This is a thread made in all seriousness. Do you believe in Jake's proclamation that "There are other worlds than these?" Do you believe in the truth (within the series at least) that there are multiple universes and multiple worlds and multiple levels to the Dark Tower, and as such different versions of each character we encounter throughout the series?
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus. --Sayid
That is true in the series but if they aren't going to make the Dark Tower into films as they should be they shouldn't have bothered. Nobody wants a pathetic cheap version just because the filmmakers are clueless and lack even the most basic knowledge of the books.
Why make *beep* fanfiction (at best, although clearly no one involved in this is a fan), when they could do it right and at least attempt to actually adapt the books?
So for you taking elements from the books and rearranging them - within a framework that is stated to have multiple layers and levels anyway - is not a proper adaptation and just simply becomes fanfiction.
Okay, what about the MCU films, or LOTR, or the Bourne movies?
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus. --Sayid
Films based on comics are different, there are multiple versions of comic characters. But there is only one Dark Tower book series. I'm curious how much they could change before you'd see it as a bad thing. Apparently changes to the lead character and wholesale changes to the story are no problem. If they performed more race changes or more story changes would you still be all for it then?
Films based on comics are different, there are multiple versions of comic characters.
Given that 1) there are multiple versions of the main characters that we see WITHIN THE STORY and 2) that Stephen King is hugely influenced by comic books (and the stories have their own comic book counterparts) I would say this is a pretty weak argument.
Apparently changes to the lead character and wholesale changes to the story are no problem.
Physical changes, no I have no problem with. As long as the core of the character remains intact and that really remains to be seen until the film is released, which is my main point this whole time - don't demonize the film until you have seen it.
As well as changes to the story, if the changes make sense in a cinematic sense, if they are still elements of the story, just told in a different way, if the changes aren't being made just for the sake of change, and if this story is supposed to be set as a continuation to the book series and not a 1:1 adaptation, then I am willing to give the film a chance.
If it sucks I'll be one of the first to cry foul. But I'm at least going to watch the movie first before I tear it down.
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus. --Sayid
reply share
But they are making changes just for the sake of change in this. There's no good reason to change Roland's race (their infact big story reasons not to), there's no good reason to ignore the entire story of the Gunslinger and every book onward if they continued after (as if that's going to happen). There's no good reason to include villains who shouldn't make an appearence till much later, the relocation of most of the action to a cheaper setting or making Roland Jake's sidekick.
At this point they've basically changed everything but a few names and you would actually accept more? Why even call it the Dark Tower anymore if they are just changing everything?
There's no good reason to include villains who shouldn't make an appearence till much later
Unless of course you're starting a new story cycle, which begins after the end of the books, and starts from a point where Roland has the Horn of Eld like how book VII ended...
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus. --Sayid
reply share
No that is being used as an excuse to pathetically try to justify massive changes, it doesn't actually justify it. And the fact is that nobody had the reaction when this was first announced of "oh I hope they ignore almost everything and make it a new cycle", because nobody wanted that. There are some people so determined to see anything with the Dark Tower name on it on film that they have convinced themselves this cheap poorly cast hack job is anything but a bad way to do it.
You keep spinning the same tune, Spides. You act as if you're an authority on the book, and that every fan should want a 1:1 adaptation because that's what you want. If you're such a big fan, would you care to discuss your favorite characters, quotes, etc in one of the two more lighthearded threads I've started and join in a more friendly conversation? Maybe bond with other fans over favorite moments and characters?
Because to be honest you beating the drum with the same tired arguments is getting pretty boring..
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus. --Sayid
Just ignore him. Everyone has gone round and round, some of us even pointing out his own hypocrisy, yet he is deterrmined to be a Negative Nancy. He refuses to acknowledge others just want a good movie, despite massive changes (which harldy spells disaster--just compare Who Framed Roger Rabbit to its source material as once such example). He has also made baseless accusations against several people, often ignoring evidence to he contrary.
-- Listen to them—the children of the night. What music they make!
You keep spinning the same tune, Spides. You act as if you're an authority on the book, and that every fan should want a 1:1 adaptation because that's what you want.
This. Exactly.
If you're such a big fan, would you care to discuss your favorite characters, quotes, etc in one of the two more lighthearded threads I've started and join in a more friendly conversation? Maybe bond with other fans over favorite moments and characters?
I dont think there is any coming back for Spider... He is too far gone to join in any lightheartedness here. Plus, wouldn't be super weird to read something positive from him?
LOL - admittedly, it would be pretty weird. But it would also be a welcome change of pace IMO, instead of the endless negativity we're all used to from him.
I'd bet money that when the film was announced, before any casting. That not a single reader thought "Great, they definitely need to make Roland black... And I hope they completely ignore the story of the books". I don't enter discussions with people who would blindly praise anything, no matter how low the quality. Simply because it has some book names slapped on it. Or people who are so blatantly hypocritical about changing the race of characters that the repeated denials border on delusion.
And if people like you really wanted discussion of any kind you wouldn't respond to every criticism by anyone who dares to criticise with snide comments and insults.
That is true in the series but if they aren't going to make the Dark Tower into films exactly as I want them to they shouldn't have bothered. I don't wants [sic] a(n) awesome version that happens to have a black actor as Roland just because the filmmakers are *beep* but I am a racist so I'll keep complaining away while I sit here in my Aunt's Garage.
The man in black fled across the desert and the gunslinger followed.
It's funny how, when you use actual logic and a well-thought out argument, Spider never responds. I've had I don't know how many response threads where I made a great point, never to have Spider respond...
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus. --Sayid
I just want to say, I put spider on my ignore list a while back and has been so worth it. Every time he "contributes" to the conversation, imdb replaces his ignorance with "you have ignored this user", and it puts huge smile on my face. I think it would be great if everyone did the same. Let him argue with himself while we all enjoy our lives.
Aye, I'll not make the mistake of taking anything Spider has to say seriously any time soon. By now his posts are mere entertainment to me. I do so enjoy laying out a logic trap though. Thankee-sai. Long days and pleasent nights to you Sai brett...
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus. --Sayid
No. That was not what you should be thinking. There was nothing you read in the series that should make you think that Roland should be black. You should be thinking that the series was about the idea of the collective unconscious, not literal truth. The idea was that everything could be in the dark tower from fiction, or whatever. The idea was that the big concepts and ideas are somehow innate, as in the original Star Wars movie, Firefly, the Matrix, etc.... We all just somehow know there is something somehow sublime about certain moments. It speaks to us on a deeper level.
King, the character, was channelling the story, as were other authors of pop culture fiction, this is why different characters started showing up, then eventually outright concepts and creations from elsewhere... Then the whole cyclic b.s. if you read the afterword you would understand was a COP OUT. He was in over his head and couldn't write a way out, so he went with his gut and ended with the same line a la George Lucas Episode 1. It's all cyclic, man.
You can't use B.S. and a lack of thinking to argue for a black Roland and a total disregard for the source material.