Digital garbage
Shame this is shot on digital and not film. Deakins is pissing on his legacy.
sharePiss off with that
share
MovieChat Forums > Blade Runner 2049 (2017) Discussion > Digital garbage
You understand that same directed with same cinematographer used same camera, ratio in movies like Prisoners and Sicario?
You claiming right now that final product Prisoners and Sicario looked bad.
Both of those movies were overrated (poor pretending to be good)
shareI was having the same argument with a friend of mine, and he reasoned that digital can be made to look like film. I still don't know if I concur with that as everything that Deakins has shot has been very clean looking. It's great cinematography, but very clean.
shareWhat does clean mean? When was film "dirty"?
shareNo texture to it because there is no grain. It looks too flat, too artificial, too clean. it has no texture at all.
shareYou are correct in that it has no texture however it's not because of lack of grain. There is film stock that doesn't show any grain yet it has texture because this is a matter of resolution. Digital is shít and will never have the resolution of film because the grain that gets burned by light is MICROSCOPIC. No matter how big the digital sensors get, they can make them the size of Canada for all I care, they will always be shít.
shareYep. With Deakins it pretty much looks the same. No Country and Sicario look no different in my eyes.
shareDeakins Used Digital on Skyfall, Prisoners and Sicario and they all looked amazing
shareDeakins? I'm in then!
Whatever you are, be a good one.