Just as an example, the Germans nearly beat the allies to the development of the atomic bomb.
That was never close to being true.
Richard Rhodes, in his excellent history of the development of the atomic bomb, showed that at all stages of development, the US Manhattan project was head and shoulders more advanced than the German effort.
Partly due to a large and undamaged industrial base devoted to the effort and party due to the amazing intellectual resources made available to the US effort by the world's finest scientists being chased out of Nazi Europe by their campaign against "jewish" science.
They hadn't even achieved a self-sustaining chain reaction by war's end.
It wasn't for lack of trying. Heisenberg, appointed leader of the atomic effort by the Reich, a Nobel prize winning quantum theorist, was committed to the effort (whatever apologists say now). But, he was no nuclear physicist nor was he an experimentalist. And, he was surrounded by the political hacks of no great talent or insight left in place by Nazi policies at German universities.
Also, as the war progressed and pressure grew on the Nazi state, those resources that might've been spent on the atom bomb project were siphoned off for other efforts: V2 rockets, jet fighters, keeping the trains loaded full of victims for the death camps.
reply
share