shareElSofoqueDos fuck modern society. Your SJW views are already outdated and being left behind, you guys are just too dumb to realize it yet.
shareWould one calculate the opposite if the White woman would choose an Eastasian man? ;)
share1. This is incorrect. Exhaustive testing has shown that the IQ of a child will be within 3 IQ points that of the mother. Exceptions are so rare theres less than one in a million chance. Altrough that could be highly increased through artificial insemination. Therefore white mother black father will retain the IQ of the mother.
2. This is cultural issue, not a racial one.
3. Agree.
4. Fair enough but is this really that common?
5. Diversity of race is such a tiny part of what actual diversity is....
1. Not true. Mixed race children have IQs almost perfectly in the middle of average IQ of both races. If Whites have an IQ of 100, Blacks 85, mixed race children will have an IQ of 93.
2. How do you know that for sure? There are plausible evolutionarily theories that strongly suggest aggressiveness, dominance, impulsivity and sensation seeking are selected for in warm climates.
5. Then why do leftist always complain about lack of racial diversity, and never about lack of other diversity? "Diversity" is a code word for Black people in leftist language.
1. Thats because theres both white and black mothers producing mixed race children.
2. Because when you take the cultura element away, for example new imigrees, the family issues normalize to standards levels.
5. because they are pants-on-head retarded.
1. Of course they do. But both combinations produce IQs that are average in between Blacks and Whites.
2. Even if higher violence in mixed race couples were the result of culture, it would still be a good argument against mixed race couples. There is no magic switch for culture. Black people have been in America for 400 years and they have different subculture. And the nature vs nurture argument has never been settled. The data suggests differences between Whites and Blacks are heavily genetic. At least IQ appears to be, but other psychological traits such as aggression and impulsiveness could be also since it makes sense evolutionarily. African and West Indian immigrants to America are a heavily selected and filtered group, the smartest one immigrate so they are not a representative sample
1. Thats just false. While the white mothers arent sending their best (they are marrying black men after all) the IQ disparity remains.
2. No, it would be a good argument against that culture. Not all cultures are good. Some should be suppressed.
There are genetic differences, but family violence is not one.
1. Totally wrong. Minnesota transracial adoptions study (along many others) prove interracial children have IQs right in the middle of both races.
2. Of course not all cultures are good. The biggest factors for evolution of culture are genetic predispositions. It's no coincidence Asians and Jews have a culture of learning and they also have high IQs. It's also no coincidence Blacks have a culture of sports, bling and gangsta rap.
There are very plausible evolutionary theories that explain high impulsivity and aggression among Black people.
Paternal investment theory suggests that in cold climates males were selected for provisioning, rather than for mating success. In warm climates, where female gathering made male provisioning unessential, selection was for mating success. Male hunted meat was essential for female winter survival. Genes that encouraged mating success were selected for in warm climates. Negroids (blacks) evolved in warm climates, while Caucasians (whites) and Mongoloids (Asians) evolved in colder climates. Mating is assisted by a strong sex drive, aggression, dominance, sociability, extraversion, impulsiveness, sensation seeking, and high testosterone. Provisioning is assisted by anxiety, altruism, empathy, behavioural restraint, gratification delay, and a long life span. Explanations are offered for racial differences in many personality characteristics, hormone levels, monamine oxidase levels, testosterone levels, lactase dehydrogenase metabolic paths, life spans, prostate cancer rates, hypertension, genital (penis and testes) size, vocal frequencies, liver size, muscle structure, mesomorphy, bone density, sports performance, crime rates, rape, child abuse, earnings, age at first sexual activity, AIDs, illegitimacy, divorce, marriage, and polygyny rates. Eye colour correlations are discussed. Negro family structure in the Caribbean and the U.S. may reflect selection in Africa during hunter-gather times. Comparison is made with differential K theory and father absence theories.
Lol. Yeah ok.
When people stop obsessing about race, on both sides, we'll all be better off. Stop talking about it and racists lose their fuel .
shareOn both sides? That's all liberals talk about is race. Or everything is racist. Guess to some is normal that every ad now is mixed race or having to be a woman or black and a black woman. Watch the commercials black wife and children and a white guy. I could care less love is love but don't push it like what's happening to trans. Your gay...who cares but quit having to tell the world your gay or whatever. And quit talking with a lisp, you weren't born the way. Super
shareYes, both sides. I wish liberals and racists alike would STFU regarding race If racists wouldn't whine so much when they see mixed race couples or black people as superheros, liberals wouldn't get satisfaction from pushing their buttons in doing so, at least in a forced way. Whatever. It's said better by Morgan Freeman.
shareI see you take to the Morgan Freeman philosophy.
shareInterracial people and families are actually the past and the now, but I get that you're addressing an audience who's living in some (what like 1970s?) mind frame or something
shareAgree on your main point, but black people are only 13% of the US population and they were 3 of the 4 main "good" characters in this movie. So it really isn't representative at all. If this was really supposed to be representative of the US population, Catwoman should have been Hispanic. Or white, or Asian. Not black. That was being forced fed to us.
shareCatwoman in this movie isn't exactly black tho'. She's definitely mixed-race.
shareYet you go on other movie boards and whine about Wokeness because "mixed racial couples".
shareElSofoqueDos Dude, please. Don't come at us with that cliche woke jargon crap, nobody is saying interracial couples are a bad thing, but the truth is we don't need to see it in every damn movie these days. What difference does it make if they're interracial or not? That shouldn't be the point, casting the right actor for the part is the point and their skin color shouldn't be a factor into it. Nobody gives a shit. "better represents America's demographics"....blah, blah, blah, once again, who gives a shit? Movies are for entertainment, not social politics. This is why most movies are pieces of shit now because they're not making films anymore, they're just making woke propaganda and it doesn't work..... and everyone is tired of it.
share