Stephen King, I'm willing to bet, deep down inside and away from the paparazzi, HATES the decision-making behind this film, but can't say so b/c it will make him look like a racist douche. You ALL know this is true.
Yeah, if King said anything remotely negative about the casting the media would have a field day. They'd be counting how many times he has used the n-word in his books, how many and what kind of black characters he has had and by the end of the week he'd be a full blown racist.
Sure, he might actually approve and be fine with it, but he's not going to say otherwise even if he doesn't like it.
Then why didn't he say something while the decisions were still being made? They were happening long before any news was released to the public, and King was involved in this project from the start. He could have easily said that he wanted to keep the racial dynamics of the ka-tet as it is in the books and have the casting reflect that, which would have been a perfectly reasonable request to make, and there would have been nothing at all racist about it.
--- It's the question that drives us. I know the answer is 42.
As someone who's more than familiar with how certain segments of the media react to real or perceived racism from public figures, I very highly doubt it. As I said, it would have been a perfectly reasonable request for him to make while they were still discussing possible actors for the role and Elba was first brought up. He could have said no, explaining that he considered the racial dynamic between Roland and Susannah to be an important part of the story - there would have been nothing racist about that, to the contrary even.
--- It's the question that drives us. I know the answer is 42.
King has a long history of being pretty anal when it comes to the faithfulness of adaptations of his books. You look at any that he's wrote the script for and they're usually word for word or near enough. His favourite adaptations, like those by Frank Darabont, tend to be very close. I doubt that he's breaking with that trend now and is suddenly okay with casting that's miles away from the character he wrote.
While all things are possible in an infinite universe... I doubt this is the case. He's been actively singing the praises of the casting choice. If he wasn't happy with it, he could have just acknowledged it and said nothing more or refused to comment at all. I think he's pleased enough with the choice and the reasons that have been given to him for it.
Stephen King, I'm willing to bet, deep down inside and away from the paparazzi, HATES the decision-making behind this film, but can't say so b/c it will make him look like a racist douche. You ALL know this is true.
He didn't have to send out the initial supportive tweet and he didn't have to double down on his support with an interview with Entertainment Weekly. King doesn't share your opinion, and that's OK. You are free to have a different opinion than King. You are the one who is having trouble processing this. You need to have some microchip replaced in your RoboCop suit, because you are spouting off a lot of invective and unsubstantiated nonsense in this and other threads. As Anakin_McFly has pointed out elsewhere, King could have said no well before any information about Elba came out. He has a seat at the table and has a voice.
You are free to disagree with King. You are free to hate the casting choices. You are free to hate the movie. Please do not sink into the delusion that others whom you admire have to hold your own views for you to find solace in your grief on this project. I am sorry for your loss.
reply share
All king said in the tweet was that the gunslinger's race was unimportant. There are other problems with this decision. I see Elba's casting as not too different from the casting of a young Arnie or Bruce Willis. He's got the build of an action hero. All the controversy over race is blinding people to these other issues.
It wouldn't surprise me. King in the past has been very outspoken about adaptions which change a lot so him being ok with a casting that changes the story that much just doesn't fit. And if he had said anything against it within minutes there would be no shortage of idiots claiming he was racist.
That or he's just become a yes man now, as that would also explain how the Under the Dome tv show was ever allowed to be made like that.
It wouldn't surprise me. King in the past has been very outspoken about adaptions which change a lot so him being ok with a casting that changes the story that much just doesn't fit. And if he had said anything against it within minutes there would be no shortage of idiots claiming he was racist.
Back at square one. Yes, if he had sent out a tweet that explained however eloquently (in 140 characters or fewer) that he would prefer Roland to be played by a white actor he would most definitely have received flack for it. (I wouldn't have cared, it's his vision and it's a great series.) However, he would never have been forced into such a position from the outset. He has a seat at the table and could have expressed any potential displeasure before the news was released. Even if his potential displeasure had been overruled he would not have had to send out the tweet in support. Even if somehow (as some claim) King felt that his hand was forced and that he had to send out the positive tweet or be considered a closet racist, he didn't have to sit for an subsequent interview with Entertainment Weekly in which he praises Elba. He could at that point have declined an interview on the subject, spoke in more general terms, or change the subject. Furthermore, King has has no issue expressing his progressive views on various aspects of politics, media, and society at large. The logical conclusion to draw from this is that King likes Elba in the role, or at the very least that he doesn't mind Elba in the role.
King disagrees with you on this subject, and that's OK. You can leave it there. He doesn't have to hold your exact opinion on casting for you to enjoy the books, and it is perfectly fine if you don't like the film or choose not to support it. You can speak out about it is much as you want, hate the course of the production all you need, but King doesn't need to agree with you. His difference of opinion should not throw a wrench in your plans to boycott the film, and if his approval of your position is what you need to feel that your opinion is justified--you are not going to get that.
That or he's just become a yes man now, as that would also explain how the Under the Dome tv show was ever allowed to be made like that.
That's not quite what a yes man is, but yes, he is complicit in the mediocrity that is the TV adaptation of Under the Dome. King does not have the best judgment in adaptations of his own material, and you are completely justified in having concerns about the quality of this or other projects for the same reason. I hold out hope, but there are plenty of good reasons why that hope may or may not dissipate in the coming months. I'll still watch it on day one even if I feel that it might become a Patricia the Mono.
reply share