Did Woody respond to Arquette documentary?

Wow. You were this close to being normal and then you ruined it.

and for the fifth time now YOU ASKED THE QUESTION YOU F@#*#NG LUNATIC!

for what it is worth...
(ie naught)
mothnm finally makes good, solid post. then ruins it with "the others are scary"ness.

then, chrysalis calls the OP on it and ask for a ref. well said. BUT then goes on to reply to self and re-state the argument, aided by expletives. and how about throwing a dig at people with mental disorders as an appetizer. it only weakens your argument. (ps, you reply to yourself. not a *great* sign.)

chrys: how many times has calling a "lunatic" a "lunatic" actually resulted in something positive?
by the 3rd reply to your own self, you have demonstrated a number of things. if, as you say, you "DONT CARE" and "LET IT GO" i highly doubt you even would re-visit this thread. but you do.

moth: i am not defending you in the least, ms/mr antagonist. you know exactly what you are poking. i am not saying some of your ideas are without merit, but i think you know it is all about the approach.

and to you, you know who i mean, when your writing style and MO remain the same, some of us know it is you.

thank the lords and gods that somebody can see the comedy in this.
and plus ten points to anyone who can quote and knows that "no one can eat fifty eggs"


peace