Did you agree with King later revising the first novel to have Roland kill Allie as an expression of mercy, or do you prefer him slaying his lover out of pure ingrained reflex?
---
It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
Reflex.
I love King's descriptions about how Roland's hands did their own thing when it was killing time.
Strongly agree with the above poster. Was very disappointed in that revision, glad I have a copy before they made the change.
shareI prefer the revised version. It doesn't make sense to me that Roland, with all his skill, would unintentionally shoot anyone.
shareDitto. I get that Roland killing someone he cared for while they're clearly visible and out in the open is dramatic/sad, but it doesn't line up with the man's experience handling his iconic revolvers up to that point.
---
It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
Ditto. I get that Roland killing someone he cared for while they're clearly visible and out in the open is dramatic/sad, but it doesn't line up with the man's experience handling his iconic revolvers up to that point.
Bump.
---
It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
Reflex. I never quite liked the over-emphasis on "nineteen" in the last three books as well as the revised Gunslinger, and while it was a creepy addition, I think that early Roland works best when he has no room for mercy. Mercy is what he learns through the course of his journey with the ka-tet.
Jonathan, getting frustrated by me!
By the way? In the comics, Roland ends up deliberately shooting Allie.
---
It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
[deleted]
[deleted]