MovieChat Forums > Bron/Broen (2011) Discussion > Who is the killer(s) season 3?

Who is the killer(s) season 3?


Yet I'm not sure at the motive, but I think it may be Henrik's wife who's gone. I think she took the kids with her the years back because he had drug problems or something. She found a new man a now they're doing the killings together, maybe. Would explain why we sometimes see the figure of a woman (when Hans was taken and the man was shot) and sometimes of a man (when the priest-man was killed we saw the figure in the car).
They've time for it, and most of the characters in this season is somehow connected to drugs/addiction, and she's already connected in a way.
I feel like maybe it's not all time Henrik hallucinates. If she needs information she can just go ask him. We've already seen her ask questions related to the investigation as far as I remember, so why not.
And talk about the first kill. It was a family. Two kids (their kids?), a man (Henrik?) and a woman (her?). They're all smiling, but she is heartless. Could this symbolize her being "heartless"? And that they have a doll family?
I think somehow they are all connected to drugs, and that she was the one who made sure the Danish woman in the first episode got hurt so that she couldn't handle the case, and she said to Henrik while he thought he was hallucinating, that he should take the case. That's why he was desperate to take it in the first place.
I might be wrong, but so much are pointing on it. It's also just a little theory. I think it could happen. It would be shocking and a plot twist honestly. It would also make sense since she's Danish and the "beat the cat out of the barrel"-thing is a Danish tradition, and the killer used it so he/she might be Danish.

If she's not the killer, I think it's still a woman and a man. I think it's going to be Lise and some other dude as I think she couldn't have done it all by herself. Also, she's Danish too, she's involved, she is no longer in center and not a suspect from the police's side, and it's like it's what they want us to think, that she's over. Then she'll come back to surprise us.
Yeah, just a theory too. Hope someone can agree or find it interesting.

reply

This is an interesting theory. I agree that it doesn't seem the writers introduced the missing wife and children storyline just so that Saga can solve the case. There must be something more complex at play.

I also noticed that Lise and her shady husband disappeared from the series. This might have been a red herring though, like at the beginning we were supposed to believe the killer was after the people she criticized in her blogs, but Lise seems to have no connection to the third victim (the paedophile).

reply

Exactly.

That's also why I'm more to Henrik's wife as the killer, but Lise could always have a secret connection to the pedophile that we'll first know about in the last episode.

reply

I'm leaning towards the crazy stalker. But on the other hand, she might also just be a red herring. I doubt Lise is coming back into the plot. But it's definietly connected somehow to Claes and the big rich dude. His wife also got crazy eyes sometimes.

reply

The priest was not part of the killings (no burnmark) and they caught the guy who killed him. Lises shady husband was back this week, since most of the stuff used in the killings were bought through his company. So keep guessing ;-)

Athhajar ma yeroon.

reply

Well it don't exclude Lise or Henrik's wife.

reply

I think the drug problem started later, to forget his grief over his missing family.
I don't know if it is a bit to farfetch but strange that his family is missing and Sagas mother get's killed, maybe a small part of the plot.

reply

Really like the season so far, but
1) Please don't let it be the 3rd killbrother who supposedly committed suicide years ago, but magically staged his own death only toe reappear now and kill other people (together with his new friend)
2) I know it's fiction and all, but the absurd coincidence of that gambling prick stealing the ipad of the killer was an insult to the viewer.

reply