Odetta Susannah Holmes is a FICTIONAL character, her hate extends only as far as her creator, Stephen King, allows it.
I don't think this is at issue. I can only speak in an interpretive literary approach, insofar as hermeneutic retrospection allows me in the case of race reversal. Supplanting King's original description with a black Roland, I can only say that her characterization holds steady.
Yes she did have some animosity toward her aunt due to Odetta accidentally breaking the blue forspecial plate. Yes, much of her trepidation and anger as Detta comes from the fact that she views Roland as dangerous. It also stems from the fact that he is....WHITE. Detta has a built in hatred of all whites, specifically men.
I won't discount that her perception if race is not a factor, merely that it is not the extent of her character. She as described as more of a caricature (hardly grounds for being considered a dynamic character), and her vitriol extends beyond general bigotry. When taken in context of her dual personality (prior to the introduction of Susannah), the pair fears Roland more than Eddie, and this is due entirely to her/their perception of Roland from a non-racial perspective. Odetta on the surface has more cause to fear whites having undergone myriad humiliations and degradation in Oxford town and elsewhere. When combined into Susannah, the racial fear disappears. All is well. Fear is gone, and Detta is only called upon for her strength. Her strength is not described in racial terms, but rather in terms that best describe a hateful person. Why does the racial fear suddenly disappear? Is this something one observes in real people, such a complete turnaround? Why does it never come up again except in flourishes of character (never in a discriminatory way)? Is it lazy writing? Is it fast-tracking a character for future utility? Or is it, the more likely case, that her racism is not the most important aspect of her character?
Detta is fairly consistent but she is not the flat character that you make her out to be, because she isn't a separate character. Shies an extension of Odetta's subconscious due to the era in which she grew up and the two accidents that irrevocably changed her life forever (the guy that dropped the brick on her head and pushed her in front of the train). Detta was an extension of Odetta thereby making her a fairly rounded character.
You can remove her and find her to be flat or see her as a person with a split personality and find her more well-rounded, but either way her perception of race does not define her. Both of these characters have had to live through the rampant racism of the 1930s-1960s, but locating Detta's specific issues to those of race is limiting. She is more than just a bigot, she is a vicious misanthrope. She hates in general. Your characterization of Detta would make her an even less dynamic character, by limiting her rage to race specifically.
The racism is a big enough part of Odetta/Detta/Susannah that people are upset that it may be watered down or excluded. That is why there is so much turmoil over the casting decisions that have been made thus far.
It need not go away entirely. Eddie is still a component of the story. She could direct racial epithets at him while retaining other possible judgments for Roland. It could actually make the character more multifaceted in her verbiage and vitriol.
Even if Roland, Detta, and Eddie were all black it doesn't change the core dynamic--Detta hates. Detta will find any outlet with which to spit her venom.
Think about all of the attempts Roland and Eddie try to make to assuage her fears about poisoning (or raping or assaulting) her. She has a handy excuse for everything they say. I cannot believe that her canny character would just suddenly be OK with her new situation, regardless of the racial breakdown of the characters. Detta's defense mechanism is pure, unmitigated, unadulterated hatred.
reply
share