Why should he be?
Well admittedly, the OP's comments are suspect at best. First, because "SJW casting" is the first and only reason the OP believes Elba was chosen, as opposed to "the filmmakers like him," or "he was on the filmmakers' shortlist for the role," or "he must've had the best audition," or "they want to take advantage of his rising star status," or "he's a good actor," etc.
And second, because in my experience, the terms "SJW," "PC," "pandering," and the like tend to be thrown about only during discussions involving marginalized groups, mainly 1) POC (people of color), 2) the LGBTQ community, or 3) women. I'm sure you can guess which category this discussion falls into.
So, the fact that the OP - and several others, for that matter - immediately latched onto "SJW casting" as the sole reason Elba was cast is pretty telling.
In this case, it would be in the interest of SJW's to cast any prominent white hero as black. Do you see the connection?
In this case, not really. It's also in the interest of people who like to make money - specifically, the filmmakers and the studio backing them - to cast people who are popular or gaining popularity and are (or have the potential to be) financially profitable. Given the time, money, talent, and overall risk involved in this project, I think it's pretty safe to say that there's no huge conspiracy to earn socio-political brownie points under the guise of a Stephen King property.
reply
share