There's another post on this board talking about the Palaver Podcast. So I started listening to it. There was one piece of info I came across that kind of defeats a LOT of Spider's arguments. He keeps saying Arcel is a "hack" director who "obviously" hasn't read the book. And then dismisses when we bring up articles that state he used the writings of Stephen King (The Dark Tower in particular) to learn English. He says all this because he cast Elba as Roland, ignoring the obvious melanin difference between the two.
And the real funny thing is, the podcast where they discuss the fact that Arcel learned English from Stephen King books, is from LOOOONG before they even started casting, it was posted in November of 2015. This, and McCaunahey was cast as The Man in Black long before Idris Elba was cast as Roland.
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus. --Sayid
Well his English is sh*t then because anyone who read the book wouldn't have cast Elba as Roland, it's terrible casting that ignores any written word on the character. Arcel is clearly a complete moron if he actually read the books and somewhere in his pea sized brain he saw Elba as Roland.
I hardly think he read the books and thought, Idris Elba would be great for this. More likely a casting director suggested Elba - or possibly even showed him a sizzle reel of his work - and then the idea occurred "Roland may be written as white but this guy could really pull it off."
Look I know your opinion of Elba's work but just because you think he's bad doesn't make it a fact. That's just your opinion. Some people - directors and writers included - think he's an excellent actor and are willing to take a chance with him as an iconic character. And we won't really know how it all comes off... Say it with me... Until the movie is released.
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus. --Sayid
He's a bland actor who plays basically the same part in everything. And the fact is if a character is described as white, constantly referred to as 'long tall and ugly'. Also repeatedly said to resemble Clint Eastwood as he looked in his westerns and the actor cast is black and built like a football player... It's just obviously terrible casting.
Because character is all about appearance and not their actions or their inner content. Roland's character has absolutely nothing to do with his quest, his obsession over the Dark Tower, his nobility as a Gunslinger. Is that what you're saying here?
I mean, I just want to understand where you stand on this...
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus. --Sayid
Part of what makes a character popular in any medium is how they're described or shown, depending on the medium. In books the most popular characters you'll find are well described because that helps the readers to see the character at least somewhat how the author intended. To complete ignore that when it comes to casting in an adaption is just idiotic.
There's a difference between ignoring a character's description, and looking past it when the right actor - someone who can convey the character's inner qualities which I happen to feel are more important than looks - comes along. Now hear me true. I'm not blindly defending this film as you claim, and I'm not so desparate to see a Dark Tower adaptation that I'll just accept anything that comes along. I will be going into this movie with a very critical eye and I'll be the first to cry off if they don't get it right. And by get it right I mean being true to the source material even if they change things. I happen to believe there's a middle ground where changes are acceptable if done in the spirit of the source material; you seem to deal in absolutes - it's either a direct adaptation or it's fan fiction or crap.
That's what infuriates me about you, Spider, this unmoving attitude you have that your point if view is fact and that everyone should think the way you do. Your outlook is just that - YOUR outlook, YOUR opinion. Not fact, it's just the way you see things, and you can't handle that others don't see things the way you do so you lash out with name-calling and reporting posts and accusations of hypocrisy. Yes, I have responded to some of what you say with sarcasm or even snideness. But at least I'm keeping an open mind, at least I'm thinking for myself. And I refuse to judge a movie - any movie - or book or story or whatever until I've seen it for myself and judged it true, based on what's there and not what I expect or think will be there. And therein lies the difference, is that you're willing to close yourself off and make judgements without the benefit of actually experiencing it first. It's a very closed-off and to me terrible way to live. Mainly because you're shutting yourself away from experiences, even bad ones. But that also means you might miss out on good experiences, constantly being negative and saying no to something just because you don't agree with a casting choice or an opposing point of view. Really, when I think about it I feel sorry for you.
Also, it would be interesting for you to show some knowledge of the books beyond Roland's descriptions. Seems pretty suspect to me that you haven't cited anything about the books other than physical descriptions of Roland and the racial tension in Drawing of the Three...
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus. --Sayid
Maximus, you give an excellent breakdown of why you, I and many others are okay with the casting. But Spider won't respond to reasonable arguments. As I've shown, the only things he responds to is asinine trolling. I know, I apologize to everyone else for my doing that. But it really, really shows his blindness to reasoned argument. All he wants to do is complain.
The man in black fled across the desert and the gunslinger followed.
Don't worry: this is a guy who wished financial ruination on people involved in the production of this film. Later, he doubled down and further stated that bodily harm ought to come to the principle actor and people involved in the production.
You're the worst example for evading questions, all you do is evade questions and derail topics when you have no reply. You are so full of sh*t it's ridiculous and reading your posts where you ramble on about how you don't care about a character's race blah blah, it couldn't possibly come off as more fake.
More topic avoidance Wesker, that is nothing like what this thread started it you just have nothing to add so have to completely change the subject. You're pathetic.
Because you never deliver a response that is worthwhile Wesker. You're so full of sh*t it's ridiculous. You prattle on and on about how race isn't important, making your snide comments and petty insults towards anyone who doesn't fall into line behind your thinking. All the while you are complaining about race change when it it comes to any characters that's not white. You even travel to other boards where you sense people actually wanting good casting to defend other race changes that are being insulted. As long as those race changes aren't to a black character of course. You are a sad pathetic little social justice warrior with no substance to back your rhetoric.
And when you run out of argument in return to anyone's posts you derail the topics or try to change the subject. It's transparent and you
Looks like you didn't finish your post there. However, this stuck out:
...making your snide comments and petty insults towards anyone who doesn't fall into line behind your thinking.
Not only does this seem to be inaccurate regarding the poster you're referring to, but...this. This right here. Coming from you. The guy who likes to toss a plethora of insults at anyone who doesn't absolutely loathe this upcoming movie and/or Idris Elba as Roland, no matter how non-combative and/or reasonable their explanations are.
reply share
Now, now. Considering that there are most likely plenty of autistic people who can refrain from being insulting and condescending and are fairly reasonable, isn't that a bit of a slight to them? I think it likely has less to do with a developmental disorder and much more to do with him just being a bumhug.
Sugrnfool weighs in, and adds absolutely nothing. I'd say I was surpised, but you never add anything to any topic.
Oh, I've actually contributed plenty to various conversations around the board. You though? Nothing but a broken record of negativity and plain ol' bumhuggery. It would be nice to see you branch out. Maybe to, say, actual discussions about the source material, possibilities about how certain scenarios might play out in the movie(s), or - and you might want to sit down for this - something other than the casting and/or your greatest hits from your stock insults playlist. Just a suggestion.
reply share
The right actor is the one that both looks and can play the part, Elba fits neither of those criteria. It's a casting done simply to get attention when fans react against it. I can think of a dozen actors of the top of my head who would be a much better choice than Elba.
I have good instincts on when films will be terrible, an example very like this one. The Fantastic Four, it had a poor director who showed no respect for the source material and a race change done for no good reason. I called that it would flop and it did. This will suffer the same fate as that cr*pfest.
"Well his English is sh*t then because anyone who read the book wouldn't have cast Elba as Roland, it's terrible casting that ignores any written word on the character. Arcel is clearly a complete moron if he actually read the books and somewhere in his pea sized brain he saw Elba as Roland."
That would have been a smart casting and made something actually like the book it's supposed to be based on, don't be expecting anything like that in this film.
But guys... isn't McConaughey a lot prettier than Roland was supposed to be? I mean, maybe I'm crazy, but the last thing I'd ever call Matthew is tall, dark and ugly!
Well it wouldn't be ideal casting, but compared to the joke of Elba playing Roland it could only be better. Mcconaughey is the right race for Roland, very close to the right build and with a bit of makeup to look older and more haggard he would be fine. Meanwhile nothing can be done to make Elba not utterly wrong for Roland.
Spider reminds me of a poster I came across when Jurassic World came out. There was a debate in regards to whether the wild eggs in Jurassic Park that Grant found with the kids were raptor eggs or not. The evidence gathered clearly proves that they were raptor eggs. But that poster didn't want to listen. Instead, he reported every single thread with countless socks until the post was removed. And he did it every single time. And he still does. I dare you to go to those boards and try to discuss that topic. I dare you.