MovieChat Forums > Apollo 18 (2011) Discussion > The Deputy Secretary of Defense was Evil...

The Deputy Secretary of Defense was Evil!


I know it's only a movie, but let's take a look at the situation from a rational standpoint. So the so-called mission of Apollo 18 was for the men to plant sensors on the moon to track the rock monsters, I guess? NASA could have easily accomplished that with an unmanned probe. Even in 1974 they would've had the means to do that. They wouldn't risk the lives of three perfectly good astronauts. NASA cares about their astronauts. Remember Apollo 13? They did everything in their power and more to get those men home. They didn't just leave them for dead.
Now on to the DSOD, when Anderson finally gets ahold of him, he basically tells the man, "yeah, we know everything, and you're pretty much screwed. But we'll tell your family you died a hero." And "the decision's final. Sorry, Ben." What a douchebag. If contamination was the risk, they could arrange to have him quarantined the second he returned to Earth, or, since they were so aware of the situation, judging by Walker's condition, he could informed Anderson he wouldn't survive the trip home and he'd run the risk of infecting Grey. Oh, and speaking of Grey, when he attempts to rescue his colleague, the Deputy threatens to cut off communication if he doesn't abort. It's like human life meant NOTHING to that guy. He was the real villain of the film, not those freakin' rock monsters, which was a ridiculous concept, but that's another rant.

That guy must have been appointed by Nixon. I love how found-footage movies like this and Quarantine make government officials out to be total monsters. In both movies, people are entrapped in a dark environment with a monster on the loose and are being held against their will by evil government officials. So both movies ask the question, "who's the truly evil one here? The humans with too much power, or the inhuman creature that's killing people?"

Anyway, bottom line, the Deputy Secretary was a dick, and I hope somebody gave him a moon rock as a souvenir.


reply

[deleted]

Basically, the DoD had no idea what they were dealing with, I think.

They knew SOMETHING was down there.

It might seem sadistic, but they were just thinking about what might happen if it ended up on Earth, which I can understand. They may not of wanted to do it, but they were just thinking big picture.

I still don't see NASA abandoning their astronauts.

reply

[deleted]

Then perhaps he could have put it to Anderson THAT way, not just say to him, "you're outta luck, pal."

reply

[deleted]

They shouldn't have sent men to the moon in the first place if they knew about these monsters. Also, here's an interesting point, why only now (1974) do they show up? How come Apollos 11-17 never encountered them? The movie never really addressed that, they just said that after Apollo 17 in 1972, they canceled all remaining Apollo missions for mysterious reasons.

That aside, the concept of moon rock monsters was ridiculous. What a missed opportunity this movie was. The monster could've been ANYTHING, and should've been left unseen until the end. That reminds me of an episode of Night Gallery, in which astronauts go to the moon and encounter a giant monster. The bulk of the episode is ground control communicating with the astronauts about identifying the monster and how to solve the situation. Toward the end, we find out the "monster" is just a giant mouse, and so the astronauts build a giant mousetrap. Up until THAT point, the episode had wonderful tension and kept us wondering.
Tiny rock monsters that give you some advanced form of rabies? Come on!

So... I guess the point is we weren't meant to take ANYTHING in this movie seriously? It's completely removed from reality, it goes against all logic and everything we hold true. It was almost like a.... a 1950s sci-fi B-movie. Is that what they were going for? A found-footage '50s sci-fi B-Movie.

reply

[deleted]

Are you kidding me? Where the *beep* have you obtained this idea that the US military has a history of lovable ethics when considering the expendibility its personnel? MKULTRA is maybe the most famous but there have been tons of unethical experiments conducted on soldiers and civilians.

Some of them are catalogued here but you can do your own research in the unlikely event you actually care: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States

reply