I don't merely "think" they're "so great," I know they are, which is why I'm still using one as my main PC monitor. When I first had to replace the electrolytic capacitors in this monitor several years ago it was out of commission for about a week while I waited for the new capacitors to arrive, and I bought a new LCD monitor to use during that time. I hated every minute of using it. I still have it in storage; it's only been used for a week.
The reason they aren't made anymore is obvious. Cheapness and the lowest common denominator always prevail in the consumer marketplace. From the perspective of the manufacturers, it costs them far less to make an LCD than a CRT, so that drastically increases their profits. From the lowest common denominator consumers' perspective, they aren't known for having a sense of, and/or placing much value on, performance, which is why Blu-rays have never outsold DVDs even though Blu-ray has been around for almost 19 years.
And there are some indisputable advantages of LCDs over CRTs, such as lower power consumption, being smaller/lighter for a given screen size, and being practical to make in very large screen sizes (the biggest CRT TV ever made was 43", and it weighed 450 pounds). Those things are irrelevant for computer monitors though, which don't need to be huge, and the extra power consumption (which is only about 100 watts) is negligible compared to the amount of power that an interstellar spaceship would have available.
reply
share